Commons:特色图片评选

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

跳转至评选区

此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语，如果需要中文交流区，请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区。

特色图片评选

欢迎来到特色图片评选！社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一，即特色图片，每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云：“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像，请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识，图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录，你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述，请参阅我们的年度评选。

你可以：

增加一个新提名
查阅图像评估指南
了解现在的评选
重申特色图片
查看目前的除名
阅览特色图片评选标准
参阅目录

规范

投票周期为10天，之后的投票将无效。
欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
提名者可以随时撤回提名。
每个注册用户都可以投票，匿名用户的票将不统计。
如果提名5天后没有支持票，该提名将提前结束。
通过的标准：至少5个支持票，支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
完成的投票保存在存档。
参见投票结束后操作指引。

提名

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像，并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可，那么请按照如下步骤操作：

1. 按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg）在下方的文本框输入图像名称，然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名，请按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2）展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）进行。

2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。）

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区的顶端加入新内容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作：请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作：如果您不是图像的创建者，请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括号）。

注意，你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当！

光暗度

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候，投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示，它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个（甚至四个）圈子，那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子，你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数，故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话，也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图，图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合，你则须要调校你的伽玛设置（在电脑的输出设置上，而不在于屏幕显示），直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难，然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意，在液晶显示（无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕）上观看图片，你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要，请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Featured picture candidates

File:Un pecheur rentre au port au lever du jour à kerkennah - vue large - tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 09:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info A fisherman returns to the port at daybreak in Kerkennah The photo was taken from a fishing tool used to catch octopus; created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What an innovative composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: would support if horizon is straightened; very impressive otherwise. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 27.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 07:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info Coat of arms and portrait of Cardinal Augustin Bea, ceiling painting, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 04:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caldeira Grande 2023-02-25.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Caldeira Grande, Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portale della Chiesa di San Michele.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info: portal of the Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose While I see this photo as a superior to full scale chapel (if you can't step further from the object — shoot the details), this picture is lacking wow and is blurred on the top. Maybe a QI but not a FP IMO, sorry. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info: square crop without the oculus. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbitistes constrictus BW 2023-09-11 16-20-45 FR.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 14:47:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Tettigoniidae (Katydids or Bush Crickets)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 90 % of the picture is blurred because only the head is in focus. And the animal is bad cropped. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop doesn't sit right with me. Wolverine XI 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support In macro photography Sebring12Hrs if you don't stack images with different depths of field you can't have all the animal in focus especially if it is not parallel to the lens. The photo was taken at f13, he couldn't do better--El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You don't have as big a depth of field as you do with focus-stacking though this was not taken with a macro lens. The depth of field is worse if you get in too close. Naturally, an animal in profile will have more of its body in focus than this sort of threequarter view, but Orthoptera legs and Tettigoniidae antennae are very tricky. There is seldom a reason to crop off part of an animal unless the objective is a close up. In this case a tighter crop just to show the head would make it look better, but the head isn't especially sharp so it might not be worth it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was taken with a macro lens of this kind: https://www.grainlab.com/images/product_images/original_images/pen_f_28-50_1a.jpg and is done without focus stacking because it's a living animal in nature. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The animal was cut (leg and antenna), additionally the problem of depth of field, here you can see an image of a similar subject in focus and not cut --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:004 Sunrise at Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 11:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tanzania
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good light and colors but nothing seems to be really in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message. The focus was at infinity. The house on the hill for example seems in clear focus to me. Maybe because of the huge resolution of the file it was still rendering when you zoomed in? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. The mountain and also most of the trees on the plain are in focus. I guess the impression of softness is just due to some haze which may be inevitable at these distances. – Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forester kangaroo (Macropus giganteus tasmaniensis) juvenile hopping Esk Valley.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 10:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see it hopping...Wolverine XI 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-06-01 09-15-09 FortDuLomont.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh light at right. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor technically with very bad lighting. Wolverine XI 21:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-06-01 10-07-04 FortDuLomont.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There're many lens flares on the photo. ★ 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anguila listón azul (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 60.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 20:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)
Info Ribbon eel (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domestic cat by Shagil Kannur.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 18:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In their habitats#Carnivora (Carnivores)
Info Domestic cat. All by-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Need more DoF, the other cat is important too --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wilfredor. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cute cats, but sorry, the image has a number of issues in addition to the DoF that Wilfredor pointed out. The colors are quite oversaturated and most of the greens have maximum saturation. The left cat is supposed to be in focus but is not very sharp and seems to have been aggressively sharpened in post. Domestic cats are extremely commonly photographed animals so the bar for an outstanding photo is very high in my opinion. dllu (t,c) 03:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks a little overprocessed too. ★ 15:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa).jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:34:09

Info The image quality is significantly worse than existing FP File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg. It is only a tenth of the resolution in each dimension not to mention worse dynamic range and detail. (Original nomination)
Delist -- dllu (t,c) 17:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This wouldn't be promoted now, after someone has uploaded a 600 megapixel behemoth view of the same subject, but on its own it doesn't fall short enough of FPC standards to need delisting. It's not like this is is VIC, where there can only be one image per subject. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the original nominator. ★ 21:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even though the pictures portraits the same subject almost from the same placement, light and colors are slightly different. I agree with to others to keep both as FP, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zhuhai Fisher Girl statue dllu.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:27:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pie grieche grise.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 16:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
Info created by skander zarrad - uploaded by skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This other image from Tunisia is not quite FP but I much prefer it to this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Light painting round left move.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good fow factor. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution could be better, really good composition. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:-i---i- (22414622307).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
Info created by Lunna Campos - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Symmetrical impression could be better. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course, but the arrangement of the elements doesn't appear to be symmetrical, so there's not much to do. ★ 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think a more describing file name would be appreciated --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ECB at sunrise, Frankfurt am Main (IMG 20220427 071600-RR).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 11:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very low resolution by modern standards especially for an architectural subject; and the composition could be better in my opinion. For example, the way a lamp post in the foreground is occluding one of the main pylons of the bridge. dllu (t,c) 17:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clouded yellow Colias croceus Ichkeul.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 10:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support All relevant areas are naturally in focus without artificial oversharpening. Attractive subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 10.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 08:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info Barbary macaque father and mother with baby; created by Llez| - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No focus on the eyes, and the shadows are quite annoying. Wolverine XI 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadow in the background, I'd also prefer lower point of view. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak supportThe shadows are a downside, but the baby steals the show.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:151011-010 Hopetoun Falls.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 05:31:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
Info created and uploaded by Faj2323 - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MB-one (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:F-16 Solo Display Team Radom 2009 b.JPG (delist)

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 01:41:47

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. Not very sharp. Compare to this image by the same author, which is better in every way: File:F-16_Demo_Team_2722.jpg (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (was: {{FPX}}) Sorry, but only two active nominations by the same user are allowed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Aristeas: this is not exactly a nomination. 2804:14D:5C32:4673:DA2:DE21:DDC8:DCF1 04:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We often say that images are “nominated for delisting” and AFAICR apply the “only two nominations” limit also to delist nominations. However I would be happy to learn that I am wrong.

Asking some users which were especially interested in rule discussions in the past – @A.Savin, Basile Morin, Charlesjsharp, Rhododendrites, W.carter – and everybody else with FPC experience: Would you say that the “only two active nominations by the same user” limit applies also to delist nominations (as I have assumed here) or would you say that one can nominate as many images for delisting as one wants?

I would argue that the limit should also apply to delist nominations.

Formal argument: the rules say “The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period”, so if not stated differently the two nominations limit should also apply to delist nominations.
Material argument: In past discussions the limit has often been justified by emphasizing (1) that nominations must be discussed carefully (we want quality, not quantity); and (2) that the FP maintenance resources are very limited. IMHO both points apply even a fortiori to delist nominations: (1) they certainly need an especially careful discussion (we all want to avoid arbitrary delisting) and (2) they mean even more work for us maintainers than normal nominations – delisting a FP always requires misc. manual edits.

How do you see this? Thank you very much for your statements! Best, – Aristeas (talk) 05:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I recall we've had a few discussions about how many delists should be allowed and always come back to the "Delists are the same as normal nominations". Mostly for the reasons that people have such mixed feelings about having delists at all, and that there is so much work in closing them and only a few users know how to do it properly, since it's all done manually.

But since this question pops up from time to time, perhaps we should add a word or two to the rules to clarify this. Such discussions belong on the FPC talk page, not on a nom since it requires input from the community. I suggest you copy these comments to that page and let the discussion continue there. --Cart (talk) 07:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are so right, Cart. We need a general discussion in order to amend the rules with an explicit rule for this case. Please continue the rules discussion on the FPC talk page. Thank you everybody! – Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Reading more carefully, the two-delist-rule is written in the delist rules: "There is a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.". Admittedly the sentence could be placed better (see FPC talk page), but this is a clear {{FPD}}. --Cart (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

File:Photograph of Gustave Doré by Nadar, between 1856 and 1858.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Adam. He knows what he is doing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG (delist)

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:55:40

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Grainy. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raggiana Bird-of-paradise 0A2A5379.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:02:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paradisaeidae_(Birds-of-paradise)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The right side is very blurry. ★ 20:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not one of the rarest birds, though amazing to get a photograph; but so tricky to ignore serious technical shortcomings. I much prefer several of the other images on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is insufficient even for QI. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are many things wrong with this. We got quality, the distracting stuff on the right, technical problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist)

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 16:40:29

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). There is a distressing amount of chromatic aberration in this photo. Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist : very blurry --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Indeed poor quality even for its time. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Schierbecker and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:060 Olive baboon walking at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 12:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For FP this should be identified and categorized as a juvenile Papio anubis Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the comment, caption, description, category and file name edited -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJ Giles, you've done it again! --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No words. Wolverine XI 14:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing Mud puddling position of Cethosia biblis (Drury,1773) - Red Lacewing.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 05:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible specimen. Wolverine XI 09:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Plozessor (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing contrast between the butterfly and the background. --MB-one (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per MB-one. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:African wattled lapwing (Vanellus senegallus senegallus).jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp Judging by how you replied to this nomination, I'm assuming there's something wrong with the image. Is part of the animal out of focus? I would love to know. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it looks lovely at first glance, but I am not sure it has the sharpness and feather definition for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecokathedraal, 29-04-2024 (actm.) 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty boring to say the least. Wolverine XI 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Wang Jingwei.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 21:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by 京都東 - uploaded by 京都東 - nominated by AESTIVUM -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose File size is too small and very grainy, even for an image in that year -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality and very noisy IMO. Wolverine XI 09:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary. Just a man with his sheep. Or am I missing something? Wolverine XI 10:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wolverine, also some parts (like the sheep's neck) are blurry without an apparent reason. --Plozessor (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great composition. --MB-one (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: the light is not ideal, but very expressive somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balzender-Blauer-Pfau-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu (t,c) 22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, and subject in shadow, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful peafowl but a less than stellar composition. Wolverine XI 10:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zebramanguste-Mungos-Mungo-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)
Comment Banded mongoose (mungos mungo)
Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'd prefer the background to be all black. Wolverine XI 10:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beaumont - moulin banal et tour Salamandre - 2024-05-11 - 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 15:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH₂O^(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. -- JmH₂O^(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pleasant composition with nice light but IMO not outstanding shot. Maybe a lower point of view with more road and less sky would work better. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 14:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH₂O^(talk) 14:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. --JmH₂O^(talk) 15:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral very slightly leaning out and sharpness could be better. --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice quality but the light is quite ordinary. Dark trees with the right wing in the shade makes the photo looks unbalanced - too bright on the left, too dark on the right. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bluebells in the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (42915p).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:29:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info Bluebells (Hyacinthoides non-scripta) - pretty park scene at the botanical garden. I looked up the origin of that odd "non-scripta" name. It's a mythology reference. When Hyacinthus was accidentally killed, a flower grew from his blood and Apollo's tears marked the letters AIAI on the petals. Basically this is saying "not the kind of hyacinth that has letters on it". all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 14:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment any reason to cut the road, could start from edge.--Mile (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean crop out the mulch path on the right? No, I would not want to do that. I like the composition. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover (51492).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:07:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover, spring/summer 2024. Featured in the Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". A different version of this dress got some attention when it was worn to this year's Met Gala. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Who should wear something like that?--Ermell (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No idea how and who should wear it, but it works as a beautiful, aesthetic art object. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool image. Wolverine XI 14:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corvus corax in puddle at Bonny Doon Beach.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 09:10:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info A raven, Corvus corax, standing in a puddle at Bonny Doon Beach in Davenport, California. Renominated since the previous nomination got no feedback. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry you didn't get feedback on the last one. Once in a while we'll see a photo that isn't quite up to anyone's standards for Featured Picture, but also isn't particularly bad enough to oppose. An all-black subject is very difficult to photograph, and while you've done a pretty good job here, the level of detail just isn't up to what people expect for birds at FPC. From looking at the ground, it looks like the focus might be just slightly past the bird. A smaller focus window and faster shutter might help. Some people might find the background a little off-putting, too (there's a lot of personal preference involved here). So in short I think you have a good photo that could be helpful to illustrate a common raven, but it's probably not going to work for Featured Picture. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see an outstanding photo - quality, composition, and light are all good but not FP good to me. The left tight crop makes the photo look unbalanced. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Shakespeare by John Taylor, edited.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by John Taylor / National Portrait Gallery, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Not very high resolution, but good reproduction of a famous painting. FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the quality is very low. I suggest restoring then nominating it again. Wolverine XI 19:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a historical painting, so we usually do not edit it. This one is more than 400 years old, so the cracks are a normal feature in this case. Yann (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rainbow (17659375763).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
Info Ruben Andon: Make up, Body art & hair: Barbara Rizzuti
Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Rainbow? No. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Perfectly in time for June :-). --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not a good file name per Commons guidelines. Please think of such things before you create nominations. Something like "Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup" would be better. Plus the description is inadequate, I'll fix that one for you. --Cart (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No urgency per se, but people may be more inclined to support the nom if everything is top notch for it, plus nominators tend to forget such "minor" things once they've got their star. --Cart (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This image is technically fine, but I don't like the left-leaning nature of the subject. A centered subject is preferable, and a more expressive face is desirable. Overall, not FP in my eyes. Wolverine XI 10:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review, Wolverine XI. As far as I know, this kind of image composition is often used in documentaries to create suspense and attention. The usual harmonious placement on the right would be the less conspicuous standard. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: there are a bunch of artifacts along the upper edge of the table that need to be fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True there's a weird rectangle and an unexplainable blurred orange zone close to it. I will support again once it's fixed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement done (3rd editing) (SwissTransfer link) @Jeff G., Yann, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I have removed the above mentioned artifacts and probably unnatural appearing editing marks. If you are satisfied with the improvement after checking, you are welcome to use this version for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much better thank you! There seems to still be a blurry area close to her right shoulder (so the shoulder that appears on left on the image). There is also a blurry area close to the thumb and close to the other hand. Also, I'm wondering, is it over a table that she's placing her arms or is just a soft surface? Because it is a bit strange how the sort of white table is extremely linear just bellow the body but on the left it becomes a bit wavy (so I think it's a soft surface but that there was a white rectangle applied in postproduction bellow the body) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the quick feedback, Giles. The messy spot on her right shoulder has been fixed and the link above has been updated with the 2nd edit. As for the table, I think it's either a soft blanket or a mattress that the model is resting her elbows on. The area in the middle at chest height was probably straightened afterwards by the creator. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G., Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I uploaded the version edited by Radomianin. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the update, Yann. Sorry I wasn't that fast :) Updated the link above: I removed the messy spot on the right shoulder that Giles mentioned. I'll leave it up to you if you want to do another update. If so, thanks in advance :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and very good job Radomianin! I support the third edited version with the hands blur fixed that I guess will be uploaded soon to update the actual version Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: much better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for your improvements, Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escalators at the train station in Helsinki airport.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 14:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not exceptional in any way. Wolverine XI 19:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Nice but tilted at the top. ★ 00:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The roof. ★ 14:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.

Support ★ 15:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Cart for the clarification! Yes, the ceiling is crooked, though I think that this is because the roof is crooked ;) --Plozessor (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support after clarification. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clean work on a difficult object. Thanks to Cart for the analysis :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I can see where Remedy Entertainment got inspiration for the Oldest House... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting contemporain architecture with concrete and space, and not easy to capture without any people. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Sebring12Hrs --MB-one (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the disruptive moiré on the escalators and the cut-off entrance are removed, I am also in favour.--Ermell (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandnes City Map.png

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 09:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created and uploaded by Kevinpaulscarrott - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This has got to be one of the best city directory maps created by a Commons user out there. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question There seem to be quite a few problems with the detail; naturally maps are all about accurate detail. It needs consistency of use of Norwegian/English (e.g. Gata/Gate; use of Ceramist (a person) as opposed to Ceramics/Pottery). Accommodation should be Hotel. Huset Vart seems to be a shopping centre in a converted bicycle factory, not a science factory. Do Norwegians translate Vinmonopolet as Liquor Store; the American term? I've heard them using alcohol store or using vinmonopolet when speaking English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most maps of larger areas are outdated as soon as they are published. --Cart (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Leaning keep, but a few comments/questions: 1) why not go with the svg version? 2) It looks like File:City map stavanger.svg is the user's masterwork (in its 24th edition!). 3) Since it looks like the creator regularly updates these, does promoting it to FP prevent that updating? Would it have to be a separate file? I would support a rare exception to the prohibition on changing FPs once they're promoted in a case like this, since updates are likely just going to make it more accurate (and remove mistakes/out of date locations). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kue Lapis.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 06:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
Info created and uploaded by Shitadevi - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've made an attempt at machine translation but it's up to native speakers to fix it. dllu (t,c) 22:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding. --MB-one (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MiG-29 38.JPG (delist)

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:35:18

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft It's a grainy image of the undercarriage of a fighter jet. We've all seen one before. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nominator. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: I feel this can be improved with careful post-processing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Remote view of Jintai Temple dllu.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the water appear very grainy? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can only see slight grain when pixel peeping the 100 megapixel image, which I don't find distracting at all. Are you perhaps referring to the ripples reflecting the sky? dllu (t,c) 05:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough –

Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Desertasad (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but per the header, only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Your account only has 24 edits as of 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow, that is super high resolution. Toadspike (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Resokution is great and the motif interesting, but the lighting and composition/POV are not at FP level for me. Poco a poco (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty uninteresting light and strangely washed out colours on the building. The sharpness could also be better.--Ermell (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree about the light. Regrettably, the sky was hazy. The colors are slightly washed out since it's very far away, but I've already applied aggressive dehazing compared to the original [1]. I'm surprised to see sharpness being mentioned since the sharpness seems fine to me on the 100 megapixel photo except perhaps for the extreme corners of the image. dllu (t,c) 20:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment To be fair, I was wrong about the sharpness.--Ermell (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco an Ermell. --Milseburg (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grèbe castagneux Lac de Tunis.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 19:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I think the center side of the organism is a bit out of focus. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weg auf der Ostseite des Galgenfeldsees bei Haßfurt.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 18:32:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! ★ 23:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ for the purple glare near the sun, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: Tried to fix that purple glare, please take another look. --Plozessor (talk) 04:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still something, but almost gone - Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: Updated it once more. --Plozessor (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good now El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, yes nice autumn but otherwise nothing special for me. --A.Savin 08:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Contre-jour very well handled. --MB-one (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful autumn scenery. It could be worth trying to brighten up it further – underexposing was necessary here, but is to be compensated in post-processing. Of course it’s a matter of taste how bright it should get … – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thx, I did brighten the dark parts according to my taste. Actual look depends on the monitor setup ofc ... Plozessor (talk) 08:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. As I said, a matter of taste. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cuernos del Paine in Torres del Paine National Park.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 17:39:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile
Info created by Pedro Szekely - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The cloud obscuring parts of the mountain isn't visually appealing IMO. Also, the quality of the mountains isn't worthy of a FP, especially when the resolution and size are near 20 MB -- WildMouse76 (talk) 20:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Now that I think about it, the fog isn't really a problem. I'm still disturbed by the quality of the mountains. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think that is precisely the theme, excellent cover for the book "the fog" --Wilfredor (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback! Personally, I believe the clouds add drama and enhance the scene :) JustEMV (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral a bit much noise. Otherwise FP worthy. --MB-one (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the scene. It's true that the quality of the mountains could be better, but there are many details in the foreground. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (13).jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 15:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Main subject in the shadow. And low wow factor in my view because the architecture is not incredible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support somehow --Mile (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 00:50:50
→

Info Blown-out/overexposed sky on the horizon; replacing to File:La Défense at night, 24 June 2014.jpg (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- ★ 00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wrong file? this image was promoted, the other is supposed to replace, right? At first sight, the crop at the left was better in the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the photo-processing of the latter is better. ★ 16:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. ★ 11:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Too tight crop, and the curved light rail playing with the curved façade has disappeared. Composition and rythme more interesting in the promoted version -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Basile Morin, left version with curved light strings seems better.--MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A stalemate; each image has got its advantages. Perspective, colours and atmosphere may be better in the 2014 version, but the 2012 version has a better left crop and that great curved light rail. One could want to feature both of them, but for that they are too similar. – Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oxelaëre.- Porche de l église Saint-Martin, relief de Ste Cécile.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of Ste Cécile represented with her zither, to the right of the portal of the Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre (Nord, Fr).
all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André ^(talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. ★ 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spectacled weaver (Ploceus ocularis ocularis) male feeding Mbombela.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - WildMouse76 (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but something is off here. I think it's the bird's positioning. It's not facing the camera and we can't really make out it's physique. Had the bird faced the camera in a classic stance, I'd have supported this image. The composition and crop are not a problem if you're wondering. Wolverine XI 11:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The classic stance image has FP potential, but the nominated image is more dynamic. No idea what you mean by 'not facing the camera'. Classic bird photos have the head in profile; like here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]