User talk:Krd

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning
If your question is why a specific file has been deleted or how it can be restored, please advise on initial contact that you have read COM:L and COM:VRT and why this doesn't answer your questions.

Questions from users who appear to have not read the mentioned two pages will not be answered.

 Warning
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. For the archive overview, see archive.

Karten wirklich ohne Lizenzinformation?

[edit]

Hallo, gestern wurde eine Vielzahl von Karten (größtenteils Gemarkungsgrenzen und Einzugsgebiete unterfränkischer Gemeinden) entfernt, was einen großen Informationsverlust darstellt. Als Grund angegeben ist "No license since 25 March 2024", was für mich jedoch nicht nachvollziehbar ist, da in der Google-Suche nach den Karten noch Lizenzinformationen zu finden sind. Ich könnte mir lediglich vorstellen, dass die Lizenzinformationen durch Vandalismus entfernt wurden. Ich bitte um Prüfung und ggf. Wiederherstellung.

Es handelt sich – sofern ich alle gefunden habe – um folgende Dateien (sorry für die lange Liste):

Vaionaut (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Beispiele, die ich jetzt nochmal geprüft habe, sollen alle "Eigenes Werk" und "CC-by-sa-4.0" sein. Das trifft sicher nicht zu. Krd 16:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Danke Krd, verzeih bitte dennoch die Nachfrage: Laut Google-Suche waren Hinweise auf die Openstreetmap hinterlegt ("This map of Fellen was created from OpenStreetMap project data, collected by the community. This map may be incomplete, and may contain errors. [...]"), z.B. bei File:Fellen 500.png oder File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png. Wo ist der Unterschied z.B. zu File:Lammersdorf Openstreetmap 110209.png? Kann die Lizenzinformation nicht korrigiert werden, wenn sie nachvollziehbar ist? Vaionaut (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Es gibt zahlreiche Beispiele, in denen nichts von OSM steht. Hast Du eine Liste der Dateien, die von OSM stammen? --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: You tagged these as dw_no_source but some appear to be valid OpenSteetMap files. Please advise. --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For example, license tag on File:Esselbach 500.png was {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} what is obviously wrong: work of other people was used, so {{Self}} claim is invalid, as well as OpenStreetMap license is different ({{CC-BY-SA 2.0}}). Sure, files could be restored, but somebody should fix licenses there. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea who could sort all this out. Krd 04:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaionaut: Here is one example I checked: File:Aalbachtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg is derived from opentopomap.org. The file description claimed this to be the own work by the uploader (by using {{Self}}) and granted a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} which doesn't match {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} used by OpenTopoMap. Neither OpenTopoMap (for the map style) nor OpenStreetMap were credited. Mass-uploading such maps without proper credit and licenses is a disaster waiting to happen. How to fix this? We could temporarily restore the whole lot but then we need a volunteer who goes through all these files within a reasonable time frame, fixes the credits and adds links to the original maps. Is anyone willing to do this? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grób Szachna-Benisza Fiszmana.jpg

[edit]

Я прочитал COM:L и COM:VRT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levikoan (talk • contribs) 08:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый вечер. Вы удалили фото с памятника гроба, котоый был поставлен на еврейском кладбище Варшавы в 1936 году, почти 90 лет назад и в настоящее время разрушен. https://cemetery.jewish.org.pl/id_118667/info/back_1:0/__Fischman.html Гроб был стандартным и такие памятники тогда ставили. Фото памятника сделано мальчиком ARAК, когда ему было 12 лет. Его согласие на использовании фотографии было представлено. Просьба востановитьь фото. С уважением Levikoan

I've read COM:L and COM:VRT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levikoan (talk • contribs) 08:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening. You have removed the photo from the coffin monument, which was placed in the Jewish cemetery in Warsaw in 1936, almost 90 years ago and is now destroyed. https://cemetery.jewish.org.pl/id_118667/info/back_1:0/__Fischman.html The coffin was standard and such monuments were erected then. The photo of the monument was taken by the boy ARAK when he was 12 years old. His consent to the use of the photograph was provided. Please restore the photo. Sincerely Levikoan (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide permission per COM:VRT. --Krd 22:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 22:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

File:DKZ-JeonMinGyu.jpg

[edit]

Pictures are YouTube video screenshots, belong to free content, please restore this delete. Dkzjmg (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this free content? --Krd 08:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, it's free to use, and it's also marked with the source and copyright, what's the main reason for the deletion? Dkzjmg (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly do you conclude from that it is free to use? Krd 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your processing, I re-query the relevant specifications, the original uploaded pictures do not conform to the rules, I will come back again. Retired (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 22:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Dr-Toth-Tibor-NSZI-foigazgato-PPKE-2024.jpg

[edit]

The file was deleted, because the author (Hajdu, Kitti) did not sent her permission since 3 May. I think that the re-uploaded file by @Idihnab2024: has the same issue, so it would be necessary to discuss the problem whether the permission was not sent, or sent just not attached to the file. (https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vita:T%C3%B3th_Tibor_(szoci%C3%A1lpolitikus)&diff=prev&oldid=27101802). JSoos (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The permission ticket is still waiting to be processed. Krd 10:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The e-mail was sent from hajdu.kitti@nszi.gov.hu to permissions-hu@wikimedia.org for file: (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dr-Toth-Tibor-NSZI-foigazgato-PPKE-2024.jpg). I hope, this is sufficient to be accepted. Idihnab2024 (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 22:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Ma pona pi toki pona - icon (2023).png

[edit]

this file was deleted even though the author contacted VRT on my behalf (original uploader). on the deletion log is says that there was no ticket permission despite the creator have done that. Juwan (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the ticket number the permission sender got. Krd 04:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimash's Stranger concert in Almaty 2022.jpg

[edit]

Dear @Krd! On 30 May You putted a template to this photo. I don't understand why, because there was written "A feltöltő saját munkája" (in English: The uploader's own work). On same day I supplemented the Source line with "Own work", and I asked You at my account. It seems You didn't read it, that's why I repeat here my question:

"Dear @Krd! This photo made I myself at the concert in Almaty. There is written: "A feltöltő saját munkája" (in English: The uploader's own work). What's the problem with it? Whose and what consent should I get? What kind of website should I link to? Thank You,"

And may I ask, how long will it take to process of permisson of István Lajkó's photo - over 30 days?

I wait your answers. Thank You

Tösö8 (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the photo depicts the stage scene and requires permission from the copyright holder of that. Krd 18:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You say it not seriously, are you? Tösö8 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're only 3 led-walls and a snapshot from the concert. Tösö8 (talk) 20:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhumbol coronation 2.jpg, again

[edit]

Last year, the file was deleted after someone removed the licensing templates from the file description; you restored it after I raised the issue. This seems to have happened again. Now, the image probably has to be considered URAA restored, so I'm not going to ask that it be restored, but could you check to see if the licence tags were removed in bad faith, and if so, whether the remover also committed such vandalism to other file pages which may have also been deleted as a result? --Paul_012 (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS Could you also check the contributions of the person who removed the tags the first time, as I remember that it also led to several other files being deleted out of process. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image is now restored again. I agree that the taggings of this user are controversial, but it appears to be impossible to check all of them. In any case more care has to be taken with deletion of files tagged by them. Krd 22:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krd&oldid=881835815"