Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 26 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Rectory_in_Bendern_(3).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rectory in Bendern, Unterland, Liechtenstein. --Tournasol7 05:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Appears underexposed. --Smial 12:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark, could be easily fixed though. --Plozessor 07:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

File:D-6-74-164-84_Schützentor_in_Königsberg_in_Bayern,_Inschrift_an_der_Ostseite.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination East-side inscription on "Shooter's Gate" in Königsberg in Bayern --Plozessor 04:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • The photo is not symmetrical. You probably stood too much to the left.--Famberhorst 17:48, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
  • And symmetry is a requirement for QI? Nothing at these medieaval houses is symmetrical. The inscription is not in the middle of the gate. Like with the other picture, if you don't accept it, please decline it so that I can move it to discussion. I'm not allowed to move it to discussion if you just comment but don't decline. --Plozessor 06:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your answer. If it's just the text, the text could have been centered. Now the bottom part of the photo looks a bit random. I will leave the further assessment to someone else for the first few days. Then I can still decide.--Famberhorst 07:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Usually, nobody decides on photos that already have comments. But I can't move it to discussion unless you decline in. --Plozessor 19:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose To me this is an unbalanced photo. Especially the bottom half.--Famberhorst 07:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
  • I would like to hear other opinions. --Plozessor 07:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough for QI. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment. Are the beams actually curved as they appear in the photo? Or is it because of the short focal length? -- Spurzem 22:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 Support QI for me. --C messier 21:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

File:D-4-71-207-18_Pfarrkirche_St_Petrus_und_Marzellinus_in_Trunstadt_(innen,_Panorama).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Church in Trunstadt (panorama) --Plozessor 05:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Nice photo, but prominent window is burned. Even the window frames are affected. Probably not repairable.--Famberhorst 18:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
  • There's no reserve in the highlights anymore. Taking a picture of a dark church where the sun shines brightly through a window without that window burning out is practically impossible with a single shot. --Plozessor 19:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Shame about the photo. Maybe next time take 3 or 5 photos and edit them in HDR.--Famberhorst 16:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
  • @Famberhorst Can you decline it so that I can have it discussed? --Plozessor 09:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The window is not an issue. Sharp enough IMO. Yann 14:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have no problems with the overexposed window because it doesn't look unnatural. The distortions caused by the cylindrical projection are also acceptable. But why are all the objects at the top cut off? --Smial 15:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Famberhorst, @Smial, uploaded a new version with slightly different projection and crop, please have a look. --Plozessor 07:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Info I would suggest to make a pan from the center aisle of the church with maybe between 120 and 180 degrees, where the main altar is centered. This should be combined with HDR brackets (Belichtungsreihen). If someone wishes, they can crop the image to the desired motif(s). For conducting, a panoramic is necessary --PantheraLeo1359531 18:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:38, 25 December 2023 (UTC)