Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2019 at 09:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dead tree in Black Range, New Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2019 at 17:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Varanidae (Monitor Lizards)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 07:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galpagos Islands (Ecuador)

@Poco a poco: Thanks for correction but it is a part of Galapagos Island.--√Tæ√ 08:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination--√Tæ√ 12:15, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 09:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kerawang Gayo
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Lovely pattern, but at only 1 megapixel it doesn't meet size standards Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2019 at 21:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 03:45:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A teenage mahout.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 03:27:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 18:34:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2019 at 16:08:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2019 at 17:17:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La Juive
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 18:58:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mannesmann building in Düsseldorf, illuminated
  • Please point out where the perspective needs to be corrected. The verticals are exactly vertical, however the picture was taken standing on a bridge, therefore not perpendicularly in front of the building. So the river "retreats" to the left. --Till (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 13:31:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bas-relief representing the episcopate of Monseigneur de Laval.
That is pretty much the size of the original picture (considering it needed an tilt correction). --Cephas (talk) 00:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2019 at 16:37:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White Stork, departure
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 22:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mist (visible atmospheric water) shortly before sunrise
I like this one much more (mist and more visible content)-- Basile Morin (talk) 02:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 09:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Fog

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 18:32:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

201 Dome Mosque in Bangladesh
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bangladesh

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 16:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:23, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 21:56:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Rektoratskirche St. Karl Borromäus, Vienna, Austria.
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 22:45:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Watson River Upper Canyon
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 19:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2019 at 15:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oriental whipsnake
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2019 at 13:47:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ekaterinburg Opera and Ballet House
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2019 at 19:15:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Benh, please avoid responding to criticism by in turn being critical of the reviewer's own work/nominations. And anyway, the merits/qualities of the two images are quite different and not directly comparable. -- Colin (talk) 17:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Colin: you are totally right. I just wanted to point out, probably not in the most elegant way, that the review is a bit unfair, and that Alexander's review could totally be transposed to his nom. - Benh (talk) 20:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks to A.Savin and Cart for the different fixes. - Benh (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Commons is more than just a repository of identity-photos of buildings and people for Wikipedia. The leg rowing on Inle Lake appears to be an "iconic" thing, so lets have a photographic/artistic excellent picture of it. I could very much see this on the cover of a tour/guide-book for the region, which certainly fits within Commons scope. -- Colin (talk) 17:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support +1. People here (myself not excluded) sometimes seem to forget that there are projects other than Wikipedia, and that these projects may have different needs regarding media files. This one's perfect for Wikivoyage, for example: Inle lake. --El Grafo (talk) 08:11, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's even worst than what you might think. There are heaps of these fishermen awaiting to pose for tourists (and expecting tips in return, obviously). That pose, we got after a tip. Everything was staged (in case that wasn't obvious) and even the direction of the boat, the timing... have a walk on the lake shore, you should very quicky get dozens of propositions for a "sunset boat trip" :) I wonder if these fishermen still do some actual fishing for a living. - Benh (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2019 at 18:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pavillon Alexandre-Vachon, Université Laval
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2019 at 14:01:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waihi Beach
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand#Taranaki

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2019 at 16:36:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vitis vinifera
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2019 at 23:40:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dean Emma Gillett
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2019 at 10:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Owl moth (Automeris belti belti)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Saturniidae_(Saturniids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2019 at 02:29:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blooming New England aster
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 02:55:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Casemate from the Civil War Era at Fort Point National Historic Site, Presidio of San Francisco
Yes, I took this image as part of Wiki Loves Monuments. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#United States
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 02:28:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Charles When I arrived, there was a mobile popcorn shop that I didn't expect to be there --Wilfredor (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you are right, this is a long exposure, hopefully, that moving parts look blurry. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose for the daytime shot, support for the nighttime shot, if such a thing is possible. Both are good quality, and although not quite from the same place, it's near enough so that it's broadly OK for me. However, they both seem slightly lacking in sharpness at full size, although when downsized to 3000px across they're OK; if anything, I disagree a bit with Benh, as the night-time one actually looks sharper than the day-time one when downsized. Coupled with the slightly grey-ish and flat light on the day-time shot, I don't think there's enough to feature that one for me, although it's definitely QI. But the wow of the light and the reflections in the night shot means that one works better for FP IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 19:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose per Cmao on the daytime shot, and for the weird posterization/visible brushstrokes on the sky in the nighttime shot. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2019 at 15:09:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Criccieth castle at sunset

 I withdraw my nomination OK, fair enough. The castle was not intended to be the only subject, instead I intended to capture the image so that the couple in the foreground would add visual interest rather than it just being a boring picture of a castle. It looks like people are not as impressed as I had hoped. Thanks for all reviews. Cmao20 (talk) 19:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2019 at 00:06:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Château d'Yvoire seen from Lake Leman
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: general image quality / lack of detail --Kreuzschnabel 18:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 19:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 20:07:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jupiter, perijove 22 Io shadow composite
  • Ok I took the time to read. It's a composite of several fisheye views, which explains the weird patterns. And the big relative size of the shadow. I think this should be clearly captioned. - Benh (talk) 21:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Alright I did even more digging and there are some doubts if it's not too distorted. As I can't judged it myself, I'll rather withdraw. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 19:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2019 at 17:58:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christian wedding in Russia
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 21:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common kingfisher female
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2019 at 01:30:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interiors of the Magen David Synagogue of Kolkata, India
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings #India

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 23:20:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monarch butterfly on woolly ironweed
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 10:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

3D model of placoderm Coccosteus cuspidatus, that lived in Devonian period
 Question Sharpness is fixed at the creatures eye. Where specifically is the problem? Kruusamägi (talk) 13:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • If I understand correctly, this is not a photo of a physical model, so I don't think FoP would apply. The question to me seems like whether or not the uploader is the copyright owner and/or where specifically the license is documented, as there is no direct link provided on the file page. We have a category of similar images which likewise should probably have better documentation. — Rhododendrites talk00:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This a computer-generated reconstruction of a fish that lived ca 400 million years ago. So there is no way FoP could apply.
Only that museum has those files and they were made for an exhibition (that looked like this) and we are now trying to also set that up also to wikisource. After the last files have been uploaded we'll also deal with OTRS (but it should still be obvious, that those files are from the museum collection and the only reason they are now in Commons is that the museum has allowed them to get here).
Considering that we virtually have nothing similar to that in Commons and that this is pretty high-quality stuff, it would also make sense to get something featured from that selection to encourage the museum to upload similar stuff in the future.  Kruusamägi (talk) 10:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We don't feature photos as an inducement, only because they merit featuring. Anything else has at least a vague whiff of corruption to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 06:02:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shell of an Arthritic Spider Conch, Harpago arthriticus
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 02:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama 360 of Basilique Saint-Patrick, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Cmao20 Thank you, it is also a pleasure to read you, you and the guys are like a kind of platonic family. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Spurzem: Dear Lothar Spurzem, It is a church but the flat distortion of a 360 view makes the structure look like a very elaborate circus carousel. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I thought so. But I do not like these unnatural images, though they are very artfully and with much work designed. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Spurzem: If you haven't done it before, please click here to view correctly the image. This type of image could be difficult to evaluate, especially in WLM, some jurors may not know this. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Poc Thanks for add the note. I think that the version uploaded was not my last version. Can I upload the fixed version if the WLM date has passed? (This is an image that was uploaded during the contest month and the image is participating) --Wilfredor (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wilfredor, IIRC this has been asked before and I think it is ok. I think anything that would satisfy COM:OVERWRITE is fine (fixing dust spots, stitching issues, tilt) but major changes (significant exposure change, different projection, major crop) could be a problem. In this case, I suspect the jurors would not see the flaw nor notice the change. -- Colin (talk) 14:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Colin, Recently I had a conversation on IRC with others WLM participating users and commons users about the images in 360 degrees. Juries use the Montage tool and the photo is not displayed 360° and It's important that the WLM jury can access to the image description (page in commons) where the link to display it correctly in 360 degrees is located. I have created a task in Montage project github to add this feature to Montage and I would like you to follow it (by clicking on the follow button of the task), that way, someone could attend it, however, I don't think that this improvement is ready for the current WLM event, so it would be a good idea maybe to communicate this to the jury. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 15:38:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caricature card issued in Trier, Germany (1905) Der Kleine Rat"" (The Small Council), the council members are depicted as bottles.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 15:11:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 19:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 22:39:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of the Milky Way galactic plane stretching over Bontecou Lake in Dutchess County, New York.
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Astronomy#Sky
  •  Info created by Juliancolton - uploaded by Juliancolton - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Caught sight of this on the QI page and it's the kind of image that, for me at least, makes you stop scrolling and go 'wow.' I particularly like it because it seems more carefully composed than a lot of these Milky-Way panoramas you see (IMO better than the ones that are already FP). It's a bit noisy, as one would surely expect for ISO 6400, but I think it's worth a feature, especially seeing it's by a Commons user. See what you think.  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you Cmao20 for the nomination. There are some technical flaws here—noisy shadows, trailing stars, distorted stitching in some areas. The first two may be mitigated somewhat by the relatively high resolution and lack of critical information in the bottom third of the frame; there's nothing to be gained by zooming in at 100% to study a generic pond in the dark. I do believe this has significant merit as an illustration of Milky Way visibility in suburban areas. This was photographed merely 90 miles from one of the largest and brightest cities in the Western Hemisphere, so it's nice to show that deep-sky observing is often much closer to major population centers than many individuals believe possible. If there is enough interest, I could take a stab at re-processing this with an eye for FP standards, ensuring a more level horizon, and taking care of hot pixels (mind, some of the yellow-green "hot pixels" are actually fireflies!). Not sure there's much more to be done about the high-ISO noise... even after pushing the exposure another couple stops in LR and further locally brightening the shadows, I'm relatively happy with the retained detail and acceptable quality of grain. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Make any improvements you like, but it's already an FP to me, because I find it excellent at 300% of my 13-inch laptop screen. I also really like how the curve of the Milky Way is echoed by the curve of the near shore of the lake, among many other nice things. And I've also done some observation of the night sky in Dutchess County, as my girlfriend has sung in the chorus at the Bard Summerscape. There is a little light pollution from Newburgh and Beacon, but most of the sky is quite clear in good weather. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ikan Kekek: Thank you, and you've got it exactly right. Although dark sites in the mid-Hudson Valley get a little harder to find each year, they still exist, and one can catch some beautiful views of the night sky. I'm glad you've had such an opportunity. It also helps to plan out times when the galactic core is in a relatively dark "direction" from desired observing spots. Like you say, light pollution is particularly problematic in the POU-SWF-MGJ corridor, so early summer is often best for Dutchess County, before the MW migrates too far southwest. Feel free to look me up the next time you're in town! –Juliancolton | Talk 15:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charles, as already discussed on a previous nom of mine, we basically have 30 sec to shoot a picture with a wide angle lens (as it is the case here as well), and very little light. Expose longer than that, and the stars have moved too much and render as very noticeable trails. So that means highest acceptable ISO, and biggest aperture. Both are not quality friendly, but it's better to get a bad quality picture than a good quality nothing. And it's not so bad here. The noise is very well controled on the sky. The ground is grainy but acceptable I think. As mentionned, Some people shoot the foreground with lower iso and then composite the whole thing. - Benh (talk) 11:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your interesting explanation Benh. This is indeed why I nominated the image; the noise in the sky is really quite minimal, and although the ground is noisy, it's really not that bad considering the technical issues. The composition and the beauty of the motif make up for unavoidable technical failings to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, it would have not been possible to shoot this at a lower ISO unless I wanted to get into aggressive compositing, which in my opinion always leads to unnatural-looking results, even when done skillfully. My noise-mitigation technique relies mainly on using one of the best low-light cameras available. I'm sure one day, with ever-improving tech, we will be able to look back in disbelief at what was considered "acceptable" noise, but for now this is probably approaching the upper bounds of noise management at ISO 6400 (and then some). And while I could have earned another 1.3(?) stops of light by using an f/1.8 lens instead of f/2.8... have ya ever seen the way stars look at f/1.8? Yuck. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I could have earned another 1.3(?) stops > it's (2.8 / 1.8)^2 = 2.4 more light :) (square because we talk about area), so it's still a tricky question in my opinion :) - Benh (talk)
  • OK for those wondering: 1 stop = 2 times more light = (f number / squareroot(2)). So going from f/4 to f/2.8 = roughly squareroot(2) = two times more light = 1 stop. So going from 2.8 to 1.8 = 2.4 more light = 1.2 stops. Hope I did get it right. - Benh (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 23:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Abbaye de la Cambre, Ixelles, Belgium
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2019 at 04:03:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 22:11:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Statue of Sylvester II in Aurillac, Cantal, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 18:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 22:06:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place Nationale in Montauban, Tarn-et-Garonne, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 18:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 15:06:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
It's still very visible. Instead of cloning, healing brush should be used. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:44, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants #Family : Balsaminaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 19:23:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

3D model of trilobite
3D model it is. Probably they considered that kind of lightning more suitable for bringing out details or something. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Thanks, weird decision. Charles (talk) 09:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 17:19:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galapagos land iguana (Conolophus subcristatus), Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2019 at 17:26:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orange Roman Theater 2008
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2019 at 10:32:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rose hips on a Rosa rugosa Hansa
  • I don't agree with the idea of toning down anything white in a photo to a dull gray > Thank you! You are officially my hero Cart (but I can agree the light is a tad harsh, which is probably what Cosmonaut means. Wouldn't have hurt to use a reflector or wait for overcast weather) - Benh (talk) 14:47, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks Benh (that would be heroine). ;) Me and Cosmonaut (formerly know as CCCP) have had these conversation about highlights before. Living in a dark part of the world I simply like bright parts in a photo if they occur naturally and can interact well with the rest of the photo for some reason. Btw, I forgot since you withdrew your bamboo photo. If you do a bit of color correction on the leaves to get the more natural colors, the white light doesn't appears so bright and "blown". I did a quick and dirty fix to check this: here. It does however change the whole color scheme in the photo and the Flickr/Instagram wow effect gets lost but it's more along the line of a FPC photo. I too like to keep cool light set by nature or play around with colors and things you can do in Photoshop, but FPC is very seldom the right venue for such experiments. (tried it, got burned) That's for sites more interested in artistry and further development of photography. --Cart (talk) 16:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes I remember I was a bit frustrated by how conservative FPC is. I can tell you after a long break that I feel a difference (and it's good). I was also working on a fix to my bamboo photo (this is work in progress). I don't really get feedbacks on Flickr, so hard to know when you go overboard. Here I learnt a few mistakes I did. Thank you for the comment and the picture heroine :) - Benh (talk) 20:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • First of all, once you highlights are truly blown, there isn't much you can do; toning them down to dull grey is certainly not a remedy. Regardless, there shouldn't be much white to begin with on low albedo objects like vegetation, it's not polished metal after all. For stationary objects that are easily accessible, we ought to expect technical aspects to be handled more diligently. In this case, it's simply a matter of too much light allowed to enter the camera. Choosing a higher f-number would likely have solved that, while also improving the depth of field. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:01, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2019 at 18:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower Bridge from the Shard London Bridge
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2019 at 02:53:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skylight in the abandoned City Hall subway station (closed since 1943) in New York City
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 18:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2019 at 23:49:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 05:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 02:27:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake Clearwater, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • @Ikan Kekek Good to see you back here. No I don't, I've uploaded all usable material. Here is one more shot from that location. It was pretty cold that morning. As I didn't have gloves (the forecasting said 18 degrees during the day so I got excited so much that I forgot to check the night temperatures which were below freezing), each touch of my steel tripod was a pain so after a few shots I just went back to my sleeping bag to wait for the sun :) --Podzemnik (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case Slowly though, my tent still gets icy from inside. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 05:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New_Zealand#Canterbury_(Waitaha)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 10:32:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alikianos bridge after its collapse
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 16:55:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 18:59:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Post box in Bangladesh
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 20:00:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2019 at 09:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of Le Havre, France
  • Well, the EF 24-105L isn’t the best Canon has to offer, true. It’s still decent imo. As for the light, I really disagree. You can’t beat a late afternoon sun. A little later and the shadows would become overwhelming, a little earlier and the light would be too flat. –Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Apart from the crop, the new version is hardly better than the old one. The sky is washed-out. Many of the buildings are overexposed. Do you sincerely think that if you shot a picture in poor light, you still can "synthesize" good light in Photoshop afterwards?
    And there is another question. Is the sculpture made of containers maybe too prominent in the picture? No FoP in France, you remember? --A.Savin 14:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • No it's not. Not even 10% (probably closer to 5%) and the topic is clearly Le Havre's UNESCO world heritage downtown, so we can consider the "art" thing stands in the way. - Benh (talk) 16:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 18:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2019 at 14:11:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

orchid world
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 19:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 19:39:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 23:40:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rescued eastern screech owl with eye injury
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Boothsift 00:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order_:_Strigiformes_(Owls)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 17:13:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

passiflora
  • Well done, Colin, I was wondering why the category didn't link to any existing FPs of the flower, especially as Franz van Duns' FP was quite recent and I remembered voting for it. Nevertheless this continues to be FP level for me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Passifloraceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 00:08:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Altolamprologus compressiceps (Compressed cichlid
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 21:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Douaumont national cemetery, near Verdun.
  • More close to the first. The crosses are only incidental on the second. And I didn't say we don't have any ;) (please don't dig to get the pics to prove me wrong!) - Benh (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't take it the wrong way, You did ask. ;) People like to be able to compare with existing FPs, and in this case it actually shows the uniqueness of your nom. --Cart (talk) 22:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 01:46:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Oppose I think the image quality is actually quite good, on the whole, but I agree with KennyOMG about the framing. I get that the idea is to show this beautiful building in its context, but it means that a large proportion of the frame is featureless darkness. Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  weak support My first thinking was that I'd have preferred this is taken at dusk, but I wonder then if the pond wouldn't have ruin the composition. But yes, it's really really dark. - Benh (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose Perhaps it would work with a crop but for now the most interesting seems lost in the darkness. Boring night is occupying too much place -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose per Basile (I must confess I am also amused by the filename: "... Illuminated at Night". As opposed to "Illuminated in the Daytime"?) Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:59, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 07:45:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of a clematis flower. Stack from 55 frames with Helicon Focus
Confirmed results:
Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Ranunculaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2019 at 23:11:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lakhta Center in St. Petersburg


Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Obviously not FP. --A.Savin 13:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 15:30:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Danube mermaid fountain, Palais Ferstel, Vienna, Austria.
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:11, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 18:15:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dactylorhiza incarnata infructescence
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 05:48:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Baar from the northern slope of the Fürstenberg, Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2019 at 11:45:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Main axis Memorial Treptower Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2019 at 17:22:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Jewish cemetery of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2019 at 18:53:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Organ, Church of St Peter and St Paul, East Harling
  • Basile Morin, I can see why you might think that, but it is just the shape of the pipe. See this frame. You said "stitching errors" -- are there any more areas you suspect? Basile, I know you are still relatively new here, but most reviewers do not oppose for trivial defects (a few pixels in a 100-million pixel image) or for easily fixable defects. -- Colin (talk) 07:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Musical instruments

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2019 at 16:01:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 10:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 20:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2019 at 16:53:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Small-flowered mullein

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 16:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orchis militaris
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 08:55:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Church of St. Francis and St. Bernard in Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • @A.Savin: No it is not one of the best Diliff's interiors because all of them are already FPs. But his images quality is so high that even his mediocre pictures can easily compete with other authors pictures, therefore I think it is unfair to compare it with the Diliff's works only. This church windows are mostly transparent and are not fully covered with the stained glasses (good illustration of that even if these are not the same windows as seen in this interior photo), the day was obviously very sunny and so the light shines into the interior, however all the windows constructions are fully visible and are not blown out, so I think it is balanced. Other Diliff's interiors also includes light rays. Donations box is not a trash bin, so it does not disturb me - donations boxes are an integral part of the churches. -- Pofka (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support Not IMO one of Diliff's stronger church interiors. I don't have it on my list of Diliff images to eventually get round to nominating, owing in large part to A. Savin's first criticism about the donation box, but also because of the distortion of the top lamp. The blown windows don't bother me especially as I usually prefer that bright white highlights are left that way instead of being artificially pulled back so they look grey-ish. So overall Diliff has done much stronger images; but ultimately, we are judging this based on whether it's amongst the best church interiors on Commons, not the best church interiors in Diliff's output. This image is not perfect, but it's very sharp as typical for Diliff's work, and depicts an important exemplar of Lithuanian Gothic architecture. Compared to this, a church interior which passed FP only last year, the image quality and sharpness are clearly superior. Based on those standards, I still do think this counts as one of the best images on Commons, so it should be FP for me; but it's not as clear-cut as most Diliff church interiors. Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cmao20: Indeed. We must compare it with all the Commons pictures and not only with the Diliff's pictures. This church is one of the primary Gothic landmarks of Lithuania, so it is a very prominent object and this interior picture of it is easily the best one available in the Commons. Even in your provided Dillif's picture blue windows have that whitish effect and this Lithuanian one has a completely transparent glass windows, so the effect is slightly stronger, but is balanced and not blown out. -- Pofka (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 19:12:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Our Lady of the Rocks, Perast, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2019 at 20:08:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

One of the "Śnieżne Stawki" ponds in the Giant Mountains, at an elevation of about 1240 m (4070 ft) below the northern cliffs of the top ridge. They’re fed by melted snow from the ridge with crystal clear water and usually fall dry during summer because they’re nowhere deeper than 1.5 m (5 ft).
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2019 at 14:18:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The chalk cliffs and coastline in the Jasmund national park.
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2019 at 14:51:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Shah Abbas I receives the Uzbek ruler Vali Muhammad Khan" painting on the east wall of the north bay of central audience hall of Chehel Sotoun Palace
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2019 at 13:03:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coronation of the Virgin XV century fresco on the Pala dei Disciplini retable in the Santa Maria del Carmine church in Brescia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2019 at 19:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

the ceiling of the audience hall of Ālī Qāpū Palace
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2019 at 00:53:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden apple snail eggs
Confirmed results:
Result: 30 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 06:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2019 at 00:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Observation deck at Kyoto Tower in Japan
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 06:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Japan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 19:26:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama view of Salinas and Aguada Blanca National Reserve, Arequipa, Peru.
  • No it's not mine to remove the QI thing. And no I'll comment as I feel as long as my comment is factual. If you don't like correct comments, don't post your pictures here. Again what is disrespectful is posting a picture here with such glaring error, let alone uploading it to Commons. - Benh (talk) 19:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's like talking to a wall. Is not about the content but the package. You talk like only solid FPs should be allowed to upload on Commons. You'd have a lot of fun reviewing recent unploads. Poco2 07:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have much more fun when a nom is carefully thought about before crashing here. Not necessarily because it's going to pass. But this I've told you a zillion times and... it's like talking to a wall. - Benh (talk) 19:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2019 at 05:44:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A windmill from Nedoboivtsi (Khotyn Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast). Currently in Museum of Folk Architecture and Life in the Middle Dnieper Ukraine, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine

 I withdraw my nomination For right now, I'll try to get Alexander to correct the CA. --Boothsift 04:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2019 at 12:08:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alcove wayside shrine “Jagakreuz”, set up in 1518, in Untergreutschach, municipality Griffen, district Völkermarkt, Carinthia, Austria, EU
To specify: the shadows seem orientated towards us, which means the sun is more in front than behind. Shooting against the light, that's probably why the colors look a bit washed out. Perhaps the best composition from that point, unfortunately the orientation of the sun is not very cooperative -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 16:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2019 at 05:35:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Federal Palace of Switzerland with full flags due to Indian President's state visit.

* regretful oppose crisp and beautiful with an amazing sky! It's just that the image definitely needs perspective correction --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Question @Benh: Is there a non-obtrusive way to do so? --Axel (talk) 20:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support--Moahim (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't notice that the voting period is over. Agree with Benh. --Moahim (talk) 06:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry, I did not get the ping in time. I would have change my vote to support, but now the voting period is over. Nevertheless, thank you for the additional effort with perspective correction, now the image is even greater. I am glad that it is featured! --Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2019 at 15:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jasper cat snake
I thinks that they works(ed) for the "parks"; or that they got the permission to take photos in those protected restricted areas at the condition that they gives credits to the "parks". I don't know. But I have no doubts that Rushenb is the photographer and that the photos are "own works", the photo is also published at here and in full resolution in the flickr account of the uploader there. Note that the other uploads of that users (are all as good!) seems to have the same kind of text in the description. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am (Rushen Bilgin) the owner of Thai National Parks website. I publish my photos with Thai National Parks as the owner. The website is not an official website.Rushen (talk) 11:11, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2019 at 16:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shattered glass light fixture on a bamboo floor mat
@W.carter: Actually, that was the sort of thing I was thinking about but I thought it would have been too much of a cliché.

I've yet to have one of my images used on a book cover; magazines, though, are a different story. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Lamps

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2019 at 22:11:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

w:Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 05:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 11:18:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horloge mural
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: lack of image quality and subject not special enough Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

--Uoaei1 (talk) 11:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2019 at 14:59:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2019 at 18:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monte Cristallo seen from Faloria, Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy.
Eliminating the blotches and striations, in favor of hue/shade shifts without lines in between the hues/shades. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose This is a pretty good picture, but the Moroder pics of this region have set a bar as high as Diliff's church interiors, and it doesn't get over that bar. It just seems too ordinary, and harshly lit. Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose sorry Kallerna but I'm inclined to agree with the above. Moroder's images are better when we're looking at alpine shots on Commons. This one is QI definitely, but I don't think the composition is that great. It's nice, but no more, considering the strong material available on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 23:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Moroders pictures? Is there a summertime picture of Cristallo mountain by Moroder? I really don't get your point. Featured by Moroder, has a midday sun, and the quality is also mediocre. Not saying it was not a good shot, I just mean that not every fp should be taken during sunset nor by specific individual. —kallerna (talk) 04:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Honestly, I don't think that picture is anything like as good as Moroder's current work. I would probably give it a 'weak support' today, because I like the composition but the light is fairly weak and the quality isn't perfect (note that it was promoted in 2014). He has better pictures in this genre, such as this or this. Ultimately my issue with your image is composition, not quality. The image quality is pretty great, however the composition just doesn't appeal to me; I feel like I'd prefer to see a wider panorama. I think it's your misfortune that you're competing in a genre where there's lots of existing very strong work. But of course not every FP should be taken by a specific individual, I have regularly supported your work before (e.g. this). Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still, it's another place in another season. I get your point with wider panorama, thou IMO panoramas are never as good as individual frames. This one features wider point of view from the same mountain, and this is a real panorama from the same set. Anyways, thanks for the explanation. —kallerna (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2019 at 15:27:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vanessa cardui on Lavandula angustifolia
Confirmed results:
Result: 32 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 07:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Pyrénées National Park, view on the Gavarnie valley, Hautes-Pyrénées, France.
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 09:59:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United_Kingdom#Scotland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 10:48:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 09:41:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Entrée ancienne église
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 11:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Little Venice in Colmar, Haut-Rhin, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 12:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Geographic map of the state of New York
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps
  •  Info created by ikonact - uploaded by ikonact - nominated by Ikonact -- Ikonact (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Ikonact (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Great map, very close to excellent. Data sources are listed and finally somebody remembered to specify CRS/projection information! I have some minor points, though, regarding the labeling: 1) "CANADA" has the same font specifications as "Vermont", making it look like just another US state until you realize it's all caps. Maybe make it a bit larger? 2) Automatic label placement rarely leads to satisfying solutions. Especially the labels for "Long Island Sound", "Fishers Island", "Long Island" and "Staten Island" intersect with the state border in an ugly manner. "Oneida Lake" would look much better if it was rotated by a few degrees clock-wise. Most of the smaller city names are difficult to read, as they intersect with roads and other line features. Manual placement of the labels could help in many cases (alternatively, maybe consider using label halos). 3) General layout: The placement of the zoomed-out map between the two legends is a bit awkward. The frame of the elevational scale is thinner than the one of the other two boxes. The distance scale looks a bit lost so far away from the corner – generally distances of the legend boxes to the map borders and each other need adjustments. I'd probably cut away much more non-NY territory at the west, north and east – The state is so awkwardly shaped that you still should have plenty of space for your legend boxes. 4) Weird: Canada looks exactly like non-NY US states with mountains and the same kind of half-opaque masking, but it has no roads, rivers or settlements. Maybe just make it plain grey then? Lots of little things and none of them reason enough to oppose, but that's the kind of attention to detail that I'd like to see in a featured map. I guess I'll stay neutral for the moment, hoping that some of them may be addressed … --El Grafo (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@El Grafo: Thanks. I have updated the map taking onto accounts most of your comments. 1) Increased the font for "Canada" 2) Tried to improve the labeling 3) Moved the legends. I prefer not to cut the map as the map limits are fixed and if I cut by hand I will loose the precision 4) Added roads and cities. I deliberately avoided to put this data as it adds 3-4 MB of data but it is outside of the area of interest. Anyway, I agree that the map is nicer like this. --Ikonact (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Very good map, but I'd like to be able to blow it up to at least twice the full resolution of 2,811 × 2,000 pixels and see a lot more details, topographically, in terms of names of bodies of water (rivers, lakes, etc.), and in terms of towns. Long Island is very strangely devoid of towns, when several more would have fit easily. (How about Huntington, Port Jefferson and some on the South Shore?) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the comments. I would like to see also a higher resolution but Commons cannot handle the svg to pngs with higher than 2000-2500 pixels resolution. That's why I chose to use this resolution as optimal. I will try to add more details but I have to admit I find a bit difficult to understand the cities on Long Island. It looks like they are made of junction of several villages and this is not reflected in the geographical data I use for the map generation. I will try to work on this. --Ikonact (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I understand what you mean about cities in Long Island. There are counties, then towns, which are really sub-county divisions, and then the towns can be divided into villages and hamlets. That said, the village of Hempstead (as opposed to the much larger town of Hempstead) had a population of 53,891 in the 2010 Census and should definitely be included on the map. The hamlet of Huntington had a population of 18,406 in the 2010 Census. So basically, the terms "village" and "hamlet" have nothing much at all to do with population in Long Island. I think it's a real problem that higher resolution isn't possible. Is there anything that can be done about that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support That looks like a nice map. I do agree with some point of El Grafo's thorough review, but I wonder if a fix wouldn't make it weirder. My complaint is that you should specify more widespread backup font for small labels (when I open the SVG in Chrome, the names are displayed using serif fonts, Times New Roman I believe). If you make it an SVG, I guess it's for people to use the SVG and not the PNG version rasterized on Wikimedia's servers, which has the proper fonts. I would also make "CANADA" bigger, to better emphasize the hierarchy. - Benh (talk) 16:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Benh: Thanks. all comments are welcome. I will change the back-up font to sans-serif.--Ikonact (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes there's issue with using mediawiki's builtin rasterization process (I tried to render the map at 4000px width with no success), but the fact there's no prerendered output larger than 2000px has nothing to do with the map itself. Native 2811px width also available btw. If you use a decent browser, it should also render the svg properly for you to enjoy the tons of details in this map. - Benh (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I think the map is insufficiently detailed for FP. Very few names of lakes and rivers are given, for example. I expect those on any thorough relief map. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is just me, but if I want the names of every single item of a map and a zoom which reveals more actual details, I'd check Google Map (or OSM). That's what these are for. It would have been very cluttered at nominal size to label everything. This maps also focuses on NY state (as per its title). - Benh (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're asking yourself the wrong question. Again this is no topo map. It serves different purpose. No one goes hiking with this, and no topographic map of the size of the whole state would illustrate an article about "NY State". - Benh (talk) 18:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The question of how many details to include is always relevant in any map. As I said, the number of identified bodies of water is insufficient for me, and there should also be a few more towns. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I would like to support this, as I have lived so much of my life in different areas of this map, including currently. But ... why does Interstate 86 disappear from the map east of Binghamton? NY Route 17 is now designated as I-86 all the way to the I-84 junction near Middletown? I can understand if the cartographer wants to highlight only interstate highways but ... Route 17 has existed as a limited-access route through the Catskills and Delaware Valley for years ... surely the map should reflect this?  Support now Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support - Thanks for contributing this to Commons. I want to err on the side of supporting, because it seems quite competently done and I don't think I've seen a user-created map at FPC before. I'm learning a bit from this thread (e.g. that svgs have fonts built in and that mediawiki has a hard time with larger svgs). My only comment is to ask why Jersey City, Stamford, and Elizabeth are in the same dark font as NY cities, while the other cities of NJ and CT are grayed out? — Rhododendrites talk13:57, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • To be accurate, SVG has no font built-in. We specify the font we want to use in the SVG (which is only a text file). If the computer rendering it has the font then it will be used. Otherwise, it uses a backup font (if specified) and resorts back to a default font of the renderer's choice, and amongst the ones present on the computer. The PNG of the description page are rendered on Wikimedia Foundation's servers and the text are outputted using the fonts there. If you look at the SVG directly, the fonts are chosen amongst the ones on your own computer. That is why it is always good practice to specify backup fonts which are widespread (Times New Roman, Arial, Courrier...) - Benh (talk) 18:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Dinkum (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - I still think you can add a few towns (technically, villages or hamlets) on the South Shore of Long Island (such as perhaps Patchogue) and a place like Oneonta upstate, but I think this is a very good map for the whole state now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Strong support This is the encyclopedic style of maps that have been really polishing off articles like en:New York (state), and have added there a level of professionalism and standardization that we were missing. The other state maps ikonact has made are also worthy of recognition here. My only comment/question with this specific file, is whether there is place or level of zoom to note the names to the two Canadian provinces, Quebec and Ontario. I ask just because the caption we use on New York (state) says "New York is bordered by five U.S. states, two Great Lakes, and the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec." I'd be very happy to see this promoted.-- Patrick, oѺ 14:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Nice map. Having lived close to New York (Boston), I really miss the 6 hour drive to the Big Apple. --Boothsift 06:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Small detail: Between 2011 and 2015 Albany's population grew beyond 100.000. Therefore, it should have the same font as Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo. Also, Newark and Jersey City deserve the bigger font, too. -- Axel (talk) 06:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Axel Tschentscher: Thanks for the comment. I used the 2010 US census as reference. This is the most recent official census. I can use estimates from the US Census Bureau, but the estimates data shows that Albany has never reached 100 000. I agree on the remark for Newark and Jersey City font but this is a choice I made. A smaller font allows better readability as these cities are outside of the area of interest. Otherwise I think the map will be overloaded around New York. --Ikonact (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 11:34:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tour Corbières – part of the battlements of the former bishopric in Rodez, Aveyron, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 08:56:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waxing half moon over Brofjorden
  • I'll have to get back to you on that. Right now we have a power blackout for all of Lysekil Municipality. Only batteries and backup generators for powering the mobile phone network. I'm writing this sitting by a kerosene lamp. Rather cosy. No moon though since it's raining. :-) --Cart (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, I'm back in the 21th century. The small tilt is fixed and a very, very, light NR is in place. I don't want to give it too much and lose the detail in the photo. With small sensor cameras it is so easy to overdo the NR, so I'm usually very restrained when it comes to that. I'll rather keep some noise than make it all plastic looking. --Cart (talk) 19:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's 64mm in FF equiv. So probably it is Jupiter (would have been to close to be Saturn anyways in 23mm). Sorry sorry. - Benh (talk)
  • I have 44 shots of this scene taken during a 30 minutes timeframe with the clouds moving rather rapidly over the sky (plus a bunch of other shots in other directions). During all that time, this was the only really bright planet in the sky. Had any other planet been hidden behind these clouds, it would have been visible in some of the other shots. This is a straight from camera (I haven't processed them all yet, hence the rather blue tone the camera's internal image processor loves to add) taken later when the cloud had moved a bit. It's from a slightly different position so a light is seen here that was obscured by a cliff in the first shots. I was playing around with framing, time, format, etc. Did you really think I would go on a shoot like this and take only one photo? :-) --Cart (talk) 21:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't doubt you are careful enough. I just read a caption ("it is most likely Jupiter") leaving little room for doubt, so I help checking, that's all. I'm often too hasty, but I also often correct myself when I see I'm wrong, no worries ;) Sorry again for the trouble (if any). - Benh (talk) 16:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nah Benh , that's ok no trouble. I wrote like that since I think it's prudent to invite others to check if something is outside your area of expertise, especially when we have access to so many talented people here. It was only your implication that I hadn't checked the rest of the sky and under the clouds for possible other planets during the session that bugged me a bit. If part of a photo is hard to see or obscured for some reason, it's always best to just ask if there are any other versions from the shoot that can clarify things. No hard feelings. :) --Cart (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 09:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The ornate ceiling of Ālī Qāpū palace porch in Isfahan, Iran.
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 10:05:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:35, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 18:09:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Commerce Square, Lisbon, Portugal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 20:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

M/S Diana
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
  •  Info Night view of the historic passenger ship Diana in Gothenburg habour. March 15, 1931, the Göta Canal Steamship Company’s new passenger and cargo ship, the M/S Diana was delivered from the Finnboda shipyard in Stockholm. The ship was designed to travel the Göta Canal between Gothenburg and Stockholm and is still in regular service between Gothenburg and Stockholm. The ship played an important role in the 1965 crime novel Roseanna by Swedish writers Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 20:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- ArildV (talk) 20:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Really beautiful, but just a small question about licenses. To me it looks like this is the same photo you have posted on Flickr. If so, that photo has "copyright all rights reserved" and here it is published under {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. I don't think one photo (if it is the same photo and size) can be published under two licences. Can you and/or someone who knows stuff about licenses sort this out, please. --Cart (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is that right Peulle? I did release some of my photos under different licences before (typically when CC was inappropriate license for a publication/book and I was asked by authors for a different license.). I don't know so I'm genuinely interested. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, copyright laws may differ from country to country, so I'm not sure it applies everywhere, but the isue here is that an image that has been released with a free license can't have a restricted license somewhere else. When uploading to Commons, note that the release form says that you irrevocably release it under that license. Meaning you have given up the copyright (under certain conditions); the point is that you cannot then claim copyright over that same image anywhere else. :) --Peulle (talk) 16:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Peulle, sorry but what you wrote is just totally wrong. See Commons:Multi-licensing. Your argument is a bit like saying that because you are selling a book for £9.99 at one shop, you can't sell it for £12.99 at another. The licence document is just a generous offer to the re-user. You can make different offers elsewhere, just like you can sell a book for different amounts in different places. You have never given up the copyright unless you use a CC0 declaration to do so. You haven't "given up copyright (under certain conditions)" with a CC licence and yes you can claim copyright elsewhere because your copyright still exists. The CC BY SA licence has in big shouty letters: "THE WORK IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW. ANY USE OF THE WORK OTHER THAN AS AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS LICENSE OR COPYRIGHT LAW IS PROHIBITED." Indeed the "perpetual" aspect of the licence is actually constrained because when copyright no longer applies (XX years after you have died) the licence is void and no longer required. So the licence only exists while it is under copyright and can only be offered because the licensor owns the copyright. Any re-user is also required to publish your copyright notices, to remind everyone it is under copyright and merely licensed. Flickr doesn't offer many options for users to pick from. For example, they are still stuck at V2.0 of CC BY-SA. The folk on Commons who scrape photos off the internet, rather than uploading their own, face this issue all the time: one website claims "(c) all rights reserved" and another claims "(c) some rights reserved CC BY-SA 4.0".
The TLDR version is just chill. People are allowed to be inconsistent. -- Colin (talk) 10:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree, you can publish under multiple licences, though technically "(c) all rights reserved" isn't a licence and is an inconsistent declaration when you have conditionally waived some rights elsewhere. Though some admins on Commons do need reminding that our images still do belong to us and are fully under copyright protection when licence conditions are not met. But I don't think there is anything legally wrong with it. You are simply telling one audience (Flickr) a different message to another (Commons). Diliff published all his cathedrals on Flickr with a -NC licence. Podzemnik you can offer as many licences as you like. Many older images on Commons are multiply licensed with GFDL and CC BY-SA. Any re-user has to pick one licence, though. (Just to be clear, the "(c)" bit isn't inconsistent and I put it on all my photos) -- Colin (talk) 07:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 20:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Cristallo mountain from Faloria, Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy.
Funny how when I put them next to each other I feel like the trees in the foreground add more to the picture than the shadow that I was missing. Also funny how all of us (assumed) are always hunting vantage points where nothing impedes the view but sometimes it works out better with a bit of distraction in the frame. In any case thank you for the link but I'm even happier with my pick for this FP nom than I was before. :) -- KennyOMG (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support As far as I can tell, this is a single frame not a stitched panorama, so the gap is presumably there in reality. I actually like the panorama version better, but yes, this is FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 09:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Belluno

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2019 at 17:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Picadilly Circus 2015
Two possibilities: hundreds of photos, or long exposure. But according to the traffic lights I guess the first one. -- -donald- (talk) 06:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Many photos (more dozens than hundreds for sure), be a little patient when there are people. It is very easy to pick the empty version of overlapping area when you have carefully shot the raw source photos. But there's no secret: the hardest part is to get there early. - Benh (talk) 16:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm afraid what you think is an "overcast" was due to my processing. I think it was sunny. You can see shadows, that I have mitigated. Overcast would have made it much easier to shoot. - Benh (talk) 17:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 22:24:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cannon at the main entrance of the Hôtel des Invalides, Paris, France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 19:03:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

the Wallfahrtskirche Maria Schnee in Östen-Tyrol-Austria

 I withdraw my nomination Thanks for all reviews --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2019 at 08:34:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

3D model of a Brown algae
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2019 at 09:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

D653 Languedoc (ship, 2016)
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2019 at 03:30:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An aquamarine-colored water pool in the Bumpass Hell hydrothermal area, Lassen Volcanic National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 05:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2019 at 06:48:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bubo scandiacus (Linnaeus, 1758), Snowy owl; Zoologischer Stadtgarten Karlsruhe
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 19:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2019 at 09:23:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oljaytu mihrab in Jameh mosque of Isfahan
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 19:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2019 at 14:38:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gymnadenia densiflora
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:26, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2019 at 20:35:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jules Verne
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 14:30:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 10:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 20:05:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old stock exchange in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2019 at 12:47:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexei Leonov in April 1974, the year before the launch of Apollo–Soyuz Test Project
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 16:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration#Astronauts

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 12:01:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling detail of Ivanovo Railway Station
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 16:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 07:55:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Snake skin molt
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Boothsift 16:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2019 at 01:01:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rouge park trail panorama
Good catch, thanks, will get to it later today. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Ermell --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding your last point, the area is on a glacial moraine, resulting in undulating topography, so you wouldn't get a perfectly straight horizon there. It was more obvious before I cropped a big chunk on the right. The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /--Boothsift 16:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 05:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Impatiens glandulifera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 22:48:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stora Nyckelviken in Sweden
Confirmed results:
Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 05:57:23
SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your reviews, I was debating on this nomination myself--Boothsift 07:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 07:53:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Weinberg in Kefermarkt with surrounding area
  • The terrain is sloping, this is the natural prospect of this landscape, please take a look on the verticals of the castle. Sharpness mainly comes from wide-angle-lens, taken on tripod, but I reduced as proposed.
  • You've made a comprehensive criticism of the composition, so of course I don't take issue with that, but I don't think the castle is the "main subject", just the most prominent building in a larger landscape. If Isiwal had wanted to focus on just the castle as the subject, the photo would be much more narrowly defined on the castle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 15:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Iris Calderhead
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 14:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 10:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 05:34:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone house of the anthropologist Julio César Tello in Marcahuasi, Peru
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is smaller than the minimum required size of 2 megapixels. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Cart (talk) 06:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2019 at 07:20:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tuberous pea - Lathyrus tuberosus
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 17:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 09:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grass snake - Natrix natrix
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Colubridae (Colubrids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2019 at 05:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 06:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 15:11:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Answer: @Axel Tschentscher: we went into the mountains of Switzerland with an archaeologist for a week. He knows the area like the back of his hand. All the photos that I have taken that contain something special, I first send to that archaeologist. He then makes the description with that photo. I then place that description under the photo. I think the description is correct! I therefore assume that the text is correct.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 14:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 21:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2019 at 14:28:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The ceiling of Chehel Sotoun's mirror hall
@W.carter: Sorry. I didn't know that. Hanooz 15:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hanooz: Don't worry, most of us learned things this way, through our mistakes. There is so much to learn at FPC and overall you are doing well. You are a great addition to the gang here, nominating good photos and not being offended when you are corrected about some minor technicality. Thanks for contributing! --Cart (talk) 15:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your kindness. I'm learning from you and others here. Hanooz 15:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2019 at 07:12:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trees around Brastad soccer arena in fog
  • @Benh: Easy to say it looks random even when the compo was chosen very carefully to get interesting trees while at the same time avoiding the glare of one lamp by the street to the right and get the floodlights around the field partially covered by trees so they wouldn't get too glary. As for the color, there are always questions about how to render sodium lights since cameras often have some difficulty picking up the exact right color. I've been there before and remembering those comments, I made a quick rendition of the light as soon as I got home and still had the scene fresh in my mind and I could set the color by using the normal (orange-y) sodium light shining on the road in front of the arena. When I got to the arena the sky was still blue, the floodlights had not warmed up yet and the fog was very thick (1). As time went by the fog thinned out a bit, the sky turned black and the floodlights became hotter and more yellow than orange. When I took this photo, the ambient light over the arena had turned almost green since the light from the floodlights was reflected from the plastic AstroTurf of the field up into the fog, giving the scene this strange yellow-green light. Normal grass isn't this reflective. You can follow how the light changed in the 1-18 photos in the series. --Cart (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sometimes, trying to squeeze everything in just isn't the right thing to do. Thanks for the explanations on the colours. I like the orange on blue version better (and aside, they are complimentary colours). That wasn't the main reason why I opposed. - Benh (talk) 20:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Benh: I can totally respect if you don't like the compo, that is fine, it was the comment about the color that made me defensive since I went to great lengths to get it right. The raw was even more totally green since the camera read the sodium lights as 'white'. Yes, blue and orange are nice together, I guess you weren't around for the blue/orange doping thing. :) --Cart (talk) 20:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 01:07:46
Khlong Lan Waterfall

Result: 15 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. --Cart (talk) 08:16, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 01:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stormy sunset over Waimakariri River basin, New Zealand
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 00:31:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tad Hang waterfalls at sunset, Bolaven Plateau, Laos
  • This is a 3 seconds photograph. The water is frozen yes, due to the long exposure. I like it like this personally, but even if I had preferred it fluid like moving, at this late sunset that would not have been possible at low ISO (here 50) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • actually I do agree, somehow, with the criticisms. 3 sec is maybe a tad too long. Half a second gives a vert nice motion already without "smearing" everything. It's a matter of tastes, but I'm not getting your iso50 comment? you could have made it shorter by bumping ISO up. - Benh (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 00:35:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yasaka-dori early morning with street lanterns and the Tower of Yasaka (Hokan-ji Temple), Kyoto, Japan
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Japan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 06:56:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blossoming of white rhododendron on the Khidotani ridge with mountain Tebulosmta on the background, Pshav-Khevsureti National Park, Mtskheta-Mtianeti region, Georgia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 05:09:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • For what it's worth, I definitely see Ikan's point, I thought the same when I looked at it first-off. It seems to me that the focus might have been slightly missed on the chancel and that the sharpness has been increased to compensate. It looks better when downsized to around 6.5 mpx, but it's definitely the weakest of the set. I wasn't sure whether I'd support after only having looked at that one, but decided after viewing the others that overall the set together makes it to FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 18:03:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral-Basilica of Mary, Queen of the World, Montreal, Canada.
  • I tend to agree a lot. It's more that there's a bias toward sharp pictures. Church interiors and, to a higher extent, ceilings are easy topics to shoot sharp, so we have heaps of them, and they are often promoted. - Benh (talk) 18:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 20:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria.
  • Not sure the crop was necessary tbh, but it doesn't affect my support. However, would it be possible to keep the original as a separate file, as in some ways I prefer it? Cmao20 (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cmao20, one of the (additional) reasons why I followed Benh's advice was because I had already uploaded another file with more crop and landscape format. This one I will definitely not crop, maybe this in is what you are looking for: File:Catedral de Salzburgo, Salzburgo, Austria, 2019-05-19, DD 30-32 HDR.jpg --Poco2 11:53, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, that's a nice one too. Cmao20 (talk) 12:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're right, of course, as far as biological taxonomy is concerned. From a linguistic - and especially an iconographic - point of view, there are some differences. Not that it would matter much for this nom :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 19:21:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winter on the alpine pasture Resciesa in Gherdëina, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:34, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 00:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone house of the anthropologist Julio César Tello in Marcahuasi, Peru
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 10:36, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 02:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lophocampa caryae
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:37, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Erebidae_(Erebid_Moths)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 02:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Myocastor coypus (coypu, nutria) in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France)
Yes that was it. But it was not me, I only give bread to attract them. Gzen92 [discuter] 07:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question - For an FPC nomination of a great portrait you took of a squirrel in your yard, I thought you mentioned you fed him so that you could get a better portrait. Please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see a number of sources listing melons as something nutria eat, to the point of being considered a pest to melon farmers. But if we're just going to say that it wouldn't eat melons if humans weren't nearby, that's starting down a path into very gray area. Many species now only exist in relation to humans. Others have their diet modified by what humans make available. For example, squirrels probably wouldn't encounter little piles of seeds, probably of various types that may or may not grow where it lives (I am of course making an assumption that it was some store-bought medley of bird seed, which may not be the case, or may be carefully chosen to replicate exactly what squirrels eat in that particular habitat). — Rhododendrites talk03:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • So it sounds like cantaloupe isn't a harmful food for nutrias. Whether it's a good idea to feed an invasive species is another question, but that the food is not appropriate for the species, I'd have to see documentation for. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you want to withdraw your hosting of this nomination, I'll gladly take it over. I think it's totally absurd to deny a photograph a feature because the photographer admitted to feeding this species of animal on other occasions and not this occasion. Let's be straight about the implications of that. Does it mean Gzen92's pictures, or perhaps animal pictures only, can never be featured? If so, since Charles also admitted feeding a wild squirrel in order to get a better picture, should that picture be stripped of its FP status, and should all his other nominations be automatically failed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • But if you don't support the photo anymore because the photographer admits to feeding nutrias bread at other times, go ahead and oppose and I'll take over the nomination. Just don't withdraw before I have a chance to do that. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ikan Kekek: Were you interpreting my sentence the wrong way ... Did you not ask me to oppose this image and hand it over to you? Wait, didn't this already happen before. How did that go? Well, this conversation has turned the wrong direction. --Boothsift 07:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:36, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 10:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Podilski Tovtry National Nature Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:52, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 07:29:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grey-headed Flying Fox
  • Answer: No - just the edge of the pond or maybe a tree. In some locations the flying foxes come in groups, especially if its hot and there's a large colony. In this case it was just infrequently, one at a time, given that its just a very small colony and not yet summer. --Bald white guy (talk) 09:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Chiroptera (Bats)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 08:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gymnadenia odoratissima
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:50, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 10:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of the dome of the Shah Mosque, Isfahan, Iran
✓ Done fixed. Hanooz 12:11, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
By another photographer: File:Shah(Emam ) Mosque , Isfahan.jpg. Hanooz 19:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That composition could also be an FP if done in high resolution. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:52, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 14:21:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Phyllidia elegans
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 04:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 21:55:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

 Comment Rhododendrites Because that is a continuation of photographs and according to the rules, they can all go if they are related, but if you think it is better to just put one, I have no problems, the last image on the right. -- LLs (discussion) 02:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I didn't mean to imply it was against the rules. It is certainly within the rules. The sequence itself, to me, just seems very minimal as compared to the content of any one of these individually, which don't seem that different from one another. We'll see what others say, though. — Rhododendrites talk02:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The title and description are wrong. This is not the first female space walk. It's the first all-female space walk. The first woman to walk in space was Svetlana Savitskaya in 1984 when she space walked with a man. Seven Pandas (talk) 02:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Seven Pandas Correct, but this is the first where there are only women, so it is recognized as a historical event, the same American government recognized it as such. -- LLs (discussion) 02:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - The fact that Trump called it the first female spacewalk - I hope that isn't your reason for using the term. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Ikan Kekek No, the detail of the difference between the first woman to make a walk (1984) and the first space walk made only by women (2019) has already been added. -- LLs (discussion) 03:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Language is important for image titles. As stated above, having a space walk by only women is called an "all-female space walk" in English and that is how this is decribed in media. "First female space walk" is the first time a woman in any company makes a space walk, there is a difference, so in this case the set title is wrong. --Cart (talk) 06:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Even though I'm clearly biased about this event (Jessica Meir's mother is Swedish, so this is huge in media here), I don't see this as a good set nom. The images are only slightly different, and in any other environment they could almost be seen as just zooming in on a subject. Having three images seems superfluous. First human on the moon was also huge and it didn't get a set nom. I would recommend that you {{withdraw}} this and select one image for a single nom. The titles of the images are also incorrect English and should be changed from "female" to "all-female" per my comment above. --Cart (talk) 06:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Agree Cart. Plus the photo on the left isn't good at all. Seven Pandas (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Firstly I don't think this meets the requirement of a "set" nomination. The point of a "set" nomination is that one can describe the criteria for a finite number of images. Front/back; day-time/evening/night-time. This is just three images arbitrarily taken where the women are posing for the camera. Us photographers have lots of such sets on our hard discs, and typically pick one from them that is the best. I'm not really seeing any one of them at FP level. If the "spacewalk" is the "wow" then, well, they aren't space walking. I think generally that historic events are best nominated sometime afterwards. This gives plenty time to collect some photos and distance to judge objectively. -- Colin (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per above. Interesting event, but I'm not sure why we need three FPs of it, and it's not very coherent as a set. I'm not sure any of these quite have sufficient wow for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Seems like three selfies with little value. At least make it look more important, these have no wow and I wouldn't be able to tell what was going on without an explanation. --Boothsift 00:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Cart and others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2019 at 19:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dover Castle - view from southeast

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 10:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 07:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 19:24:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fisherman on Inle Lake in Myanmar
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 19:42:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling fresco in the former abbey church St. Peter and Dionysius Koster Banz created by Melchior Steidl about 1715
  •  Comment - I'm judging based on the observed size of the frescoes at full size, not the number of megapixels. If there were more of a closeup, I'd be happy to judge it based on sharpness at less than full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 15:00:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Answer: the photo shows a natural process. The birch branch was already dead. The mushroom has used it. The mushroom is now also dying. All that between (Dead) autumn leaves. How beautiful can the natural cycle be.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 20:02:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Lake Tekapo in Canterbury Region, South Island of New Zealand
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 13:18:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  weak support On a second thought, it's hard to oppose. Colours are really nice, and I'm not sure how I would have shot it otherwise. The metro is also a nice additional touch. - Benh (talk) 16:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 16:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Édouard Manet
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2019 at 18:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Adult Nothern Gannet (Morus bassanus), on the Nothern island of Heligoland, Germany
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Cart (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 05:08:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Phare du Cap Leucate (Cap Leucate lighthouse), Leucate, Département Aude, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 06:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faloria cable car, Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 10:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 20:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2019 at 18:07:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Ivar, please don't display any other files on a nom. It is usually read as an "Alternative" by the FPC Bot and can cause trouble when closing the nom. Use a link, I have fixed this for you. --Cart (talk) 19:54, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2019 at 01:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hattie Caraway
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 05:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2019 at 11:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The "Hochaltar" in a church in Austria.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 05:29:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainbow cape by Christopher Bailey/Burberry, Camp: Notes on Fashion at The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 11:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Naqsh-e Jahan square from the Qeysarie vault
If the edits are not constructive we can simply revert to the earlier versions. If they are I can send an email to the uploader and ask him to upload a bigger version. Hanooz 13:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hanooz:This kind of editing are not welcome here at FPC nor in WLM. WLM contest's rules there are clear, and this kind of editing is clearly violating them. Reverting that edit doesn't make things fine again. I'm only ready to change my vote if the photographer assures you that no other images are edited like this one was or in that case that a new version is uploaded where deceiving edits are reverted. The photographer should take this seriously, if we find such an editing again in any other of the images submitted to WLM I'd recommend the other members of the jury not to let pass any of the photographer's images. Poco2 15:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Poco a poco He says this one's clouds are also from another image and this one is edited as he mentioned in the caption. Hanooz 16:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks, Hanooz, I  Support now Poco2 16:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 13:43:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:18, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 10:04:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red Wing (Turdus iliacus)
  • You need to add such info to description on the file page not here; this page will be archived in 9 days, the info and the corresponding categories needs to be where people will see it all the time. This goes for your other nomination as well. Take a look at this file as an example of what good description and categorization looks like. --Cart (talk) 19:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 19:45:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Isaac Lake during golden hour, moments before a storm
✓ Done found it, thank you! --Trougnouf (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 15:04:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Doors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2019 at 15:01:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the castle of Estaing, Aveyron, France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2019 at 15:07:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Massif de Lherz from Port de Bassiès in Parc naturel régional des Pyrénées ariégeoises, commune of Auzat, Ariège, France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 08:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old tree in "Dead Vlei", Namibia
I actually had the tree in the centre of the original shot, and then cropped it like that because it seemed too central to me. You can take a look at the original version of the image to see what it looked like. If you prefer that one, I'm happy to provide it (or a similar crop) as alternative. --Domob (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Here's the thing: we have a surprising number of very similar FPs from the same area: 1, 2, 3, 4. I do rather like this one, and like the striking colors, but when comparing, the colors do look much more orange in this one. Might it be a different spot with a different mineral composition? Was the light that different (looks to have been around the same time of day as #3/4)? To be clear I'm neutral-leaning-support at this stage. — Rhododendrites talk23:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but I personally think that this shot looks much better than at least 3, 4 (who look rather bland to me). I like the other two (1, 2) a lot better, but still think that my nomination has more "wow" at least to me. That's why I nominated it. But of course all this is purely subjective, and I'm probably less experienced as a photographer than most of you. --Domob (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It was early morning light, but I agree that it was too red/yellow. Corrected the WB. --Domob (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]

 Comment I agree the noise in the sky is a bit annoying. I did not apply any sharpening to it, though. --Domob (talk) 05:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I've made the top-left corner a bit brighter now, so it matches the overall sky more evenly. I tried to reduce the noise in the sky, but unfortunately that always also hurts legitimate details in the picture, so I didn't do any noise reduction in the end. --Domob (talk) 05:02, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - Domob, that's probably an improvement, but ping everyone now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kreuzschnabel, Poco2, Basotxerri - please take a look at the new version and the alternative crop. I may have some time on Sunday (but not before) to give the noise in the sky another try as well. --Domob (talk) 16:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would really prefer you to withdraw this nomination and place a new one so all users voting do so on the same image. You never get a clean voting with umpteen alterations through the period. --Kreuzschnabel 19:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An improvement, but half the way IMHO Poco2 20:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Poco2, there's a new version now with reduced noise in the sky (the rest of the picture is not affected at all). --Domob (talk) 11:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Noise is still there but it looks better, will now move to  Neutral Poco2 14:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Namibia
The chosen alternative is: File:Dead Vlei Tree central.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 02:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Impatiens capensis
I am a bit perplexed by this too :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2019 at 19:01:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tom Morello as supporting act for Muse in Bristol, UK.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2019 at 09:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dynamic imaging in Electric Capacitance Tomography
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 12:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Jewish cemetery in Cherniwtsi
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 15:15:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jameh Mosque of Isfahan is the grand, congregational mosque (Jāmeh) of Isfahān city, within Isfahān Province, Iran. It has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 2012.


  • @Poco a poco: I don't know how much time it takes for edit, but this is the only chance for this file to be featured, please do it, there are totally three oppose vote, all based on one comment (not sharp), if you can provide a sharp version, I hope their vote will be changed, thanks! -- Editor-1 (talk) 04:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Ok, no problem, I close it for you. All you need to do ist adding {{Withdrawn}} Poco2 18:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination -- Editor-1 (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2019 at 23:03:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis), Stockton Sandspit, New South Wales, Australia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 11:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magura village in Romania
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 22:54:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This new image of the reflection nebula Messier 78 was captured using the Wide Field Imager camera on the MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope at the La Silla Observatory, Chile. This colour picture was created from many monochrome exposures taken through blue, yellow/green and red filters, supplemented by exposures through a filter that isolates light from glowing hydrogen gas. The total exposure times were 9, 9, 17.5 and 15.5 minutes per filter, respectively.
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 03:32:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A large sukkah at Temple Emanu-El in New York City
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2019 at 19:07:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sectioned diagram of the planet Mercury including the solid "anticrust" layer between the mantle and core
  • Canvas size is irrelevant for SVG images because vector diagrams are scalable to any size; the only reference given in the description states specifically what other source was used to create this image and includes a link (I have now expanded this as well); the cosmetic stars are easy enough to remove, and I have done so. A loose necktie (talk) 03:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A loose necktie, while canvas size does not fundamentally matter, as SVG are scalable, it does seem to affect the default preview size on the file page, and the size you get when you click on the preview, which is rather small. Could you make it larger please so that the default preview is bigger? I think Wilfredor is asking for a reference for your interior parts. For example, "anticrust" is not mentioned on en:Mercury (planet) and Googling "mercury anticrust" turns up nothing relevant at all. The existing File:Mercury's internal structure1.jpg diagram used on Wikipedia includes depth information, which would seem to be worth having. I would expect solid references for the names of significant layers in the plant body, and for the thickness of each layer that is directly proportional to the displayed thickness on the diagram. -- Colin (talk) 08:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now I understand much, much better. Rescaling the image has a few effects: several of my SVG filters do not scale along with the image, so changing actual image size means having to use other filters here, but hopefully most of these will not matter. Regarding references for the content of the diagram: please see the current file description for these. I had tried reorganizing the content of this portion of the Wikipedia article to include mention of this layer, but my edit was reverted wholesale and the information went along with it. Still, my diagram is no less accurate for all this, yes? Thank you for the explanations! A loose necktie (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Colin for your clarification, please, A loose necktie take a look to my edition here which shows the proper way to add references. Also, you could take a look to Referencing for beginners. Btw, I think it is only necessary to reduce the font size and remove the last text you added that could go in the description of the image. Regards --Wilfredor (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2019 at 13:59:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young leaves of a blackberry plant. Stacked with Helicon Focus from 32 frames
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 03:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Rosaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 17:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common pigeon (Columba livia).
  • @Ikan Kekek: Geolocation is mandatory for VI, at FP we don't have a rule like this – it's more like a "nice to have" in most cases. Personally, I sometimes ask for it if I consider it important for the subject, but wouldn't insist on it for a picture like this. After all, this is an incredibly common species, and with the background blurred like this there are no clues as to where the picture was taken anyway. It could be a scene from almost any city in Belgium (or on the planet). --El Grafo (talk) 06:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 03:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order_:_Columbiformes_(Pigeons_and_Doves)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2019 at 20:54:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 03:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2019 at 13:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eileen Collins at the commander's station on Space Shuttle Columbia
Yes, true she became the first female pilot in two earlier missions before this one. But she also became the first female commander (a higher rank) in this mission pictured. She is pictured here at the commander's station on day 1 of her historic mission. She also commanded a later mission a few years after this. Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 03:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration#Astronauts

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2019 at 15:58:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windows at the western wing of castle hotel in Velden, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 31 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 03:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Other windows

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2019 at 21:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2019 at 08:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2019 at 21:34:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2019 at 16:18:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2019 at 05:30:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2019 at 18:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Adult dark-bellied brant (Branta bernicla bernicla) on the Northern German island Amrum
  •  Oppose Lead room is missing. Too much space behind and not enough at the left, in my view. Also not very large resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:53, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support There are cases in that the lead room would give the wrong expression. The goose has no certain goal but it is fleeing. It wants to get away from maybe a danger, get out of sight (perhaps of the camera ;-) ) or out of reach. This is such a case. The rippling water behind it underlines the scene. --Hockei (talk) 06:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • +1, excellent example of "breaking the rules" with a purpose. Well, actually this "running out of the frame" composition with negative space behind the protagonist is a pretty common way of expressing urgency in comics and cartoons. And if that doesn't convince, have a look at the ISO 7010 emergency exit sign ;-)  Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:06, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]