Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2021 at 13:23:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black Lives Matter mural in Greenpoint, Brooklyn
My opinion above used to be more (ahem) common here. Go ahead, !vote if you want, but I'm not going to at present. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]




Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2021 at 17:31:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bird mosaic by Jean-Michel Folon
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2021 at 13:33:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blackpoll warbler in the fall
  • @Aristeas: Thanks. It's also a different species. :) They are both yellow this time of year, but blackpoll warblers are in a different family and less than half the size of scarlet tanagers. I presume Basile Morin was just comparing them because they were two of my nominations with similar colors. — Rhododendrites talk13:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2021 at 20:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bust of Caracalla AD 212 in the National Archaeological Museum, Naples.
  •  Comment Thanks for your review. I guess there is nothing wrong with the lens. Probably you didn't notice that the picture was taken with 1600 ISO for the light conditions and I'm not supposed to use a tripod in this museum. The noise reduction obviously reduced the sharpness. But the point is that FPCs and photos should be evaluated for what they are and what they comunicate and not what they should be according to the more or less high end equipment. I'm very satisfied with it even on a 32'' screen as many other reviewers. Cheers--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2021 at 17:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

De Viron Castle
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Belgium

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2021 at 15:50:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the Falaises d’Aval in the near of the Chambre des Demoiselles to Étretat and the Porte d’Amont.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Normandy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2021 at 07:39:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2021 at 16:51:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of the National Museum of Slovenia
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Painted_ceilings
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2021 at 14:40:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Symmetry is of course impossible for the image on the right, seeing that the building is not symmetrical. But if that means it isn't FP in your view than that is fine. I included the image on the right because I like the view of the organ, I agree the one looking east is better but to me they both independently deserve the star. Cmao20 (talk) 16:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • For this kind of shot with a strong perspective effect guiding your eyes to the bottom of the image this does for me definitely play a role as there was symmetry there until you end up in that wall with the pipe organ off the center and the uninteresting wall. Poco a poco (talk) 07:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I agree, left is fine, but right one has bad compo, should be croped much better, left both glary windows out, crop till column, and some in bottom. Works much better. --Mile (talk) 08:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose very interesting and complete document, and Diliff is a great master for a lot of us. Ok. But. I respectfully oppose because the same ceiling has different colors in the two photographs. The distortion is too prominent at left : look, the chairs in foreground are long like sunbathing beds on the beach. By the way, all that chairs are uninteresting, I think a picture taken closer to the altar, from the limit of the choir’s seats for instance, would have given a more detailed view on the magnificent stained glass window (I know Diliff’s purpose is to provide complete views more than detailed). Right part looks a bit « flat » to me, especially in colors, due to the comparison with the left one. No problem with the « no symmetry », the church is as it is. In my opinion, the pipes of the organ deserve a special picture as it looks so wonderful. Thanks and sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Very sorry but per jebulon--Commonists 18:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure this vote is really possible - it will just confuse the bot which will interpret it as two separate votes one in favour and one against. I don't think there's a way that one can support one picture in a set and oppose another. I feel that the best thing to do would be to indicate whether you support or oppose the set as it stands, and then consensus will take its course. If the set does not pass, which appears quite possible, I will nominate the first image by itself. Cmao20 (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Left one i would support. One bad idea of making a set, since one bad spoil other good shots. I go by that code, not by majority. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @King of Hearts: For sure I oppose the set. I am not sure I’ll support the right part, neither the left, due to my previous rationales above. Anyway, I think a withdraw of the current set and an entire new process of nomination are necessary. If not, it will be confusing a lot.--Jebulon (talk) 10:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Comment With the voting concluded as of ten minutes ago, I make this a clear consensus in favour of the first image (at least 11 support, 4 oppose, though it is clear that if it had been nominated by itself most if not all of these opposes would not have happened) and a 10 support, 5 oppose ratio for the second image, which means that both pass. So by my sums the nomination succeeds, although someone will need to close it manually otherwise the bot will interpret King of Hearts's vote as if it were two votes and will automatically fail the nomination as 11 support, 6 oppose. I would prefer not to perform the close myself in the interests of transparency. Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apologies, the bit I struck through is nonsense and is the fault of me doing the maths wrong. The bot should correctly promote the nomination with an 11/5 score. But probably best for someone to check this manually anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I believe the score should be 13/2/0 for standalone, and 10/5/0 for the set. However, contrary to a normal nomination with alts, where both cannot be promoted and only the one with higher support should be promoted, here both can be promoted, so the correct outcome should be to promote the set with 10/5/0. -- King of ♥ 15:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 00:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Devil's Finger volcanic plug.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2021 at 05:09:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Super Heavy
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2021 at 09:01:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pilgrimage church Hafnerberg
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2021 at 10:36:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Timber-framing detail from the Palmsches Haus, Mosbach, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2021 at 07:14:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Replica of the Equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius at Piazza del Campidoglio in Rome at night, Lazio, Italy
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2021 at 15:28:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

City gate in Speyer (Germany)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2021 at 19:22:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close-up of leaves, from directly above, "In Glacier National Park," Montana
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
  •  Info created by Ansel Adams, uploaded by Kaldari, nominated by Yann (talk)
  •  Support Lovely leaves texture, by a famous photographer. -- Yann (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Stunning Seven Pandas (talk) 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose this specific digitally modified version with a local adjustment in the upper left corner (according to the RetouchedPicture Template at the bottom). Ansel Adams was a (maybe the) master of the darkroom print, inventor of the zone system. Careful manipulation of tones was his thing, doing print after print with minor tweaks until he got it just right. I think it's safe to assume that if he had wanted that milkiness in the corner removed he would have done that. Note that (similar to adding a vignette) reducing contrast at the edges is a method to make things in the centre "pop" more, so this may well have been done on purpose as an artistic choice. I don't think doing anything other than global adjustments on the scan (setting black and white points etc.) is appropriate here.
And even global adjustments should be done with great care. Some of the leaves in the third row that are clearly visible as mid-tones in the unedited version are now disappearing into the shadows (it helps to look at the files at some distance or smaller sizes in this case). Since the original scan seems to be of decent quality, unless you have the actual print in your hand for reference, it does not make sense to make any adjustments here at all, imo. --El Grafo (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El Grafo: Thanks for your detailed analysis. Should I offer the original image as an alternative? Yann (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: worth a try, I'd support it! --El Grafo (talk) 07:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Close-up of leaves, from directly above, "In Glacier National Park," Montana
  •  Oppose That's what NARA has freely offered so far. Sadly, high-res scans, with or without borders (not crucial to me) don't seem to be available. Adam's work should be PD by now, at least in many cases. Anyway, I don't consider this image to rank among Adam's finest or most exemplary photographs. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Genre-wise, Adams is mainly known for his black-and-white langscapes. But, as I wrote above, he's also a master of the darkroom printing process. I'm by no means an expert, and while I have shot a couple rolls of BW film in the last years, I have never done a print myself. That being said, I think this is an excellent demonstration on how to use tone (i.e. different shades of grey) to shape a BW photograph. The "negative vignette" has already been mentioned above. Notice how the different layers are separated by different tones all the way to the back where the bottom layer of fern is just about bright enough to clearly peek out of the deep shadows. Notice how there are clearly defined textures from the brightest highlights to all but the darkest shadows. And all of that from a single exposure (well, two if you count the print itself).
Also, in terms of composition, there is a surprising amount order/structure in what at a first glance looks like a random snap of some leaves. The shiny maple leaf in the centre is sitting on a foundation of more shiny leaves. The next layer of fern and conifers embraces the central leaf (follow the major lines of the twigs: they form a circle).
The white border is there, because this was hand-printed in the darkroom, not in a drug store's minilab. Adams did not crop it, so why should we? We don't crop excess borders of paintings or maps either.
The WOW in this image is not something that jumps straight at you from the first sight. It requires the viewer to investigate the image closely (the image as a whole, not the individual pixels/grains it is made of), and it may require some background knowledge. Maybe I'm biased because of its author, but you can see from this wall of text that I am very much WOWed by the amount of craftsmanship and skill that went into this seemingly simple image of a couple of leaves. --El Grafo (talk) 09:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Onocleaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2021 at 15:59:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-kneed dotterel
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Erythrogonys

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 08:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 14:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fagaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2021 at 12:10:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Picture of Jupiter in February 2020.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 14:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 07:21:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Raphael - The Alba Madonna
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 14:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 08:28:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male yellow-winged darter
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 14:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2021 at 14:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Illustration of Emperor penguin swimming in water.
  •  Info Ikan Kekek That would be a matter of opinion, to me the position of the bird indicates that it's diving deep. Also when talking about composing an image look at en:Rule_of_thirds, if you imaging a horisontal line thru the center of the body (it's diving down so it's not exact) it will be approximately one third up from the bottom. This is not a must rule but it works mostly. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 11:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2021 at 11:43:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A floral fantasy of animals and birds, Mughal art, India
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2021 at 08:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A sanderling (Calidris alba) on the beach of Spiekeroog (an island in the a Wadden Sea )
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2021 at 06:15:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swimmers in Ohepalu bog pool
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Estonia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2021 at 16:49:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Aufgang zum Kirchturm
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2021 at 21:05:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of the Saint George Basilica, Victoria, Gozo Island, Malta.
 Support now. The sunstars now look correct at their centres. Poco, I do still think you should ping all reviewers when you make a big change, not just those who commented negatively. For example, some may be upset about the widows. As we've seen on other noms, sometimes pleasing one person ruins the image for someone else. -- Colin (talk) 16:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was a good case to show that "Uncalibrated space" is an issue. Also, i knew you would push windows, since i was trying early. They were better in 1st shot, but they made maybe 5% of space where ceiling is 95 %. I would support if that would be covered manually, since software slicing won't. --Mile (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Malta

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2021 at 21:13:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC))[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2021 at 21:03:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lower Manhattan panorama
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2021 at 06:10:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Devil's Finger volcanic plug
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 14:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2021 at 14:48:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lotus bud
 Info I went to the original file of 2011 and made the best possible crop. It is larger now but not much Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 01:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2021 at 21:55:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 20:47:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

woman with gloves and stethoscope

 I withdraw my nomination Thank for all the feedback! Ciell (talk) 11:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 11:14:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise on the abandoned farmhouse - A dawn with delicate colors with the strip of fog, typical of autumn, in the splendid countryside of the Valdarno Fiorentino gives a sense of peace.
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 12:03:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spherical panoramic at the shore of Crestasee, Switzerland
Nothing specific (like use different frames for the panorama). But since it is just on the blue sky, I guess it would be straight-forward to edit it out with Gimp. I didn't bother to do that because it does not obstruct anything (i.e. is not "in the way") and I actually like the vibe it gives to the picture. I'm happy to try and edit it out though if you and others prefer that. --Domob (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your review! I see what you mean, and it does make sense. However, I also see value in spherical panoramics for being immersive in a nice place. Also the lake and the bordering trees take up at least 180 degrees of the FOV (not just a tiny portion). --Domob (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've worked on the lens flare and sky now. --Domob (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The online panorama viewer seems to be having issues (already for some months) and shows a very limited resolution/quality (plus the message you mention). This has nothing to do with the picture itself (and applies in fact to all spherical panoramics on commons I believe); you can use a standalone viewer application like Panini to view it in full quality. --Domob (talk) 09:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you'd like us to use a different viewer, could you include a link to it on your file page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk

) 19:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I'm not aware of another viewer that can just be linked (rather than having to install an application, download the file and open it with it). The one linked used to work in the past and seems to be the standard for commons (e.g. also used in a couple of Wikipedia articles directly). Note that this is something applying to all spherical panoramics on commons, nothing specific to this one. --Domob (talk) 09:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 07:06:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tel Aviv promenade
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Israel

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2021 at 16:21:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing Mud puddling activity of Charaxes kahruba (Moore,1895) – Variegated Rajah
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2021 at 19:07:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment Let me be specific: There needs to be a category for the rice, which I figure to be basmati rice. There needs to be a category for the cilantro. And whatever the nuts are on the left, they should have a category. A category for the chilis would also be nice but doesn't seem quite as essential. Once there is a sufficient number of categories, I will support. I might look for the categories myself, but I am very busy today. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you very much for your research @Ikan Kekek: I guess the garnish in the upper left seems to be not nuts, but some kind of dumpling or pastry, according to my research. Unfortunately, I could not determine this more precisely. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Food

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2021 at 18:50:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pietro Bembo - Titian - Museo di Capodimonte (Naples).jpg
  •  Comment Actually the photo is very sharp, you can see the canvas very well, it is not blurred but rather the style of Titian that is defined as "dirty" unlike other artists:"Titian was always highly regarded during these centuries as one of the great Old Masters, but critics during this time preferred Raphael, for his more obvious reverence for the art of antiquity.
This dispute between what is basically conservativism and progressivism stemmed from the differing opinions of draftsmanship during the Italian Renaissance. While artists like Raphael and Michelangelo preferred their paintings to be precisely drawn, precision was not as important to Venetian artists like Titian."[1], and anyway 30 mpx seem enough. Greetings.--Commonists 23:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's not that sharp at full or nearly full size, and I doubt that the kind of color noise I see is actually in small-groups-of-pixels or pixel-level areas on the painting. I love Tician's work, so it's not a question of my being unfamiliar with his style. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see it very clearly, then we simply see it differently. Greetings.--Commonists 00:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 20:03:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from Cape Alchak
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Crimea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2021 at 16:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of St. Sebastian, Setúbal, Portugal.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
  •  Info General interior view of the parish Church of Saint Sebastian (in Portuguese «Igreja Paroquial de São Sebastião»), Setúbal, Portugal. The original church of São Sebastião was a small hermitage, built around 1490 on the site of the current viewpoint of the city of Setúbal. The current parish church of São Sebastião, located in the Dominican convent, was founded between 1564 and 1566, in a work sponsored by D. Sebastião. The design of the temple is attributed to Afonso Álvares, royal architect who built the churches of São Roque, in Lisbon, and Espírito Santo, in Évora. The work of the church of São Sebastião de Setúbal stands out for the military design of its structure, certainly derived from the training of Afonso Álvares as a military engineer. The interior, with a single nave, has interconnecting side chapels, and was originally covered by a barrel vault, destroyed in the earthquake and replaced by a wooden roof. Although it is not a Jesuit temple, its design fits into an architectural typology disclosed by the Society of Jesus in the second half of the 16th century, resulting in a building of large proportions, with a large and bright interior space, preceded by an imposing and austere façade. Although it has undergone some structural changes, the church of São Sebastião can be defined as "a remarkable building in the evolution of Portuguese architecture in the second half of the 16th century" and is listed as National Portuguese Monument (Idem, p.50). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support A beautiful church, the light is good, the photo really impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 08:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Clear FP. I actually really like the wider crop here, it adds a bit of variety. Cmao20 (talk) 09:45, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support For the beauty of the subject and the technical excellence. Maybe the whole image should be slightly compressed horizontally, to minimize the distortion near the left and right borders. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Alvesgaspar: Thanks for the hint, I corrected the aspect ratio a bit Poco a poco (talk) 21:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Is it "corrected", though? The feature of a rectilinear lens and rectilinear projection of a stitched panorama, is that a flat surface perpendicular to the camera's point-of-view is rendered correctly in all proportions. So the far walls, and in particular the central paintings and figures, should be correct in the original. If they were correct, then the new version has stretched them vertically and gives a wrong impression of the proportions of the arch, etc. The side walls are of course stretched by this projection and not representative of reality. This is simply a consequence of a wide angle rectilinear, and the only solution is to narrow the angle-of-view either by cropping or standing further back when taking the photo. Or to accept and live with that distortion. I don't think we should just randomly go about changing the proportions of cathedrals so that already-distorted side walls look less bad. -- Colin (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nothing is corrected one way or another. All "photographic projections" are conventional plane representations of reality, just like when we project the spherical surface of the world on a plane. In mathematical cartography we choose a certain projection to preserve certain geometric properties, for example, relative areas or angles. Distortions of the other properties are inevitable. Thus I don't see the point in respecting the geometry of a rectilinear projection (or any other) when the goal should usually be to look right to our eyes (or less bad, as you say). -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • Rectilinear has properties concerning the facing wall that are highly advantageous and expected by the human eye: that the proportions of features of that wall (esp the painting and arch) are correct. By applying a strong aspect-ratio adjustment to this image, we have now ensured the image is misleading. FP rules state "Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable". The main subject of this image is now significantly taller than originally shot. I also think it is unacceptable that such a major adjustment was made without pinging those who have voted already. -- Colin (talk) 08:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Axel (talk) 20:09, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  strong oppose Undescribed and unwarranted digital manipulation of the main subject. -- Colin (talk) 08:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I would suggest that we discuss the question of aspect ratio changes separately, e.g. on the talk page, because it is a general question. It would be a pity if the discussion would spoil the nomination of this wonderful photo. Regarding this photo I would suggest just to return to the previous version in order to free it from the aspect ratio discussion; most of us have voted on the previous version anyway, so it seems the easiest solution to let run this nomination on that version. --Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • My oppose would change to support if the altered version was reverted. Though it would not be permitted per COM:OVERWRITE to just switch it back again after promotion, even if a consensus agreed it was preferable. As Aristeas notes, most people voted on the unaltered version. I'm not sure this needs a general discussion, because this is the first time I've seen anyone apply such a distortion to an architectural nomination. So it doesn't seem to be a general issue, just an odd decision here. FYI the adjustment wasn't small, it was a +46 Aspect Ratio change in Lightroom. -- Colin (talk) 10:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Colin I've reduced the aspect ratio to 50%. This image is no stitched panorama, but a single frame. I applied the aspect ratio to compensate the perspective correction of 47 degrees as after the perspective correction things were also streched out. Is this version good enough for a compromise? Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • Vertical perspective adjustment corrects for camera tilt and fixes the resulting distortion. It has zero effect at the centre (the central axis around where it appears to tilt the image). By applying a global aspect ratio adjustment, you have squashed the top, middle and bottom equally. It is just not a recognised architectural photography adjustment, and I don't think we should start doing it now. The stretching at the left and right borders that Alvesgaspar notices, are not "fixed" by also squishing the middle. The are just the consequence of your 16mm ultra-wide lens, which is significantly wider than a "standard". -- Colin (talk) 16:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sidenote: This is not not the first time that global aspect ratio changes for aesthetic reasons have been suggested or discussed on the FPC page; it has been done previously, and nobody complained when the result did look fine. --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Commonists 19:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 05:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2021 at 03:47:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A rooftop farm in the Lower East Side of Manhattan

 Support --IamMM (talk) 16:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 05:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Other

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2021 at 05:40:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Betulaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2021 at 11:11:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Part of the Great cascades, Bergpark Wilhelmshöhe, Kassel
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Other

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2021 at 15:17:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2021 at 21:48:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Upper Canada College
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2021 at 19:57:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mount Everest 3D Map by Tom Patterson, with English annotation
  •  Comment @Yann and Cmglee: Just for your information: AFAIK there is a bug in our FP bot. When a picture which is already a FP on some Wikipedia(s) becomes promoted to FP on Commons, the bot fails to add the necessary parameter to the {{Assessments}} template, so the description page of the picture will still look as if it was not featured on Commons. Therefore, if this picture gets promoted here, please go to the description page, search for the {{Assessments}} template and add the parameter featured=1. This means: Right now, the template reads {{Assessments|enwiki=1|enwiki-nom=Mount Everest 3D map}}, after promotion on Commons it should read {{Assessments|featured=1|enwiki=1|enwiki-nom=Mount Everest 3D map}}. Thank you very much for your help! --Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Asia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2021 at 17:23:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Herb-paris
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Melanthiaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2021 at 13:02:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Red Kerchief, by Claude Monet, Cleveland Museum of Art
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2021 at 14:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2021 at 22:11:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An air-cushioned landing craft transports Marine Corps equipment
OK, fine. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2021 at 05:09:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mackenzie River Outflow
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 09:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#North America

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2021 at 13:51:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Sugar factory (Cukrarna, Ljubljana)

Alt

[edit]

Old Sugar factory (Cukrarna, Ljubljana) version II, HHHR shot.

Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 09:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2021 at 07:18:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Worker with gas cylinders, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

 I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2021 at 15:00:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 20:16:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young sparrow on sunflower
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2021 at 16:14:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ciampac pond in Gherdëina
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 14:31:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 20:24:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bacchus by Caravaggio
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 19:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2021 at 05:13:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Danube Delta
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#Europe

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 21:25:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: numerous shortcomings including overexposure, tilt, small size, arbitrary framing/composition, and poor quality, besides of gallery, author, uploader and nominator not being mentioned as stated in the guidelines. --Kreuzschnabel 18:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Erithacus rubecula

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2021 at 08:54:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 08:19:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
  •  Info St.Julian's Church, in Portuguese "Igreja de São Julião", located on the centric Praça de Bocage (town hall quare), Setúbal, Portugal. The church was originally built in the second half of the 13th century in medieval style and was rebuilt at the beginning of the 16th century by order of King Manuel I in Manueline style. In 1531 a strong earthquake struck Setúbal and the church was damaged; the building was considerably modified in Mannerist style and reinaugurated in 1570. The original church was almost completely destroyed by the Great Earthquake of 1755 and was greatly rebuilt and redecorated in the last third of the 18th century following the late Baroque style. From this stage date the general appearance of the façade, the inner wooden roof, the painted tiles, the main and lateral altarpieces and the main chapel. The nave of the church is divided in three aisles by arches built during the Mannerist repair works following the 1531 earthquake. The columns are decorated in talha dourada (a typical Portuguese technique to decorate woodwork with gold leaves). Today it is the main church (matriz) of the city classified as National Monument in 1910. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support My first intention was to nominate to FP the ceiling candidate, but then I looked into the others and came to the conclusion that at the end of the day I'd also like to nominate them here, so I wonder whether it will work as a set nominating all of them at once. -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support for the entire set. The restrained lighting of the interiors gives the scenes an unobtrusive atmosphere with a focus on the essentials. Great shots! -- Radomianin (talk) 12:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Radomianin, sorry for pinging you again, this time the purpose is to let you know that I reduced the set to 2 images --Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose set. The nave would get a weak support -- there's a lot of grey stone and pews and the interior has less wow than many of our other examples. The altar also weak support. This view merely adds a 2x detail to the previous one, though the camera is closer too. The ceiling I'd oppose due to lack of wow. We have plenty "wow" ceilings and this one is plain and merely competently photographed. The detail I'd also oppose as being just a QI. Also there are many such tiled images around the church and this is only one of them, which doesn't fit well with a set nomination. I think we need to be careful set noms aren't just a random collection of some aspects of a building photographed by one photographer. The point of a set is completeness, not just a quick way to get four or five FPs from one building. -- Colin (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose good quality images, but per Colin. Imho this collection doesn't work as a whole --Ivar (talk) 14:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question For a set, the guidelines state "Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ." Thus I wonder what the "Detail of azulejos" is doing here. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, Basile Morin, I took that picture along with the main alter image out of the set, --Poco a poco (talk) 09:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I still think this is just two random photos you took inside the building. Would be better to nominate the nave on its own, and be happy with QI for the rest. And again, major changes are being made to a nom and the previous support voters not being informed. -- Colin (talk) 10:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It that statement applies in this case, it also does in probably 80% of all sets nominated here Poco a poco (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the ceiling is probably FP but I wonder why it is your favourite. To me it seems like the least interesting of the four. It is well captured of course but fairly plain, the light is quite nice but it isn't the most architecturally interesting. I would actually rank both of the images you have taken out of the set, higher than the two you have left in. Anyway, will start the altar nomination because it should definitely be FP. Cmao20 (talk) 08:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cmao20 I'd say that I like it for these reasons: it's different; I like the paintings on it; it's a valuable old wooden ceiling (most I know are made of stone) and I enjoy the arches framing it and the paintings you can see through them. Poco a poco (talk) 11:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2021 at 18:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eiffel Tower with rainbow
I know; it's meant as a suggestion to the nominator. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2021 at 15:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great blue heron
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Ardea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2021 at 14:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

MSU Zoological Museum in Moscow
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Russia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2021 at 08:07:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Train at Dawlish, England.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2021 at 08:10:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Portugal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2021 at 15:39:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goblet of Fire - a cocktail made with tequila, lemon zest with hint of chilli, served over a bowl of dry ice.
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Drinks

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2021 at 15:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2021 at 22:28:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Main nave of the church of the Monastery of Jesus, Setúbal, Portugal.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
  •  Info Main nave of the church of the Monastery of Jesus, Setúbal, Portugal. The monastery, founded in 1490, is one of the oldest buildings in Manueline style (Portuguese version of Gothic) and served as a monastery of Poor Clare nuns. Note: the high altar of this church is already FP. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Obviously excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support per Cmao20. I like it. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I know this is an old building, but I'm not sure the verticals are vertical. On the RHS window, the verticals lean out towards the top. The tiles on the RHS are hard to see but they lean in towards the top. Those on the LHS are easier to see and their vertical lines lean in towards the top by quite a large degree. You can also use the ornate golden repeated pattern on the tiles, which should be vertical on its centre-of-symmetry. There's also a tile pattern straight ahead, though it is possible that wall has a curve to it. The EXIF suggests a -21 vertical perspective correction and +1.3 perspective rotation has been applied. I wonder if that needs revisiting. -- Colin (talk) 08:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Colin, I checked the lines again. The image is not tilted and I don't think I needs any horizontal perspective correction, so we are talking here about a vertical perspective correction. The window on the top right is leaning a bit out, I could reduce the perspective correction from 21 to e.g. 18 degrees, but then those golde ornate patterns will need more correction in the other direction, since to get those straight I'd need something like 26 degrees, if I go further the columns at the borders look overcorrected. So, I could go up to 26 but then the window at the top will lean more outwards. I indeed think that the age of the buildings does play a role here (look for example at the tiles behind the altar, they are all but horizontal, specially on the right). Unfortunately I haven't found any usable other images on Commons or on the Internet to compare with and I can surely get everything straight but only with local adjustments what I never do for a "standard" perspective correction. Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you upload-and-revert a version with no vertical perspective correction and no perspective rotation or any other such changes. I could have a play with it to see what can be done. I agree, it is possible the building is just wonky. Perhaps best to ensure the camera is absolutely level to begin with. -- Colin (talk) 08:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Here you are, Colin Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I uploaded a version I think is better, and reverted. I didn't apply any rotation or vertical perspective. I just used the guided transform. I applied two vertical guides and one horizontal. You can see the guides on the second image I uploaded. The left guide clearly goes through the centre of the symmetrical pattern, which also happens to be a tile edge. On the right side, there is a symmetrical pattern at the top and bottom, which also follows a tile edge, though that's harder to see. The horizontal is the bottom row of the central tiles. Fixing those tiles also fixed the tiles further away. What was reassuring about this is that if you draw a line down the X's at the very centre of the back wall (from the top of the arch behind the cross down to the lower rectangle of tiles near the ground) it goes through them all perfectly. That tells me that adjusting those two side walls and the horizontal also corrected the rotation at the very centre of the church. The red door on the right is better. The window on the right is likely not true in real life. -- Colin (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the new version. I didn't have today the chance to compare your version with a version with a tilt + a perspective correction of something like 30, I assume that the different will not be much. In your version, apart from the issue with the window I also think that the colums at both sides ar leaning out, it doesn't look aesthetic to me and I don't think that the colums are tilted for real. I will look and compare the versions tomorrow, latest on Saturday. Thank you! --Poco a poco (talk) 22:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Colin: I've played around with different settings, also the guided transformation in Lr and would like to keep your version, assuming though that both the window top right and the columns are not straight but slightly leaning out. As the nom is through I see no point in pinging everybody but as the changes are slight IMHO I think that choosing that version would be ok. Poco a poco (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad we found a way to improve those sloping walls. Does you camera have a level in the viewfinder? If it were me, I'd ping the others out of courtesy and per COM:OVERWRITE. Your own hesitancy over the change shows to me that it isn't an obvious improvement but balances competing issues that some might object to. Btw, I didn't pay a lot of attention when exporting my version, so it might not have the EXIF you normally set for your own work. -- Colin (talk) 09:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Colin: Sure, I've a level and I usually use it. When I got into the church I was alone (I was really lucky) but right behind me there were more people coming in and doing the temperature test in the moment I took the picture. Long story short, I had to hurry up...--Poco a poco (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cmao20, Radomianin, Famberhorst, IamMM, and Alvesgaspar: @Aristeas, Agnes Monkelbaan, Llez, and Daniel Case: I'm pinging you to let you know that following the discussion during the nom I finally took over Colin's version prioritizing the verticality of the tiles/door versus window on top left and columns. If any of you disagrees with this version I'll revert to the version that was active during the nom. Thank you. --Poco a poco (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for pinging, @Poco a poco: Regarding me, I agree with the new version. Many regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support per Cmao20. (If you can come up with an even better perspective correction, that is always welcome, of course ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --IamMM (talk) 11:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Very good picture of a unique monument. Not easy to have those Solomonic columns in the foreground also on focus, I suppose. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 21:25:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: resolution is less than 2 megapixels. --Ivar (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 10:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2021 at 21:44:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Beş Qoş from Çufut Qale
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2021 at 17:24:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bridges Italy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 06:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of karst area
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 06:25:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 06:00:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 11:27:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faramarz Khan Caravanserai
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 05:32:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Closed seed boxes of a Iris sibirica
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Iridaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 11:19:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Khosrogerd Minaret
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 07:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Smooth dachshund
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 11:09:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Architect's design for the Earth 300 research vessel
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 07:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Head of female mosquito, eyes visible
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 23:16:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

House sparrows in the sun on a thorny branch
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 19:47:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 19:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 19:06:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White Dimorphotheca ecklonis, Cape Margarite
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 02:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 13:38:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Indonesia
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 19:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Zygaenidae_(Burnet_Moths)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 21:25:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seated Buddha from the site of Hadda, Gandhara, late Kushan period (around 300 CE)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 05:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 18:16:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2021 at 17:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Portugal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2021 at 03:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fraser valley viewed from Sumas Mountain
  •  Comment Thanks. The sky is better, though there are still darker dots in it, but I don't think the rest of it is FP-level with the remaining artifacts, and I consider panoramas to be fairly judged by looking at full size at this kind of scale. I'm afraid I'll have to oppose unless there's a way to redevelop the photo and get rid of the rough-looking artifacts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 08:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2021 at 12:20:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2021 at 17:24:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Príncipe malachite kingfisher (Corythornis cristatus nais)
  • Interesting. I won't be able to test mine yet, as the camera body will only arrive in a couple of weeks. Are you happy with the image quality? It looks like the colors and the contrast are excellent. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very happy with everything else. Noise at higher ISOs so much better than my EOS 80D. Eye-tracking of birds in flight works well against a clear sky. I've got the RF 100-500 lens though it can accommodate EF lenses. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2021 at 12:43:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 11:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Divje Babe flute, probably oldest known musical instrument
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2021 at 12:41:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

São Tomé malachite kingfisher (Corythornis cristatus thomensis)
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2021 at 09:04:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skyline of Tel Aviv
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2021 at 17:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Langenburg Castle
Confirmed results:
Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2021 at 17:19:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Comment The dust spot in the sky left to the water fall should be removed. --Cayambe (talk) 11:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 03:06:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A male northern pintail (Anas acuta) in flight at the Llano Seco Unit of the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex in the Central Valley of California
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Anas

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 11:24:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree silhouettes on the Uetliberg (Zurich) with November fog and sunrays
Confirmed results:
Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Zürich

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 11:24:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eleanor of Toledo with her son Giovanni de' Medici by Agnolo Bronzino.jpg
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 05:26:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gryphaea arcuata, Devil's Toenail; height 4.5 cm; Black Jurassic α III; nearEngstlatt, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Gryphaeidae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 08:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Smooth brittle-star (Ophioderma longicauda), Arrábida National Park, Portugal.
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Ophiuroidea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 16:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rocks and cliff at Cape Sounion, Greece.
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 16:19:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wandelgang
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2021 at 07:21:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Auberge de Castille, Valletta, Malta Island, Malta
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 10:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2021 at 07:58:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 33 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2021 at 05:39:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Clavariaceae (Coral Fungus)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 21:12:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gold coin with figure of an archer (obverse), and with figure of the Indian goddess of good fortune, Shri, seated on a lotus (reverse)
  • I assumed that the coins were the same size, in which case they should be shown as such. If not, they should at least be aligned in the image. Concerning the grey background, maybe it should be made uniform across the two parts and the stitching line be somehow eliminated. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Unifying the aligment is a good idea, if possible. Removing the stitching line seems a nice idea, too, but IMHO it would give the impression that these are two different coins lying side by side. Therefore, if this image shows both sides of one and the same coin, I would not remove the line. --Aristeas (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Money & Seals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2021 at 21:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tail fin of an American Airlines Dreamliner
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2021 at 03:00:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

I see. Should I create a new nomination, or just second the removal of the other pics? --·×ald·es 03:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@XalD: To avoid any confusion, it would the the savest solution to cancel this nomination and to create a new one. --Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2021 at 17:23:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2021 at 22:49:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 09:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2021 at 06:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common hepatica
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Ranunculaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2021 at 20:05:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Michelangelo's David - right view 2.jpg

* Support--The original David exhibited at the Accademia Gallery. I can't not support it. Stupendous. Thank you. 151.61.36.45 16:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87151.61.36.45 16:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PROPOLI87 but you have to log in First,no voting from IP adresses. Thank you.--Commonists 16:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2021 at 20:02:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Romaine Lacaux, by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Cleveland Museum of Art
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
  •  Info created by Pierre-Auguste Renoir / Cleveland Museum of Art, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info This painting may be Renoir's earliest signed canvas. Its sensitive display of color and light communicates an ideal of delicate, youthful beauty. The luminous tones of the background drapery and of the child's white blouse result from the artist's careful observation of reflected light and color on translucent materials. The delicate nuances of color, particularly in the young girl's face, reveal Renoir's previous training as a decorator of porcelain. He painted this portrait, commissioned by the vacationing Lacaux family, during his stay at an artist's colony in the village of Barbizon, near Paris.
  •  Support Very high resolution (159 Mpx) and quality. Beautiful painting from a famous painter. -- Yann (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Commonists 20:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2021 at 15:32:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Internal view of the Santuario di Santa Maria delle Grazie church in Brescia
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2021 at 05:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Erfurt Cathedral Square with St. Marien Cathedral (left) and Severikirche (right) by night
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2021 at 11:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dimorphotecaeclonis in Tandil, Argentina
I try to use rule of thirds here, I don't understand when apply it Ezarateesteban 12:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps you can crop it a bit, to i) reduce the amount of background; and ii) get rid of that partially in focus leaf on the right. I've added a possible crop as an image note. Regarding the Rule of Thirds, I would merely take it as a cue to experiment with different compositions, rather than a prescription with strict proportions. -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Ezarateesteban 11:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

  • Ezarate, personally I would crop it slightly more at the top (so that the flower is at an equal distance from the left and top borders), and less at the bottom (so there's a more balanced proportion of background to the right and to the bottom of the flower). -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See now, Julesvernex2 Ezarateesteban 17:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination thanks to all Ezarateesteban 11:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 14:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2021 at 15:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

church tower

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2021 at 09:29:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

female Euchomenella heteroptera
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2021 at 20:43:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A girl washes her hands during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Standing_people

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2021 at 22:10:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Príncipe sunbird (Anabathmis hartlaubii) male
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds and Spiderhunters)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 11:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drei Mädchen mit gelben Strohhüten I by August Macke
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Groups

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 10:07:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dunnock on a fence post
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Order_:_Passeriformes_(Passerines)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 06:12:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White-naped honeyeater
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 18:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bonnet Macaque Eating Banana
  •  Comment Thanks for adding the categories. Charles has some good points in his critiques of the photograph (without considering the practice of feeding monkeys; the other stuff), so I'm doubtful about supporting the photo for FP, in the end. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I have never been convinced that humans feeding animals like this is a sound conservation practice, especially for a vulnerable species. It happens all over India with various macaque and langur species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, I should have specified that it is the composition, the behaviour and the technical quality that I oppose. Feeding wild animals is often against the law. This animal has been fed for some time, judging by the full cheek pouches. I prefer wildlife images to show natural rather than man-made settings. The cut-off green plant is distracting. The lighting is sub-optimal and could you have chosen a better day for these easy-to-take animals? - that would have given you higher shutter speed, lower ISO and higher F number. The eyes are in focus, but little else. The settings chosen have resulted in softness and lack of definition. Some of the banana is blown. The sky background is not ideal, a darker background can often be better. There is a strange imbalance between the trees on the right and left. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 16:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water reflections in Glencoe Lochan, Scotland
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United_Kingdom#Scotland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2021 at 14:42:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2021 at 18:12:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La Défense, business district of Paris
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 16:45:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a delightful and harmonious scene, walking on the banks of the Arno river, in the colors of autumn (for me)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 20:21:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 20:27:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White seabream (Diplodus sargus), Arrábida National Park, Portugal
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Order_:_Perciformes_(Perch-like_Fishes)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2021 at 00:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2021 at 03:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bay-breasted warbler on a thorny branch
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2021 at 11:13:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lepsius Expedition
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1900

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2021 at 12:00:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tondo Doni 2021.jpg
Done, but you could have written to me in private. Greetings.--Commonists 15:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, I think we have a misunderstanding here: The "source" section of the file description says it's taken from the Google Art Project, so I thought we had a potential copyright problem with the 3D frame (that's why I brought it up here). But it's really your own photo, right? Then there's no problem at all, but you'll probably want to replace the line |source = {{From Google Cultural Institute|mwEx1TY1xbJCwg}} with |source = {{own}}. Otherwise Google will get all the credit for you photo ;-) Sorry for the mixup, please feel free to remove or collapse this whole conversation afterwards. --El Grafo (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done thanks--Commonists 17:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2021 at 13:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elbaite with albite
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 09:15:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

House sparrow (f) Passer domesticus with leaves, perched on roof. Ooty, India.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2021 at 22:46:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

One Hundred Horses, ink and colors on silk by Giuseppe Castiglione (1728)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2021 at 21:02:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2021 at 23:31:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2021 at 00:20:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The American heavy metal band Soulfly at the With Full Force Summer Open Air 2018 in Ferropolis, Germany.
  • Macro photography in the field is not a controlled environment although I know that we see many 'studio' macro images at FP. But why should a concert photographer not be able to do better? The framing especially is strange. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp, the field is controlled in the sense that you can choose to visit when there is a huge powerful lightsource up in the sky, unlike this concert which is inconveniently set towards sunset. Or you can stick some flashes on your camera and go close to the subject, unlike this concert where the subject is inconveniently 27 feet away from the camera, and flash isn't allowed. And you can wait for your subject to alight on a leaf and rest, unlike this concert where the subject has inconveniently decided to sing, play a musical instrument and move his whole body in time with a nearby drum beat. The exposure details (1/250 sec, f/3.5, ISO 2000) indicate no room to lower the ISO without impacting sharpness. Event photographers don't choose high ISO because they think digital noise is appealing, they choose it because they have to, and their customers aren't pixel peeping an 18MP image. Unlike, as usual, Commons FP. -- Colin (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians and singers performing

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2021 at 08:14:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle of Kaysersberg, Haut-Rhin , France
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2021 at 05:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:56, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Hydnangiaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2021 at 08:41:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kasbah Mosque, Marrakesh
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2021 at 06:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Illuminated window of the Observantenkirche in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Windows

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2021 at 12:31:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Príncipe sunbird (Anabathmis hartlaubii) female
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:56, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds and Spiderhunters)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2021 at 17:17:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cliffs of Étretat: Aiguille and Porte d´Aval
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Normandy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2021 at 17:36:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The river Neckar in Tübingen, Germany, in autumn
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2021 at 16:55:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chemical transport tank truck

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 04:05:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four-masted barquentine
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:45, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Sailing ships

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2021 at 22:45:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Violet Dimorphoteca eclonis
Just I withdraw previous nomination, what's wrong with this version? @Charlesjsharp: Ezarateesteban 11:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What crop do you propose @Charlesjsharp:  ? Ezarateesteban 12:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Square. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See now @Charlesjsharp: Ezarateesteban
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC) updated score -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
New vote total: 6-4, not featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 11:09:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dik-dik (Madoqua) free inside Okutala Etosha Lodge, Namibia, Africa
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Low quality, poor composition. Yann (talk) 09:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 10:34:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Opole Village Museum, Opole (Oppeln), Silesia. Wooden house from Radłów
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 11:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Príncipe golden weaver (Ploceus princeps) female
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Ploceidae_(Weavers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2021 at 08:31:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Ptuj Castle from the banks of the Drava, Styria, Slovenia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 11:39:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 22:43, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#Asia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 13:09:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common kingfisher doing an intimidation display
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 22:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Alcedinidae_(Kingfishers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2021 at 16:12:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A common tern trying to land on a branch
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 22:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Sterna

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2021 at 14:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sand grains of yellow building sand
  • Yellow building sand is a generic term for manufactured sand. You will notice that many of the sand grains are the same material. The edges of the grains are all rounded due to the manufacturing process. Nothing like sand from a beach, and hence, I feel this image has minimal EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would be interesting to have a similar image of natural sand, including for comparaison. But this image has high educational value in itself, to show form and colors of manufactured sand grains at the microscopic level. Yann (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 22:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks and minerals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2021 at 10:22:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Brown booby (Sula leucogaster) on Principe

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 21:31:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St Paul's Cathedral, Mdina, Malta Island, Malta
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Malta

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2021 at 00:54:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Snowfall from storm Filomena over the Iberian Peninsula.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#Europe

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2021 at 21:31:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Green wrasse (Labrus viridis), Arrábida National Park, Portugal
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Labridae_(Wrasses)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2021 at 07:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Altschlossfelsen near Eppenbrunn, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2021 at 13:57:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NASA KSC Shuttle Discovery during the operations for the test of the External Tank on 14 April 2005 before the Flight mission, STS-114
 Comment This is not my image, and I would not support it here --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2021 at 17:09:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

T-Centralen, Stockholms central underground metro station.
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2021 at 03:08:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus bairdi) holding a nut in its beak
Confirmed results:
Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Picidae_(Woodpeckers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2021 at 21:47:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A photograph of Jupiter with a long, brown oval known as a "brown barge", taken on 6 September 2018
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2021 at 12:42:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual snow sports

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2021 at 08:17:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Bled Castle in Bled, Upper Carniola, Slovenia
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2021 at 08:45:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Surreal representation of game pieces
  •  Oppose Appreciate the imagination and effort taken to make this image but am troubled by the vignetting and the magenta-green and yellow-blue tints in a neutral gray background. This suggests that the background may be underexposed (needs more fill light from the bottom and back) even as the subject is correctly exposed from the front light. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the background isn't really neutral (!) gray (craft cardboard). There are always touches of different colors. And the vignetting is the result of a special light: a flashlight (pocket light? - I don't know the English word.). IMO it's important to have the game pieces correctly exposed. A studio light would make a uncomfortable light. --XRay 💬 10:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Toys

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2021 at 10:42:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]