Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2017 at 01:05:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Since it appears that George uploaded the picture himself, the CC-By-SA notice already counts as "express permission" for everyone so it looks fine to me. He still holds copyright after all. dllu (t,c) 17:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 18:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 00:22:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment @Tomascastelazo what might be black-white for some for other can be white-black, so get your position. For me this should would be hard-for my mind. I suppose person would not like to be photographed, even if person affirmed shoting. Photographers bacame more predators, thats why i am affraid to go to shot my kindergarten. Too often we dont think on person which we shot at and how hard can it be. @Peulle: you gave us comparasion with migrating mother, for me more portrait shot (not begging). This citations tell all: "...the family wasn’t happy about the Migrant Mother photograph: “We were ashamed of it. We didn’t want no one to know who we were.” and "When the picture was taken, she claimed that Lange assured her the picture would never be published. She also said that Lange promised to send her a copy and she never did." Even more, they pumped up that story like CNN and FOX News does. One photographer said “To photograph it is to put on the same line of sight the head, the eye and the heart.” You gave one comparison, but i think this is more comparable. Hunting for the prize left many dead, not just for Pulitzer, even for "Like" on social media. You know...Mikey LIKES it! --Mile (talk) 14:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Mile: I recommend reading the rest of the article too; as you can see, the ending goes: "Florence Owens Thompson suffered a stroke in August of 1983. Her family couldn’t afford the medical treatment, so they took advantage of their mother’s status as the Migrant Mother. They raised over $25,000 (about $58,000 today) for her medical care through donations from the American public. That experience changed the family’s opinion of the photograph as they realized how many people their mother’s picture touched.".--Peulle (talk) 18:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I think that as photographers we should document what is happening all around us in our society, not just pretty buildings, preferably as respectfully as possible. Looking back at history, we will always need photographs, however horrible, since they will make us understand things better than any text can do. Even so, photographers have often been used as scapegoats for people's frustration and anger over a situation they feel they can't handle. I spoke with some ambulance personnel not long ago. They told me that when they arrive at an accident, people are hurt, afraid, irrational and they need someone to lash out at. Since there are no others at the scene of the accident, they direct their anger and frustration at the police and ambulance personnel. So the ambulance guys are always grateful when the photographers arrive, since people turn on them instead and let the ambulance crew work in peace. There are many more strong, famous photos where people have blamed the photographer who documented it, instead of those responsible for the situation in the photo. It is a modern version of "shooting the messenger". --cart-Talk 17:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Well, I can say many things about this image, but my main argument is that of documenting a social reality, even though the issue may not be pretty. In this particular image, it is pretty sterile, for it really lacks the drama that the subject matter can elicit. I tried to illustrate the phenomena in a very clean, abstract manner. These beggars #REDIRECT [[1]], in my opinion, are doing a job, for they do it in a very systematic way. I try not to judge them on the personal level, but it also seems to me that they choose to do this over other activities that could earn them money. Why do I say that? Well, I´ve seen them in many places, and I can see when they beg out of necessity and when they beg as a job. There is a huge difference. But regardless of the motivation or conditions, begging is begging, and beggars use public spaces to do their thing, and as such, they are fair game photographically for documenting purposes, for they are the expression of a social condition that needs management, and photography is a tool to do just that. As an observer of social phenomena and as a photographer I document this with a cold mind and cold heart, not judging, just showing what is. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose With the hidden face this does not really affect me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Categories fixed. As for the objection by Mile, I don't understand why this image should show a lack of dignity or decency seeing as the face does not show. Furthermore, the subject should not be avoided for sensitivity's sake: poverty is a huge problem that seems only to grow, and Commons' role is to document such facts. Photographers must strive to find the balance between documenting people's desperate situations while not serving to actively ridicule them. If you would like to read about a more famous example, I recommend this article about the iconic image Migrant Mother.
For me personally, however, this specific image is not particularly moving. The distance to the subject is too close not to show the personal features, IMO; it's an image that I think should show the facial features of the person in question. I  Oppose for this reason.--Peulle (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Bad idea. Now the image is over-categorized. Read more here.--Peulle (talk) 18:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 18:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2017 at 05:13:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BMW Mini on a country lane in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 18:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2017 at 06:26:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bodental with Karawanks behind, Ferlach, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 18:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2017 at 08:35:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oldest stained glass window in situ (ca. 1050-1120) in Le Mans Cathedral (France), depicting the Virgin and apostles during the Ascension of the Christ.
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 18:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 01:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pharmacie in Paulista Avenue
  •  Comment It would certainly be funny to see camera lens reviewers set up tripods in the pharmacy aisle. However it won't be a great test for lens sharpness since you can't test at infinity distance and it's hard to evaluate chromatic aberration correction with fluorescent lights that have a highly uneven spectrum. dllu (t,c) 17:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your review @Colin: . I requested permission to use a tripod, however this was not accepted. This was a small and very busy pharmacy. I take 42 photographs with my technique of shooting without breathing. It was the main shelf and there were a lot of people so I had to stay there until people got out of the way. This type of ridiculously monotonous simple and excessively ordered photos is the classic example of my favorite FP style. I think that in many users here we are compulsively ordered and we focus on collecting things to fill our social gaps, this kind of apparently harmless but exaggerated order. --The Photographer 23:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I don't think a tripod was needed here. According to the EXIF, you shot at 1/250s at 35mm (equivalent to 50mm on full frame). So two stops down would be f/3.5 which you could have hand-held (especially if taking several shots to be sure) at 1/60s. I like your ordered photos, and it is not easy to get such a scene exactly straight hand-held. I'm finding the new "guided adjustment" tool in Lightroom to be very helpful and faster than manually moving the sliders and judging by eye. Btw, dllu, most test charts don't test anywhere near infinity, which is a problem for all but a portrait lens. The folk at Lens Rentals test at infinity, and always wide open, which I think is a bit daft -- it over emphasises the problems between lenses (which is why they do it in their repair shop) but doesn't really tell you how the lens performs at normal apertures, and testing a macro lens at infinity is just silly. There's no perfect system, but a retail test chart could be more fun! -- Colin (talk) 08:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 18:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 19:08:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White-masked whisp
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2017 at 23:31:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment Ikan Kekek, the photograph was taken in a stand that is part of the Alfeñique fair, sugar made figures (and other materials), day of the dead related traditions in Mexico. The fair, or street stands, set up every year. Taken in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Well, I think that Coca Cola thinks it is ok to produce and promote a product that has caused a huge health crisis in the world. There is large evidence of that and the problem has been studied and published widely, this being just one example of many #REDIRECT[[2]]. This is all done of course in the name of free enterprise and corporate profits. This is a proven public health problem, and I wonder why governments are not as action prone as they are with other drugs that science has shown to be relatively harmless. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2017 at 04:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hommage a Picasso de Antonio Tàpies
??? The next image will become better. --XRay talk 14:12, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 15:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mosque Church in Pécs.jpg
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2017 at 15:59:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ugandan defassa waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus defassa) juvenile male
warts I think. The eyes are positioned as per rule of thirds. Charles (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When I was a child, I used to spend my free time removing the ticks of goats, dogs, and various animals that were in the yard of my house. Some ticks that were too big or too attached to the skin exploded and it was common for the animal to end up bathed in blood. The surface of the tick has a particular greyish gray color, and they can remain alive for a long time hidden until a new animal comes close. Some ticks grow like clusters of fruit in numbers of hundreds impossible to kill. In this case I would have sworn that they were ticks because of their appearance, thanks for the clarification. --The Photographer 18:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2017 at 20:30:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four-spotted chaser - Libellula quadrimaculata, male.
 Info New version. It was a bit dark indeed. I'm careful with strong brightness in photos because mostly it attends lost details. --Hockei (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2017 at 01:45:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 11:57:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eggs and freshly hadged beetles, perhaps potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2017 at 05:07:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 11:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The blossom of garden leek. Allium ampeloprasum var. porrum
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 18:59:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pashkov house, Moscow, Russia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 14:16:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2017 at 13:39:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Graue Fleischfliege Sarcophaga carnaria bei der Paarung
We have featured some hardcore insect pr0n of this same species; I suppose something more softcore would work, too (insect er0tica?). Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Support I like this hidden view very much. --Paul de Bolger (talk)]]) 23:03, 1 November 2017

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your third edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 09:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Diptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2017 at 11:20:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainbow sun dog in dark sky
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 12:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lime pit in the village of Brezovo, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 12:23:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peakock during Twilight near Kerandi River, Koraput
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2017 at 12:40:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 14:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2017 at 12:38:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vittoria Randonneur tire (trekking bicycle)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 14:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2017 at 16:51:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wallfahrtskirche St. Veit auf dem Ansberg bei Ebensfeld in Oberfranken
  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 32nd edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --Laitche (talk) 14:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 08:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2017 at 21:03:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bird room in the natural history museum in Bamberg
I'm not sure what to call it; the birds don't look real. There's definitely something off about this; the detail is washed out.--Peulle (talk) 16:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • So you guys not only support the photo but also think it's illegitimate to compare this to the supremely detailed, fantastic interiors that we've advanced to FP and find it not outstanding enough for FP on that basis? And even though it looks like this photo is set to be voted in as an FP with only a couple of opposing votes, that's terrible? Of course the composition is good and the picture is a very good effort; these things are not in question. But I think it's legitimate for me to find the lack of clarity in the details, especially in the foreground, disappointing, relative to existing FPs of interiors that are truly magnificent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course there are always better pictures. We can't expect every interior to be stitched. There are few contributors who are able to create Diliff-style pictures, most of our fellow contributors here are not able to. We shouldn't compare every interior with those of Diliff or others. This picture here is still among our finest. --Code (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ikan, my vote is based off the fact that I find the image beautiful. The quality could be better but this image still looks nice at fullscreen on my 2K monitor, so I am not bothered too much by the pixel-level issues - though they do come into my consideration -- Thennicke (talk) 03:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 08:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2017 at 10:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Royal pavilion in Phraya Nakhon Cave in Khao Sam Roi Yot National Park

* Support Wonderful --Aczap (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 29th edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 13:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 13:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Thailand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2017 at 05:12:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /[--cart-Talk 18:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Airliners

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2017 at 04:56:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset in Akrotiri, Santorin, Greece
  • Thanks for your good idea. I've seen the possible improvment some days agoo. But if I crop this image the way you proposed, the resolution would be too small. I should visit Santorini again ... --XRay talk 08:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You should if you can. I've been enjoying a lot of your photos from there. I haven't decided which of the pictures of bells with long shadows is the best, but one of those might be an FP. They remind me somewhat of De Chirico. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2017 at 17:21:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • I understand, it's hard to find a pond exactly where you would get a nice reflection, such as a centered single tree, a bench, a telephone pole, a single cloud or something like that for a wow-factor. We should both keep looking. --cart-Talk 16:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2017 at 21:58:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2017 at 05:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset in Akrotiri, Santorin, Greece
 I withdraw my nomination I'll try a decision. Thanks for your reviews. --XRay talk 16:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /XRay talk 19:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 18:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Picture of Adzuki Beans (Vigna angularis).
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 07:14:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Charnel house at the cemetery in Pisweg, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 21:11:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rooftop Old Billingsgate Market
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2017 at 09:05:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Märchenwiese (Romance Meadow) in Bodental, municipality Ferlach, Carinthia, Austria, EU
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 01:05:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

* Support --Aczap (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 28th edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 13:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 09:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2017 at 19:22:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four bells in Ia, Santorini, Greece
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /XRay talk 08:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 09:03:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Märchenwiese (Romance Meadow), Bodental valley, municipality Ferlach, Carinthia, Austria, EU
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 22:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 12:06:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Knapweed fritillary butterfly (Melitaea phoebe) in Bulgaria
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 22:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 11:26:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 22:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 23:28:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BTS in Stara Morawa
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 23:33:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kletno I quarry in Kletno
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2017 at 21:34:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House Collector's Office ceiling
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 22:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Highly magnified image of a Fruit Fly (Drosophila melanogaster) Pupa (Size 2.5 mm).
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2017 at 12:27:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Basil's Cathedral, Red Square in Moscow, Russia
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 16:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 23:46:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2017 at 06:21:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 16:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Netherlands

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2017 at 02:08:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @Thennicke and Selbymay: Sorry if I didn't explain, but there are many problems which should not be present in an FP nomination. There is no definition: A 600mm lens is completely inappropriate for a shot of flower. There is poor DoF: F5.6 is inappropriate for a shot of flower. Processing: there appears to be extensive poor quality processing on the flower head. I also don't find the composition attractive - the balance is wrong for me and the cut-off stem is unattractive, but that isn't my reason for opposing. Charles (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment For me, the focus is off. Both flowers appear to be out of focus, the right one definitely so. As such, I feel it fails on technical quality.--Peulle (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay. Well I deliberately went for 600mm f/5.6 so as to maximise the separation of the plant from the background. Perhaps I should've done a focus stacking shot and these sharpness issues wouldn't be there. -- Thennicke (talk) 04:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 15:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 13:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Göltzschtal railway Bridge
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2017 at 14:21:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seeds with husk (left) and with husk removed (right).
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 08:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2017 at 21:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Shard at sunset
Cart, thanks for the comments. The nasty pointy thing is sometimes called "Shard London Bridge", sits above London Bridge station, and the collection of buildings in this area is called the London Bridge Quarter. So I wanted, for better or worse, to include London Bridge in the photo. You can just about make out the words "LONDON BRIDGE" on the pillar of the bridge in the shadows. I agree the sky above that area doesn't have the clouds and the sun is setting off to the right so that part of the sky is brighter. I thought it was quite nice to get the contrast of Southwark Cathedral with the geometric glass buildings. The bridge does form a leading line, though the picture would have to be an awful lot wider to get all of that bridge in since it crosses over close to my right side. I'd need closer to a 180° angle of view to follow it to the end. I tried the crop you suggested. It's a different photo that's not bad provided the Shard is off-centre a bit. Perhaps I will return and do a higher-resolution photo of that scene, to capture all the windows and little people. -- Colin (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 08:37, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United Kingdom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2017 at 10:10:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Friday Prayer at Baitul Mukarram Mosque, Dhaka
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 03:23:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Actually, this one is valid. User has just cleared the limit for days and edits so strike removed. Please don't assume trolling just because a user is new and don't know all the rules here. --cart-Talk 10:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 30 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 14:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 22:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Québec city downtown.jpg
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 14:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2017 at 14:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parabuteo unicinctus
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2017 at 07:55:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Asclepeion Epidaurus.
 Comment Nah, cropping would just make the image look out of balance, I think. It's gotta be good enough as is, or not. Thanks for reviewing.--Peulle (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll give it a try. Stand by... --Peulle (talk) 14:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done What do we think?--Peulle (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2017 at 19:26:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cinca River trail at Bielsa, Sobrarbe, Huesca, Aragon, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 23:56:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monasterio de São Bento, São Paulo, Brazil
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 22:01:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Train in the Hablehrood river canyon
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Iran

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2017 at 13:05:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Our Lady of the Saints Theodore church in Fira, Santorini, Greece

* Support --Aczap (talk) 13:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 27th edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 13:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2017 at 20:25:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The western facade of Schloss Augustusburg
 Support--Peulle (talk) 14:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ultra wide angle :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2017 at 07:59:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spikovo Waterfall on River Bregalnica at Ravna Reka, Macedonia
There's no way to dial back the highlights only in that one area of the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan: I guess that Petrovskyz refers to the moment he captured the scene, a HDR could have helped here with such a wide dynamic range. Poco2 21:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I'd like to bring up and additional problem: in this kind of images I do consider important that water flows vertical, due to the lack of perspective distortion the water flows are tilted (both sides are leaning in), that's pretty disturbing. Poco2 21:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 08:41:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Imperial Cathedral of Königslutter, built from 1135. Paintings in transept and apse
  • I don't think it's better; rather, I find the photo I nominated richer in the variety of frescos it presents. Sure, the other photo is more useful for an article about Christ Pantocrator, but that's not the only reason for featuring a photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Without mandatory reason for a special orientation for such stretched pictures I choose landscape as it allows the maximal use on the screen. In portrait mode you could see the full image only in a very small view (Just open the image in full view and press Ctrl-Alt-RightButton! Panic mode off: You can undo this by pressing Ctrl-Alt-UpButton ) --PtrQs (talk) 01:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 20:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 05:58:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 20:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 07:06:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parish church Saint Lambert and charnel house in Pisweg, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 20:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 18:34:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The main nave of the Cathedral of the Sacred Heart in Richmond, Virginia
  • I won't name names, but the judging of WLE and WLM is often disappointing, in my humble opinion. I wish that panels consisted of FPC reviewers, or at least had the sort of critical eyes that we cultivate here. I don't know about the circumstances of WLM-US when I say that, but the sentiment is general -- Thennicke (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Support --Aczap (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 25th edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 13:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 02:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#United_States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 16:07:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 02:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2017 at 15:46:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wayside cross at the alpine pasture Göriacher Alm near Turnau, Styria, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 23:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2017 at 13:44:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

House museum of landscape painter N.N.Khokhryakov in Kirov, Russia
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 02:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2017 at 04:32:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fokker Dr.I (reg. D-EFTJ, cn 003, built in 1986)
 Comment It is a pity that the image is too bright. Otherwise it were very good and „wow“ for me. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 15:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2017 at 08:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four bells in Ia, Santorini, Greece
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 04:26:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Picture depicts heron, the long-legged freshwater and coastal bird in a Green field of Koraput district, Odisha, India. They are associated with water, they are essentially non-swimming waterbirds that feed on the margins of lakes, rivers, swamps, ponds and the sea.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2017 at 21:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Side part of a church pew, Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, South Tyrol
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2017 at 04:40:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dark purple Trichoglottis (Trichoglottis atropurpurea)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2017 at 18:10:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

State Historical Museum, Moscow, Russia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 02:51:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Colin, the more I look at it the more I agree with this critique actually. I'm going to withdraw this one and nominate another, because Jorge Royan's galleries have plenty of other similar images without such problems, which are probably more suitable to feature. -- Thennicke (talk) 00:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Yes, what Colin says is true, but still, I find it very original, a good composition (if possible I'd have captured more on the top, but whatever) overall and acceptable quality Poco2 19:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Sorry to the supporters, but I've changed my mind about this picture; I will nominate others from Jorge's 2005 India trip though -- Thennicke (talk) 00:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 12:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Church of St. Donatus, Zadar, Croatia

 I withdraw my nomination maybe you're right. Thanks --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 08:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rings of time Information Age (Digital Revolution)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
  •  Info Rings of time: Information Age (Digital Revolution). Nothing special would say, but it takes a lot of time and i am happy to finnaly made this. Especially when Information age didn't have any photo yet (main plan was to import this into Information Age article). Letters are huge because 1st is the intention to use it in printed media, so it must be seen in similar to A5 size. --Mile (talk) 08:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Mile (talk) 08:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Are you sure he first Information Age thing was a "massage"? :) On the other hand, that would explain a lot about the Internet today... --cart-Talk 10:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The 'w' in Walkman should be upper case. Also, I don't get why some things are in ALLCAPS and others aren't. PumpkinSky talk 12:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose An interesting idea but ultimately the image has a short shelf-life (i.e. next year) and the choice of events is somewhat arbitrary and inconsistent. For example, the Walkman and early mobile phones were not digital. The Mac, Intel and important chips are not included, yet Windows 10 is, which seems more of an evolution of a product than anything which changed history. Ultimately, any such list is going to be personal and controversial. I don't think the choice of font is very professional. -- Colin (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I count on that, not everyone will be satisfied what will be mentioned, was making list 2-3 days. What to put. It is as it is, spent too much on this. I am satisfied with it. Walkman, isnt digital, but goes under Info Age. Letters, etc... which letters would you take !? I dont like to official here. --Mile (talk) 21:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC) p.S. Luckily, i had date to start with first TCP/IP... otherwise, i wish huge tree, to put Magelan voyage, discovering of America, de Gama voyage...etc. Cart, its more idea. You get the tree, then count years, and then to make timeline. I know Info would be good.[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 06:50:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Emirates Airbus A380-861 at Munich Airport, departing 26L.
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Airliners

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2017 at 21:53:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grand Kremlin Palace, Moscow, Russia

* Support --Aczap (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 26th edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 13:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Poco_a_poco I found very useful the oppose comments (maybe some exceptions like "not wow", for example), however, comment a oppose vote is a requirement accepted for everyone who nominates pictures here. I really find the oppose votes comments more enriching than the positive ones because these comments help to improve the photographers quality and we are only able to improve thanks to constructive criticism. I particularly do not see anything wrong with the Mile comment and If you do not agree, ignore his comment but do not ask people to break the rules. --The Photographer 20:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 07:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chapel on the historic city cemetery in Göttingen, Germany.

Alternative Composition

[edit]

Chapel on the historic city cemetery in Göttingen, Germany.

  • Of course, I think that everyone should be careful to avoid that situation and oppose an otherwise featurable photo only if it's clear that the result would be only to help the other version win. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 17:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 14:20:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Holma Boat Club by the light of the moon.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 01:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 21:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Royal Naval College
The Photographer, I'll see if I can eliminate them tomorrow. Is it just the two cyclists? If I can't remove them, I think they are far enough apart to be not easy to spot except to us eagle-eyed reviewers. -- Colin (talk) 23:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Photographer, I have removed the repeated cyclists. Also managed to improve the Union Jack in the centre of the picture. -- Colin (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fix it, There are another severals pixels problem without a real importance. Btw, you are the only one eagle-eyed reviewer. --The Photographer 23:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 23:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 00:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Looks good to me. I don't notice a problem with people, but I'm sure it'll be dealt with. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support It would be much prettier if the building was in the sun, but this still passes the bar IMO -- Thennicke (talk) 03:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thennicke agree, however the buildings face north so are never in full sun. You end up with an image like this or this where a portion is in deep shadow. A photo taken from the hill like this would get the full sun from the other side. Btw, here are the buildings from the air -- it is a much more three-dimensional scene than it appears. -- Colin (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks for the context. I think I'd still prefer the early morning light with the diagonal shadows - the soft yellow glow is oh-so-pretty, and the asymmetrical lighting doesn't faze me. And with buildings such as these you always have the option of getting up early and doing what Julian did in this image, where the sun is rising from behind the building but the facades are still getting plenty of reflected light from the bright sky. I do think that this image has about the worst lighting possible for a building - no offence intended there at all - it is well processed though, and I judge on execution more than on subject/lighting, so still FP to me -- Thennicke (talk) 02:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Thennicke agree, and if this was an ordinary building at ordinary resolution, then just a QI -- there's nothing magical about the light here. At least it lights evenly for educational purpose, rather than having some of the building hidden in shadow. I do think that strong side light would probably provoke a lot of opposes with complaints that too much of the building was in shadow, unless one artificially pulled up the shadows strongly. The light in Julian's photo is very nice. -- Colin (talk) 08:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Sorry for elaborating on this point but another thought I had - you could also do such an image on an overcast day, such as in this image. Then you avoid this ugly dynamic range with the bright sky in the background and the dark stuff in the foreground, because everything is evenly-lit and uniform. I think we tend to forget that overcast days can actually produce really great architectural (and other) images, and that a white sky is not always a problem - sometimes that's the way it actually looks -- Thennicke (talk) 13:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Thennicke, no problem. It is good to think about how to improve picture-taking. Looking at our FP exterior architecture photos, of the many dozens of images, I can count the ones taken on overcast days on one hand. That's quite an exceptional example there, where the unusual geometric shape suits the soft lighting, and the exterior is not grey stone, but dark glossy surfaces that work well against a plain sky. Overcast sky is not unusual in the UK and can be really bright to the point of needing HDR to avoid it simply blowing to white, or really dark where one needs to artificially raise the exposure or else the image looks too dull to be enjoyable. You won't avoid "bright sky; dark foreground" unless the sky is actually not evenly lit. For example, dark rainclouds behind the subject and clear sun low behind the photographer always generates a dramatic image. People just don't tend to like white or light-grey skies, and I think if this was a plain grey sky, it would be opposed for it. Leaving the sky aside here, the actual subject is lit via clouds, as it would on an overcast day, so is softly lit, just nothing exciting. That has the benefit of not needing any careful exposure handling, lifted shadows or reduced highlights. This is "the way it actually looks", but that's not really an argument for generating the "wow" for FP vs the thousands of QIs taken on overcast days. Btw, "Capturing Light" by Michael Freeman is a great book on different sorts of light. -- Colin (talk) 14:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How general composition light rule the background need have a different contrast level than the foreground, however, I understand the Thennicke comment, the sky look  Overexposed , maybe you could fix it using lightroom. --The Photographer 18:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 01:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#United Kingdom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 10:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 01:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 13:38:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brunnenhaus in Bad Kissingen
  • The water in places like this room is for drinking, not swimming or bathing in. The blue representation of water in the lower area is probably just ornamental and not a pool. --cart-Talk 17:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 14:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 20:57:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Plectranthus verticillatus in a ceramic pot.
  • Like I said in the nomination: "It may not be to everyone's taste". I'm simply trying something we don't see very often here. If most voters find it appalling, it will be voted out and I won't try anything like it again. --cart-Talk 09:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charles, your comment comes across as sarcastic and aggressive. I'm sure it wasn't meant that way but perhaps the choice of words could be kinder/more constructive -- Thennicke (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Lamiaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2017 at 15:02:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The flowers in her hair by John George Brown
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 16:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stadium Galgenwaard at night
@Livioandronico2013: This is a football stadium at night during a football match. WikiZeven (talk) 22:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 15:23:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 00:23:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2017 at 09:30:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rain clouds over Epidavros
✓ Done Thanks for spotting the dust. :) And yes, this is definitely not just a photo of the ruins; the reason I felt it might deserve the FP badge is because of the light created by the sun behind those heavy clouds. Should I specify this in the image description too, or is it sufficient to say it in this nomination?--Peulle (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Information about the photo and the scene goes on the file's page. Information about the FPC nomination and arguments pro or con, goes only on the nomination page. I don't think someone using a Wikipedia or this image data bank will be interested in reading about why a photo should be featured. --cart-Talk 19:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose  Underexposed zones and composition --The Photographer 16:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild  Support - I don't feel strongly about this photo, but I think we should accept Peulle's statement that the clouds (and presumably the rest of the picture) is as dark as it actually was. I like the light, shadow and ruins in the picture. Colin might say that I'm being too influenced by this reminding me of good paintings with similar subject matter, and if he did say that, he might be right, so I'm hedging a little by only mildly supporting, though of course I'm aware that regardless of how strong or weak my vote is, it counts just as much (or as little). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Dark clouds and sunlight can be a good combination but overall this is a bit underwhelming. The actual monument is really not very much at all (see this angle). The scene reminds me a bit of File:Tourists posing at the National Monument of Scotland.jpg, and even that joke of a monument is more complete than this. The tourists, scrap metal poles and orange and blue distractions (car? junk?). Overall the image is really soft, so either there's a focus error and/or the use of f/16 on a crop sensor with that superzoom lens is just too much diffraction softening. Ikan, yes the problem about being reminded about better famous artwork, is it reminds me the famous artwork is better. While echoing a famous motif is fine, one's execution of it really has to stand alone, rather than relying on a memory of something else. -- Colin (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Your point of view is logical. I'll consider whether to change my vote to neutral. But in partial argument (though, again, I don't feel strongly about this), I don't think this has to be as good as the best of the "landscape with ruins" paintings to be a viable FP. It doesn't look like this will pass at FPC, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I only say it should "stand alone" as a great image, not that it is as good as or better than some classic artwork. I don't find a "reminds me of a great work" to be a convincing reason to support an image. -- Colin (talk) 08:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Something can remind you of a great work while being utter schlock. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: if that's your way of saying that this particular image is poor, I'd call that the best hidden insult ever. :D --Peulle (talk) 13:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's a general statement. If I thought this image was poor, I wouldn't have voted for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2017 at 23:37:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lights of Climbers staying over night in the wall of El Capitan

Alt 2

[edit]

  •  Support I think there are two aspects to this. One is a night photo of the mountain, with stars and strange dots of light on the cliff face. Another is a photo documenting the night camps of climbers on this mountain. I think the second aspect is what fascinates us and raises this above any photo of stars and mountains, and is educational rather than just pretty. And it is only really this photo that is (a) sharp of the mountain itself and (b) clear enough to see several climbers in their light spots. The trees reaching for the sky are good, though I accept the argument above that they may give an impression the mountain is smaller than it is. I also wonder why the colour is so different in this one compared to the other two, shot within a few minutes of each other. There's much more of a purple/blue tint in the others, which seems artificial to me and this one seems more neutrally coloured (see both rock and sky). -- Colin (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the Color: I am currently switching from Lightroom 6 to Capture One as Adobe killed the stand alone License and I am not willing to rent my photo database software (but that is a discussion we should not get into here). This picture was the first picture I developed, still using Lightroom while the other two have been developed in Capture One which seems to have a slightly warmer, more magenta white balance as a default. As I didn't have the intention to have the two pictures side by side I never compared the two during development. Hence: I can match the color balance if needed, but I am hesitated to blow up the number of alts even more... -C-M (talk) 11:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The first photo's EXIF seems to suggest it has been through both Lightroom and Capture One. Based on the colours, I'd say there's a problem with your Capture One setup. It really doesn't look natural to me. I see in Lightroom you use the "Adobe Standard" profile, which tends to be neutral if boring vs the "Camera standard" which emulates your camera brand's JPGs. I don't know if Capture One has an equivalent. Ideally I think you want your raw software to be neutral and any deviation from that to be a deliberate choice. -- Colin (talk) 15:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Colin, I imported the whole Lightroom database into Capture One which took over the exposure adjustment, crops as well as my keywords and ratings, hence Lightroom being mentioned as "History Software Agent" in the EXIF data. Capture One applied the Nikon D500 Profile which indeed has a different tone compared to the Adobe Standard. When I select "Adobe DNG File Neutral" I get a similar color to the one of Lightroom. --C-M (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose It may be sharper and all but frankly, I find all those trees blocking the veiw of the mountain a bit opressing, like you were looking up at all that glory from a pit down in a dark forest. --cart-Talk 09:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - As Colin says, this is the best of the 3, but I'm not sure I'm ready to support it. It's certainly sharper and has much more believable color, and the photographer has the artistic license not to use perspective correction on the trees but let them seem to converge. I would say it has wow, too; I'm just not sure how much I like it. I think I'd prefer a wider composition that's as sharp or sharper and doesn't have a purplish sky, but that's not an option in this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alt 3

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 08:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
W.carter, by my count, yes. File:Elcapitanclimbers.jpg has 72% support ratio (8 supports, 3 opposes) while Alt 3 (File:Yosemite night elcapitan climbers.jpg) has 78% ratio (7 supports, 2 opposes). MZaplotnik(talk) 13:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
MZaplotnik Ok, I see. Different way of counting and fine by me if no one objects. However, I see this a good example of why Alts should be avoided as much as possible. Thank you for closing. --cart-Talk 13:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2017 at 22:36:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cliche picture and viewpoint, but I think my light was better than most of the other pictures from tunnel view. Also, the clouds around El Capitan are quite nice, even so Half Dome is unfortunately not visible.

* Support excellent autumnal mood! I prefer the alt --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alt

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 08:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2017 at 16:27:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Czerwonogród Castle, Nyrkiv, Ukraine
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /WikiZeven (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 19:16:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Access to Garaio beach, Ullíbarri-Gamboa reservoir. Álava, Basque Country, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#GermanyPlaces#Spain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 19:17:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Access to Garaio beach, Ullíbarri-Gamboa reservoir. Álava, Basque Country, Spain
  • Yes, yesterday I was lucky with the weather. Almost raining and grey all day, and then the sun came out for about half an hour and I was in the right place at the right time. Good light and dramatic clouds. Both images have been taken from almost the same point, one towards the lake, the other towards the parking lots. Thank you! --Basotxerri (talk) 07:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm wondering what me made to shoot the image this way. I'm sure I tried to get down a bit but something seemed better in this composition. But indeed, this is an interesting subject for varying. Landscape, portrait, vanishing point in the centre or rule of thirds... --Basotxerri (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#GermanyPlaces#Spain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2017 at 04:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stow Lake, Golden Gate Park
 Comment @Livioandronico2013: If an image is not interesting for me I can not say that it is bad. Than my vote is neutral or I say nothing. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Neutral As much as I'd like to support, it's the white car in the middle that brakes the deal for me. Any chance to clone it out? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The car brakes the deal? Good one! Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Hah! The best unintentional pun I've made in quite a while! ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 00:16:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Question@W.carter: Didn't you nominate something like this yourself once? (Although I seem to remember it being smaller). Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case Yep, I did but mine was minimalistic and not as intriguing and charming as this one. --cart-Talk 08:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 07:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 03:41:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tallmons naturreservat, Sweden
 Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 06:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: and @W.carter: I'm sorry but No, I was thinking on a better rated IMDB movie, Evil Dead II --The Photographer 16:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 30 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Code (talk) 06:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2017 at 15:15:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Elijah Church in the village of Lubnica, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 20:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2017 at 10:00:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of the fresco of Saints Cyril and Methodius holding a scroll with the Cyrillic script in the Monastery of Saint Jovan Bigorski, Macedonia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  •  Info created by BrankaVV - uploaded by BrankaVV - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The image is well enough rendered (though there is some red/green CA in the top left on the black text). But the full image is this and for an artwork, I can't see a particular justification to support an arbitrary crop at FP. Fine for a QI, but surely our "finest" images of artworks would endeavour to be high-resolution copies of the whole work. -- Colin (talk) 11:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Colin Interesting, red/green CA is probably worse than man without head with spoiled focus. Otherwise good represantion of old slavic cyrilic letters. Because of that, maybe it could not pass QI, but definately worth of FP (representing of Slavic culture). In any case, pro photographer with 1.6 mill shots and top camera against hobby camerman with Canon EOS 60D. Crop might be beter, but putting of failed FP + and here - is wonderful. Suppose that president is more then this cultural heritage. --Mile (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Some CA is acceptable (imo, though not to others) in a great photo of a scene, and I'd also be more permissive in a ultra-wide shot as CA is harder to eliminate in such lens designs. But here we are reproducing an artwork and the bar for "finest" on Commons for artworks is really rather high. I have no idea why you are comparing to a snap photo of Obama, these are about as far away from each other, photographically, as it it is possible. To be honest, I think it should pass QI as it is certainly a useful photo and of good quality -- I think QI's obsession with pixel peeping is extremely harmful to the project. We have plenty FPs of frescos and other religious art that include most/all of a scene. I don't see why we should start featuring random crops, unless the cropped view is exceptionally notable or there is some physical reason why photographing the whole scene is very hard. -- Colin (talk) 14:51, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Mile, of course it's just a random and non-notable crop because it depicts something that affects hundreds of million people, while the fresco is older than some advanced civilisations today. As for the "man without had with spoiled focus", don't forget that he's a supranatural deity that everyone here must worship, otherwise risking to be either bullied or blocked indefinitely and reported to the Wikimedia Foundation Legal Team.:)--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Regretful oppose per Colin. Our goal with painting digitizations should be the whole work before we consider featuring a crop. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - I have to agree with the others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 20:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2017 at 05:14:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Raoni Metuktire, indigenous leader of the Caiapó ethnic group, participates in the 1st World Congress of Environmental Law, at the Court of Justice of the State of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) (Fernando Frazão / Agência Brasil)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 20:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2017 at 22:59:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Gardey train station
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 20:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2017 at 19:44:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dish with fruits
  •  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Very nice still life with fruit, and I find it perfectly natural for it to be on a table with a tablecloth. The decoration on the tablecloth is pleasant to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The crop is too tight, the pattern of the tablecloth is distracting (not to say ugly) and the dark top corners make the whole picture look unbalanced. I'd rather expect a featured still of fruits look like this [4], [5], [6]. --Code (talk) 07:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info Yesterday i made 2 crops, one wider and one 16:9 Maybe on 16:9 is a bit narrow crop, so i put more space now, also added some vibrance since first was original. So all voters check again. --Mile (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC) @Code i dont like that darkness, maybe they were impressed by Dutch painters.[reply]
  •  Oppose I'm sorry, but to me the whole thing looks sterile, stark and not appetizing at all. When I see fruits photograped something like this, I would like to be tempted to eat them. The polyester table cloth with distracting pattern doesn't help either. --cart-Talk 11:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per others. Food photography needs to be arranged with a view to eating and to draw one towards the subject. Also an odd choice of fruit, unless you guys eat lemons like you do oranges. -- Colin (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 20:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 11:48:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The southern facade of Schloss Augustusburg, Brühl, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 19:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2017 at 19:06:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /WikiZeven (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 20:23:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leaves of grass at Sunrise in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 22:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2017 at 13:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Temple dedicated to Khanderaya, also known as Khandoba, located in Jejuri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
  •  Info created and uploaded by PKharote - nominated by Selbymay (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC) - This picture won the first prize for WLM in India this year. It's rare to see this kind of monument with the crowd around during a celebration in this competition and it adds much in value - aesthetic as encyclopedic.[reply]
  •  Support Selbymay (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Strong support Time ago without see a amazing and spectacular image like this. Right moment, amazing point of view, composition, historic moment and situation, quality, charming and a long list of amazing for this image. Some things could be better, for example not having cut the structure similar to a Christmas tree in the lower right, also the arm of the person on the left, however, totally minuscule comments compared to the grandiosity of this spectacular photo and possibly image of the year --The Photographer 14:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose for now because of perspective issues - verticals should be vertical. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • As it's an awarded picture, I think we don't have to edit it, unless you want to upload an alternative version, even if I don't see the necessity. I put the proposition in the category Religious buildings but the main subject is not the temple but the celebration, it's more a news image than an architectural view. --Selbymay (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I disagree, Uoaei1. The purpose of this photo is not to be an architectural shot. The camera appears to be pointing slightly down, and so that is the perspective. -- Colin (talk) 17:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • What ever this is, the perspective issue disturbs me, otherwise I would not have opposed. The only result of my vote is probably that you have to wait a couple of days longer to receive the FP star. --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Uoaei1 by why you are "disturbed" enough to oppose? [though we all know why Livio opposes] There is an expectation in architectural photography that we present a perpendicular view in rectilinear projection and at sufficient distance to avoid exessive wide-angle distortion. But the purpose of the photography here is to give the observer's view of the event. We have people on a high position throwing turmeric on a crowd below. The obvious direction of view is to the crowd. You wouldn't, at this point, look straight ahead at the towers across, so neither should our perspective give that impression. The angle here is a good compromise between a direct look down and keeping level enough to retain the top of the spires. I simply think it is factually wrong to describe this as a "perspective issue". The perspective is correct and a valid one. If you don't like the view and angle, then fine that is merely a matter of taste, but let's not confuse that with any technical fault that isn't there. -- Colin (talk) 21:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Colin: When I see these leaning verticals, I feel disturbed - not more and not less. And I see that a correction would be easy. Do you want to discuss my personal impressions? Please be respectful and accept my vote. --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • I can be respectful if you express your opinion as a matter of taste/feeling. But a statement like "verticals should be vertical" or a complaint about "perspective issues" is simply factually and optically wrong. Furthermore, it gives a bad indication to photographers thinking of nominating at FPC that we have rather odd and limited ideas of what is valid (vs what is enjoyed or disliked), or to photographers trying to improve their photography, that someone this image has a fundamental technical flaw. -- Colin (talk) 08:04, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
            • @Colin: I refer to the image quality rules - so what is wrong or insufficient, or even simply factually and optically wrong? And before you explain me that this rule just applies to architecture photography, just have a look in what category this is nominated! --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
              • Uoaei1, as you already know, this rule only applies to architecture photography, and even then only for a certain style of architecture photography -- we have several examples that rightly deviate from the rule the camera must be pointing directly level or up. This sort of rigidity of thinking, that there is only one correct way, discourages creative photography. See Dreyfus model of skill acquisition for where "rules" sits in one's journey. The category is not, in fact, what the image has been nominated to be judged for, though it can be helpful if chosen well. If you remember, in the past, those who maintain our FP galleries used to decide where to put each photo, which isn't always easy as a photo can apply in several categories. It was then decided to pass that job onto the nominator. We've gone from the task being done by those familiar with the categories and their maintenance, to the task being done by novices. So we now very frequently find the nominator hasn't chosen well, and the nomination gets these sort of comments about this irrelevance. If you haven't spotted the crowd of hundreds of people, being showered by saffron in an act of religious worship, then you're looking at a different picture to me :-). -- Colin (talk) 10:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Spectacular scene. -- Colin (talk)
  •  Support Wow. That's what FP is for! --Yann (talk) 18:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Amazed also as a jury member of WLM India :) Poco2 18:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Wonderful! Top-down photos are always hard, if not impossible, to correct and here a slight tilt doesn't matter. My main concern is: How do you keep your camera clean with all that powder flying around! :) --cart-Talk 18:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose For Uoaei1,terrible terrible... --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Nice!!! --Sanjay Acharya (talk) 21:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- King of 02:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Great action shot, just an amazing image. I don't give a damn about verticals being parallel in this kind of image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support wonderfully NatGeo-ish! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question PKharote, one request: Presumably, the occasion is Holi. Could the fact that pigments are being thrown to celebrate Holi be added to the file description? I wonder, too, whether there's a category for Holi. If so, it should be added for this file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Tried to improve the description with links. Jee 04:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixing the perspective could result in a cut composition that IMHO is a generate another problem. --The Photographer 14:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 22:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events (Arts, concerts, shows...)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2017 at 02:41:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2017 at 18:03:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exterior of the Pula Arena, Pula, Croatia.
  • Poc Saw it before on name. Suppose lack of lights helped you here. Otherwise i checked whats with your Canon, DXO and users are saying worst red channel - my main oppose for your HDRs. --Mile (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Martin Falbisoner: Thanks! I knew this reminded of another image we had ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 22:02, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2017 at 20:02:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magnified image of coriander seeds.
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 22:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 19:33:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dhaka Ricksha Driver
  •  I withdraw my nomination
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 19:38:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young Muslim Woman Sylhet
  •  I withdraw my nomination
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 19:48:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Girl with Water Jug
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 15:11:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bell in Japanese Garden
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 13:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2017 at 12:45:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Berlin Cathedral, seen from Humboldt Box
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 13:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 20:00:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schloss Gondorf, der Oberburg
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 13:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2017 at 07:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2017 at 03:27:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 13:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2017 at 08:52:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A dog and low tide
Oops. See what happens when you do this late at night? Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 13:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2017 at 06:21:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Riksdagshuset (Parliament House) in Stockholm, with the Kungliga Operan (Royal Swedish Opera) in the background.
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 13:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2017 at 13:41:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

United States President Barack Obama bends down to allow the son of a White House staff member to touch his head
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  •  Info This photo was taken in May 2009 and in all the articles written about Pete Souza's new book "Obama: An Intimate Portrait", this is an image the picture editors choose. The composition isn't perfect (the boy's dad's head is cropped), the focus isn't perfect (slightly back focused), but Souza only had time for one click and fortunately froze just the right moment. A photograph isn't just about technical attributes. The little boy asks "I want to know if my hair is just like yours". You can read the full transcript in this NY Times article, and Souza's own opinion of and story behind the photo on p38 of his book (currently being shown on his web page). Whereas most photos hung in the White House are rotated every few weeks, this one was kept up for three years. Its removal prompted protest from staff who regarded it as an important stop when taking people on a tour of the White House. So it went back up again till the end of Obama's term in office in 2017. The image shows the achievement of a black man in America and possibilities open to a black child: is he just like me; could I be just like him? It also shows the most powerful person of a most powerful nation bowing to a mere child and permitting intimacy. Souza took 1.9 million photos while following Obama's presidency, so I guess a few of them should be worth featuring! Created by Pete Souza - uploaded by O'Dea - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Colin (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I agree with you. Quite a nice illustration for "Head of State". ;) Yann (talk) 13:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose is not FP JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • JukoFF, the rules at FPC require an explanation for an oppose vote. Simply saying "is not FP" is not a reason. Please note the FPC criteria include "Symbolic meaning or relevance" and that for FP wow factor can overcome technical shortcomings. This has become a historically important photo by a notable photographer. -- Colin (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • The photo is very, very, very poor quality, very bad focusing, cropped heads, blurred faces. Do not understand the uniqueness of this photo. Or do you think that this is a random photo and it was removed from the first and not the tenth attempt? JukoFF (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Souza wrote: "It happened so fast. I clicked just one picture". The aperture of f/2.8 does not permit much focus range, and the focus is more than acceptable for many print sizes. He also writes "Later, when I saw the picture blown up, I knew it was special". I suggest you buy a book of Magnum photos, many of which are regarded similarly as classics that make other photographers envious, and you might realise that most of them are really nothing special technically, with all sorts of focus, exposure and composition shortcomings. -- Colin (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support An unusual situation worthy of a feature. Trust a kid to surprise everyone. :) I'm also intrigued by the bent paper clip on the Resolute desk. --cart-Talk 14:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Croped head of person on left is very disturbing. At least photo cut have different crop to avoid that. --Mile (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support per nom. I visited an exhibition on Martin Parr's work last week. Barely any picture of his would survive here on FPC. Which is both sad and intriguing... for us. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The president's face is out of focus, not a very good photo - I expect better from a professional.--Peulle (talk) 01:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Come on, folks! This is a historic, iconic photo, and you're complaining about trivia? So what that it has technical shortcomings? This wasn't a posed photo - either you get it or you don't. You might as well nitpick to death the photo of Neil Armstrong walking on the moon if you're just going to ignore the historical and societal importance of a photo like this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry, the composition is just bothering me too much, even if it is a nice moment. I think this one is just as humbling/cute, and much better technically, so I'm judging against that very high standard -- Thennicke (talk) 07:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thennicke (and others) you can't judge this against a posed photo, or against our other people photos taken in a studio or outdoors in bright light. This is one of those images, as Ikan puts it, of "historical and societal importance", and for that reason the technical aspects are just irrelevant. I have no doubt this photo will remain significant, as the symbolism is just too high. We are enormously lucky that Sousa's output is copyright-free, most other countries would have this image heavily licenced and making pot loads of money. Comments like "not a very good photo" or "very, very, very poor quality" are not only wrong but a sign you aren't really looking properly. When the world disagrees with you, and news photo editors all over the world love this image, it is time to re-evaluate your personal criteria for what makes a great image. The bit you all praise at FPC, sharpness, exposure, that's the bit done by Nikon and Canon and Sony, and frankly we don't deserve any praise for that. -- Colin (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps the world does disagree with me, but that doesn't make me wrong - looking at an image is a subjective thing, and I'm not feeling the "wow" - just another picture of Obama to my eyes. Perhaps I needed the backstory or something before I looked at the image, so that I came to the task with preconceptions (and that's not intended as snarky). I agree that the story behind it is nice, as is the symbolism, but I am not judging this image from the same perspective as a magazine publisher or a news outlet. Yes we are lucky to have this image freely-licensed. But I hope you can see my opposition as legitimate by the standards of this particular forum - and no, I am not a pixel peeper, as you might've noticed; I admit to often reviewing images merely from the thumbnail. Arguments from authority don't impress me; there are plenty of "famous" photographs that would be rightly criticised here. Fame is often different from wow. Although I can see why you would nominate this if it is trending at the moment, and sorry for what might seem like a harsh opposition. -- Thennicke (talk) 10:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • And can I add that there is a political dimension to this; I don't think the same image would have been nominated here if it was Donald Trump in the frame. There is also a political element to what is considered "historical" and what is considered otherwise. I think it is best to respect peoples' differing opinions on this matter in an otherwise "apolitical" space. -- Thennicke (talk) 10:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • But I didn't nominate it because it is "trending at the moment", the photo is eight years old and was viral 5 years ago. The only reason the photo is getting current coverage is because of the 1.9 million photos Sousa took, this is one of handful that picture editors (and Sousa himself on his own web page) have selected as among the best. Yes there is politics about race, which is part of what makes this photo historically important, and part of what makes this photo possible is how accessible Obama was. But there are 101 reasons why you wont ever see a similar photo of Trump, and they are nothing to do with politics and everything to do with the kind of guy Trump is. Well, if take a photo of a person, aspects of that person come out, and we're seeing that here. That's what makes a successful photo. In contrast, Trump's recent photos have all the charm of a school photo. -- Colin (talk) 12:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, sorry, trending 5 years ago - my mistake. Yes this image shows Obama's personality, but so does the other one, with much better image quality. All I'm trying to say is that we've got 2 FPs featuring Obama already, zero of Bush and zero of Trump, and that reflects not the photographic merit of the images, but whether we as a community consider them "historical" - it's a question of values, otherwise we wouldn't see them nominated in the first place. To elaborate on the point, 3/5 of the images in the 1990-now section are of 9/11 (with another in the unsorted area). Our community chose to nominate those images, and that shows what they care about. Obviously there is bias in this community; most of us are westerners and so forth. What I am saying here is that the "it's a historical image" argument bothers me when we already have such a bias. -- Thennicke (talk) 00:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Focal point is on the desk, of camerman with 1.9 million shots !? Lot of profs are using Auto mode, which can be much more clever than a man. For more see Do professionals use auto mode?. Its still too ordinary shot. If this would be JFK in Dallas in 1963, that would make much more sense. Otherwise i saw many more similar videos of Trump than Obama, and if someone made shot here we go. --Mile (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kiril, you have trimmed the full statement I made about the image (which is merely my own interpretation, one of many possible): "The image shows the achievement of a black man in America and possibilities open to a black child". That the image has a back-story "Is my hair the same as yours?", tells me this is a story-telling image, and not merely something photogenic. See this for details about a form of educational publication where image+story are absolutely intertwined. While our boring photos of landscapes and buildings stand alone, the very best educational images ever produced all have a story behind them. Unless one is so out-of-touch with current affairs over the last 10 years, I think most of our readers would recognise Barack Obama and know he is the first black president of the USA. So I think it is stretching things a bit to claim the message here is "abstract and unnoticeable". Your claim "the image has no educational value" is really quite amazing. Do you think nobody writes educational pieces on black equality in the USA, or that nobody writes educational pieces on Obama's character, which included being a very family-friendly personality? I could keep going... there are loads of educational uses for this image. I guess all the newspapers around the world, who have used this image, found nothing educational to comment on it? Is it just a funny cartoon? FP is about "finest on Commons" and that is more than pictures of landscapes and famous buildings. -- Colin (talk) 09:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Kiril, just Google "I want to know if my hair is just like yours". Dozens of newspaper articles from 2012 when the NYTimes interviewed the family, many of the articles wrote about race and Obama's presidency. Similar when The Grio re-interviewed them earlier this year. The google results also includes several books on racial issues, all citing that photo and the story behind it. We have here one of those special educational images that not only document a story/person/event in a special way, but the image itself becomes a story in itself. It is almost certainly to be included in any biography of Obama and any extensive discussion of race in the USA. I don't think any of us could say our FPs have the same unique educational value at all -- ours are all quite replaceable with numerous other similar images. -- Colin (talk) 10:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think everyone can have own interpretation of what story does this image tell. The notion of "black equalty in the USA" is something that I cannot recognise here at all because that would have properly worked had there been a "white" president in this image. I also don't think that this breaks any social equality barriers either with all people being well-dressed in a presidential room. The missing value here that could have made that interpretation easily noticeable lies in the lack of contrasting elements. I would have assigned great educational value to an image depicting the motion from the interaction between a well-dressed billionaire and very poor people in a ruined village or social shock from extremely poor people accessing tecnological gadgets for the first time. Unfortunately, this has nothing to offer of it, no matter what the general public says about it. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can't understand your argument at all. Not one bit. It's like you are trying really really hard not to get it. It isn't people in a room, this is the president of the USA, a black president, in his office, bowing to a child and letting them touch him. Which part of that is not just a wee bit unusual given the history of the US, or indeed, any first world western democracy? But importantly, we aren't really here to judge if you personally have no educational interest in the picture, but whether others might find an educational use for it. And is most certainly has, and here it is most certainly free for anyone to use. -- Colin (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The image has no educational value? I mean, if you wanted to argue that Commons should do away with educational value as a criterion, that's one thing (though not something to argue in a nomination thread), but arguing that this image has no educational value is just so absurd that it makes me wonder whether anything else is behind the statement. I have to agree with Colin's comment above. It's a pretty restrained response to the stuff you wrote above, and I'm restraining myself, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek, well you know me, "restrained" is my middle name :-) -- Colin (talk) 18:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And yes, like it or not, this image does not have any educational value for me. After all, it's just my subjective judgement that you don't need to agree with and something that you're not going to change. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Let me repeat: whether it has educational value "for you" is irrelevant. Putting one's Wikipedia hat on for a moment, it only takes to briefest research to demonstrate multiple reliable sources regard the image as having educational value. It is already being used educationally. So that's simply a fact and doesn't require subjective opinion to guess whether perhaps in future someone somewhere might have an educational use for it. It is of educational value. Fact. That is all that matters. -- Colin (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and what goes into your "subjective judgment", I probably would do best not to imagine, but I've lost a lot of respect for you, and I'll leave it at that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may post millions of sources with explanations of what this image really means and how big its "educational value" is, but it's completely irrelevant for me to make own assessment of it as a piece of art. Art is all about "subjective judgement" of its value based on how it articulates beauty and emotions, whereas the position of arguing against someone's assessment with some general opinion just kills the artistic spirit. I may be the only person in the world to assess that a book, painting, musical composition, film, photograph or any other piece of art has or hasn't any educational value against the prevalent opinion by the critics and the least that those who don't agree with me can do is to respect my opinion. Finally, art is different from science in recognising educational value. Unlike theories, which explain the nature of the things in a technical way and provide a relevant learning resource equally for everyone, pieces of art distinguish in that they invite personal thinking on whether there is potential for relevant learning or not.
I respect your intentions and encourage you to do whatever you want, but please stop wasting my volunteer time counterproductively. I'm here to contribute to the project to the best of my abilities and not to debate with users about my every single comment.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kiril nobody is forcing you to comment, so it isn't valid for you to complain about wasting your time. If you want to post comments about your opinions here, then expect them to be challenged. If you don't like them being challenged, don't post, or at least unwatch afterwards. One last time to clarify. We often have to judge if an image here has the potential for educational use, and thus be "in scope". While the image isn't actually being used, that remains a judgement call and open to subjective opinions. The moment an image gets used on Wikipedia, Commons regards it as "in scope" because the educational value of an image is no longer a judgement call but a hard fact (the image is used on two articles). And when we go outside of Wikipedia, we see the image is being used educationally widely. It's like having an argument, today, about whether Trump could be president of the USA. He is the president of the USA, so anyone offering a personal subjective opinion to the contrary, just looks really really odd. The image is being used to discuss issues of black equality in the USA and aspects of Obama's presidency, regardless of whether you think it could not do so. -- Colin (talk) 09:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 15:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 20:56:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hermitage of St Roque, Mantiel, Province of Guadalajara, Spain.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 22:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2017 at 12:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oudon menhir

Alternative

[edit]

  •  Comment Later I'll check if I can get this better but I guess I won't because I've edited the JPG file. @Selbymay: Would you like to try to get the image in B&W? Sorry for my interfering here, but when I saw the image I thought that it could work this way. --Basotxerri (talk) 07:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 22:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2017 at 20:23:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

First floor in the foyer of the Regentenbau of Bad Kissingen
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2017 at 20:37:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral-Basilica of Mary, Queen of the World, Montreal, Canada.
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:19, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 01:23:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Makhtesh Ramon viewed from the top of Mount Gvanim
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 02:30, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 05:09:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Three bells of Fira, Santorini, Greece
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 06:07:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Switzerland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2017 at 11:31:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hochschwab
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 20:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2017 at 15:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The stained glass window of the church St. Antony, Urtijëi, South Tyrol
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2017 at 03:51:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

8 varieties of produce at Cindy's Produce
  • Thanks for fixing the picture. It's "stuff we see all the time" that needs to be documented too, although such subjects are always hardest to get "wow-y" photos of. That shouldn't deter us, it's worth all the 'opposes' when you finally get one right. :) --cart-Talk 12:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 09:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2017 at 13:36:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bosnian Crisis
Sure, I can look at that later (unless somebody else wants to take care of it). If you have any suggestions for new file name, feel free to put them here.--Peulle (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it will; it's already been changed and it's still here. :D --Peulle (talk) 20:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media#Cartoon

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2017 at 13:48:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Church of the Teutonic Order in Vienna, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2017 at 22:44:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crypt in the monastery church Mariaburghausen near Hassfurth
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:38, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2017 at 16:02:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

All Saints Orthodox church in Suwałki, Poland
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2017 at 16:14:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Access to Garaio beach, Ullíbarri-Gamboa reservoir. Álava, Basque Country, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Spain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2017 at 17:38:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Macro shot of Gentiana acaulis (stemless gentian)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 09:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Gentianaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2017 at 12:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trevi Fountain in Rome, Italy
I also tried a photo in the blue hour before dawn, but then the fountain was not illuminated. Besides I think the tourists belong to this location. -- Wolf im Wald 14:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Lack of illumination is a big deal. I often find the presence of tourists just fine, but in this case, I'm feeling distracted by them. I'll live with the photo longer and see how I feel later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Crop it, I say. --Peulle (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment If you have Photoshop, it would be better to crop a bit lower and remove the heads with the Content-Aware Fill tool. That way more water can be preserved; I think that would be better than just cropping. --cart-Talk 19:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 19:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2017 at 11:18:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle of Marqueyssac, commune of Vézac, Dordogne, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:35, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 14:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 08:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 00:39:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Les remparts de Quebec vs Les Cataractes de Shawinigan on Centre Videotron
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2017 at 21:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Tree Shadow - Hitch Wood
  • Thanks. The Photographer. Wrt cropping, there isn't enough of the brown field above the tree shadow for me to crop it to be just field. The tree branches may be compositionally a little messy but they help indicate the photographer is up the tree. Of course one can find an educational use: shadows, Autumn colours, low sun, childhood fun climbing a tree-ladder, etc, etc. Perhaps not as educationally useful as a photo of Barack Obama ;-). -- Colin (talk) 18:44, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 14:26:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile White Necked Heron with spread wings on rapids on Darling River in Kinchega National Park, New South Wales, Australia
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 09:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2017 at 08:39:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside view of Baitul Mukarram National Mosque.
No, I won't edit it. As it's an awarded picture, and already a QI. --Selbymay (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok. The CA should have been noticed at QIC but like many other with that, it slipped through. If you don't want edit this version, you could fix it and upload it as a derivative of the original. Regretfully, I will  Oppose this version. Sorry. --cart-Talk 15:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Selbymay, these "Should we accept CA in FPs"-discussions flare up in nominations and on the FPC talk page from time to time, leaving none the wiser (example). Removing CA and other minor technical imperfections are not written in the image guidelines or rules of FP quality criteria but such corrections have been general practice / unwritten rule as long as I have been active here on Commons. The "no-CA-rule" was in fact the first rule I learned here. The written rules/guidelines have not been altered in a long time and does therefore not include many of the things that are quite easy to correct with programs and all these days. I guess the reasoning goes that if it's easy to fix something, why shouldn't we fix it so that FPs are as good as they can possibly get. We DO appreciate the artistic value in images and are not pained when looking at exhibitions. I have an equal difficulty in understanding why you are so opposed to make minor easy improvements in a photo to make it as good as possible, like any artist putting the finishing touches on a work of art before an exhibition. If you want to make an effort to change how photos are to be judged here you are very welcome to start a discussion about it on the FPC talk page. Who knows, maybe we will reach a conclusion this time... --cart-Talk 11:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • cart Contributing on commons for ten years (& 3 days now :) I know how this kind of debate is recurrent and how the consensus is hard to find but I think it would be sad in the present context of technical overbid to feature only the top of QI. --Selbymay (talk) 12:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Bangladesh

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2017 at 15:36:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lazaropole, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 19:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2017 at 23:40:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Villa Pauer built in 1913, Portschach am Wörther See, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2017 at 04:39:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Maria Wörth from peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2017 at 23:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mourning dove on barbed wire on Angel Island in the San Francisco Bay.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:10, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2017 at 15:26:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rhodes Colossus
I'm not sure, but perhaps we should search the Internet and upload better versions if we find them. I know there are some colour versions too, although I don't know if that was the original. Perhaps uploading this one would be better?--Peulle (talk) 11:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 08:16:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the Sella Pass on the Langkofel (left), the Puez Group, and the Sella group (right), South Tyrol
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 09:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree trunk on the beach
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2017 at 19:51:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 23:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 20:05:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rådhuset (Court House) underground metro station in Kungsholmen, Stockholm.
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 10:48, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 18:48:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Animation of Gears including epicyclic gears and a Rack and pinion.
  •  Oppose per the size requirement listed above. Please advise if there's an exception. We shouldn't be ignoring clear rules, this one is clear cut, it's not like trying to interpret "high tech quality". PumpkinSky talk 03:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Most QI and FP gifs are well below 2MP simply because they are many pictures stacked. Most normal software can't even produce complicated gifs as big as 2MP and the wiki software also distort the color in large gifs when they are shown in thumb. Please take a look at Commons:Featured pictures/Animated, one of the gif FPs there is only 280 × 233 pixels. This is actually a rather complicated gif, it is made up from 170 images whereas most normal good gifs are made up of 10-35 images. That is why it has to be made this small. When judging a gif, you need to look at both the "picture" like any normal photo but also look at how many images it is composed of and how it displays on the screen. The movement should be smooth and not jerk around too much. --cart-Talk 09:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Changed to support per my above comment. PumpkinSky talk 12:52, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 11:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animated

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 10:06:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 19:59, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 13:13:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bridge from Rose Garden to NATO Vista at Norfolk Botanical Garden
Commenting out emoticon per Jee because he says it's keeping the bot from closing this. PumpkinSky talk 03:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The facepalm was directed at myself for having such a silly thought. :) --cart-Talk 19:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @W.carter: , as far as the poles, after spending quite some time looking at this, I think it was a little of both. Using the guide lines you can turn on in Lightroom, it was off verticle a tiny bit now per the guidelines it's straight. I also think there was and is a little optical illusion going on because of the curved tree trunk that is right beside it. I've done what I can with this and uploaded a new version, but I have little practice at perspective fixing. @Johann Jaritz: , JJ, I know you helped me with perspectives once before. Can you please take a look at this? Feel free to fix yourself or advise me, whatever you prefer. PumpkinSky talk 22:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 15:44:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canal in Pisa
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 23:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 05:34:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A dike towards the sea
✓ Done @Laitche: No sooner said than done, I fixed that with photoshop. It was after the correction of the horizon, sorry I missed that !! . Thank you very much. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 10:46:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jovian Tempest
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 16:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2017 at 06:29:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 14:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Switserland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 02:21:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

From his vantage point in low Earth orbit aboard the International Space Station, NASA astronaut Randy Bresnik pointed his camera toward the rising Moon and captured this beautiful image on August 3, 2017.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2017 at 21:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palazzina di caccia di Stupinigi, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2017 at 18:42:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apple orchard Stoppen
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 23:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2017 at 15:03:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 23:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2017 at 10:36:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pond Pískovna (in Czech Sandpit), former sandpit in Nature park V pískovně near of Dolní Počernice, Prague, Czech Republic
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 11:08:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Domes of the Sts. Clement and Pantaleon Church in Ohrid, Macedonia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 15:59:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 14:07:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roman Amphitheatre in Arles, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 17:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2017 at 08:33:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fulton Center skylight in Manhattan
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 18:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 20:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 18:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Painting by Martinus Rørbye, Loggia on Procida
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 20:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2017 at 18:34:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paphiopedilum Pinocchio (yellow)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 20:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Orchidaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 07:00:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Railing in Ia, Santorini, Greece
  • @Daniel Case and PetarM: Do you know the location? A panorama was not a good decision, it's hypothetically. You'll loose the background or include disturbing elements at the left and the right. The background shouldn't be sharp. The distance is about several kilometers, the railing only a couple of meters. --XRay talk 19:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @XRay I wasnt telling it should be wider. There are two options, wide open f with focus just on fence (need better lens), might work better than this. Or 2 shots fence+mountain and stitched. I am sure would be sharper than single shot. --Mile (talk) 17:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Greece

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2017 at 05:26:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yosemite Valley, United States
  • Did you not read my comment on the newest upload? The original author deliberately added grain to the file, so I removed a significant amount of it. As you can see, it is still too noisy for reviewers, which means I should've been even more aggressive with the NR. Noise levels directly correlate with filesize, and as the author added grain to this, the filesize was enormous. In short - bigger filesizes are often not a good thing. What you're seeing here is not the result of a JPG quality slider being set to excessive compression settings. -- Thennicke (talk) 22:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I made a deliberate effort to not come across as sarcastic there. Seems I failed, sorry. That question at the start was actually meant as a genuine question, not as a snarky attack. -- Thennicke (talk) 07:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Colin: I've had a think about this and I partially disagree about your comment re. contrast. I think you're right to disagree with me increasing the blackness of the shadows, because black is the absence of photons, and on a foggy day there will be no such absence due to all the reflected light. But I also think you're wrong to disagree with me increasing the whiteness of the highlights, because AFAIK the human visual system adjusts its perception of a scene to make the brightest point fully saturated regardless of the contrast of the scene. And when all three RGB channels are fully saturated we get white. In short, the image should always have at least one pixel which is white (unless there is a colour cast, in which case that pixel should just be fully saturated with that colour). I remember we recently failed a picture of a cloud because the blacks were too deep, but I think that such an image should always have at least one pixel which is pure white; #FFFFFF (in other words R=256, G=256, B=256). What do you think of this? Also this image is absolutely huge; are you pixel peeping when you say it's too noisy? -- Thennicke (talk) 05:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's definitely an argument for "expose to the right" (while using base ISO) in order to retain as much information in the image file as possible, though this is done with the knowledge that one will pull the exposure back down again in post. If you are not using the full 0..255 range of a JPG, then whether "white" is 255 or 240 is neither here nor there on a mathematical information-retention level. Technically, the sRGB standard does specify luminance conditions for a technician in a TV/Film/Artist studio to sit there with their monitor at a certain brightness, with shades around the monitor, with ambient light at a certain level, and then to adjust the scene to look right -- that's how our TV programs aren't all mid-grey. The original image does actually use the full 0..255 but not in all three colours simultaneously. The red channel goes from 0..255, the green channel goes to 230 and blue to 225. On each colour, the bulk of the histogram only reaches 200. You can see then that since red is already utilising the full range, one can't simply raise the numbers on all three channels to reach your desired 255/255/255. Lightroom's exposure adjustment is not a simple "brightness" control, though, so it is possible to shift that histogram bulk higher up without blowing the highlights much more. Still, that sort of adjustment is an artistic choice rather than some scientific improvement. The books I have (e.g. The Digital Negative) suggest adjusting the exposure in Lightroom so your mid tones look about right to you, but that's also advice for a typical scene, and not always applicable to all kinds of image. How bright an image ultimately renders is dependent on this JPG value but also the viewer's monitor settings and the ambient brightness in the room. So I don't think I'm concerned about the RGB values so much as the over all high-key / low-key / high-contrast / low-contrast effect. If you look at the EXIF for the original, the author made some fairly big adjustments already. Vibrance +17. Several hue/saturation/luminance adjustments to various colours. Exposure +.25. Contrast +47. Highlights -8. Shadows +41. Whites +44. Blacks -35. Clarity +35. Sharpness +56 (which has added noise). So he's already boosted the contrast, globally, and with white/black adjustment and locally with clarity, all at very significant levels.
  • On your second point, yes I suppose if I downsize to 6MP then I can no longer see the added noise. And even at 13.5MP (4500x3000) the noise is not really apparent. The extreme sharpening (+56, no masking or other adjustment I can see) gives an illusion of tree leaf detail in the downsized image, but one can see in the 100% that soft foggy areas are full of "detail" that simply shouldn't be there. I don't know. If the noise was a consequence of lighting conditions requiring high iso, then I'd be more forgiving. As it is, it seems to be a bit of "fakery" to make the image sharper than it really is. I'd like to see what the original soft foggy scene looked like. So while the noise disappears on downsizing to perfectly usable levels, the fake sharpness is retained. I can't make up my mind on whether that's reasonable.
  • Wrt your adjustment. I think that is more extreme than removing a dust spot or two. Personally I'd be upset if someone did that to one of my images without creating a new alternative file and making the adjustment clear in the "Author" section of the image description. I know it is in the upload log, but that's pretty obscure. Clearly the photographer didn't just create an out-of-camera JPG, but took care to post process the image to their taste (whether we agree or not) which includes the contrast levels, the brightness and the amount of noise/sharpening they wanted for effect. What we have here isn't any longer John Towner's image. I think, for FP "finest", I'd like if we respected the creator's vision and offered our own variants with more separation than just a file version that hides the original from direct use. -- Colin (talk) 09:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Colin: Thanks for such a complete response. I didn't check the histogram of the original image, so I didn't realise that the full gamut was actually being used. I agree with your reasoning and have reverted to the original image. Also how did you get that exif info? exiftool? I didn't know you could retrieve such information; that's handy to know. -- Thennicke (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support the original version. Decided to forgive the over-sharpening grain, as it isn't really apparent even at 13.5MP downsized. I use Jeffrey Friedl's Image Metadata Viewer. You used to be able to link to the results page, but he had to change ISP and the bandwidth restrictions mean it's behind a captcha test. This depends on the user exporting from Photoshop or Lightroom and not removing the metadata from the EXIF when they do. And if an image has been through many tools, then the EXIF can become confused or incomplete. I don't think other tools export as much detail as the Adobe ones. -- Colin (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 00:50:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Freddie Mercury Decaying Photo
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 05:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A bunch of "mini" pumpkins at an open-air farmers' market.
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 01:37:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ghanaian Girls at Busua
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 16:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Antwerp, central station
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 19:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 10:58:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the granite blockfield on the summit of Kösseine into the High Fichtel mountains
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 19:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 18:53:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cardamom buns
  • No dear Mile, this is not photographed on the floor! This is photograped on the work table in my kitchen and the wooden block in the background is a cutting board that I have there. This kind of wood pattern is very common on the work tops in Swedish kitchens (Example) and also on walls (Example). I can assure you that most of us don't eat on the floor. :) --cart-Talk 09:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This must be some IKEA standard. But its still same, decorating isnt so nice (type of wood), seems like rombic Volvo car. Otherwise, eating on ground can be very good, and helpful for soul. --Mile (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • We are all from different cultures and have different views of what is beautiful and how things are done. We can't all agree on what is the best way, that would be boring. Btw, we use wood like that since we can get more material from a tree that way. It saves trees and is good for the environment. IKEA did not invent it but they are copying it. --cart-Talk 10:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks Colin. Most food photos are arranged/styled in some way to give the whole thing a pleasant look. The chopping board is actually where I keep it if I'm not using it, leaning against the wall. I use that small, old tablecloth to cover bread with as it cools after being newly-baked. So when I was done with the baking, I saw that I had all the elements needed for a nice photo. I arranged them a bit and set up the camera. It made for a better photo of the buns to have the cloth under and around them rather than over them. :) --cart-Talk 12:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 19:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 16:38:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pula Cathedral, Pula, Croatia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 19:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2017 at 10:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Japanese garden scenery at Expo'70 Commemoration Park in Osaka.
Discussion about composition
  •  Question - When's the last time you looked at a great landscape painting? How many points of interest are in this painting? How about this one? Complexity, well handled, is a great thing, not a bad thing. Moreover, what I feel you are really doing is criticizing the traditional Japanese aesthetic of what a garden should look like, the best to encourage contemplation, meditation and appreciation of nature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Template:Answer In the painting you showed there are the three canonical layers which accompany painting since its origins: foreground with people, lake, trees; middleground with a hill and a castle; background with sky. I judge the picture, not the culture thta originates the garden and i think, in my opinion, the pictire is messy.Paolobon140 (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I want to make clear that I value your ideas and participation. I think it's invigorating and helpful to this project. However, I don't think that merely because a picture has a foreground, middleground and background, that means there are only 3 points of interest in it. So our analyses differ. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am glad you value my considerations about the picture: commenting on a picture is always interesting if the picture is standing enough to share some impressions about it. About foreground, middlegorund and background: photograaphy descends from painting and took much from painting compositional rules; actually the first photographers simply tried to transport compositional rules from painting into photography; and actually photography have few basic rules, but all of them are simply imported from painting: rule of thirds and rule of fg, mg and bg in panoramas are among them. If you notice the best paintings and the best photographs alwyas follow these 2 basic rules and the result is something our human eye immediately recognizes as "pleasant". It is due to our human way of dividing what we see in thirds, its something automatic. Of course, you can also decide to break the rules, but takes some extremely powerful idea:-) My opinion of course... then we even might talk about the influence of Caravaggio's paintings in modern portrait photography, but thata is something different...Paolobon140 (talk) 08:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • My father was a painter who spent a lot of time explaining art to me. I never recall him mentioning a "rule of thirds", but he liked to talk about the linear arabesque, triangular shapes in landscapes, perspective (which I never really mastered seeing in detail), and relationships between shapes and forms, among many other things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, another thought: There are many styles of painting. Traditional Japanese styles don't have the same approach as the post-Romanesque European tradition. I think it also pays not to impose European-style aesthetics on all photographs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sense of aesthetics is a product of the culture and traditions we have been born in, its not something you can easily change when it comes to comment on a photograph which follows some japanese sense of aesthetics. Im italian and im automatically seeing things with an italian sense of aestethics. And remember i commented on your pic by saying that in my opinion its a messy composition. I think "messy" is not influenced by any kind of specific culture. Messy is more or less the same all over the world:-) I find a wonderful sense of aestethics in the Beijing opera, even if i was borm with Verdi's opera. Beautiful things are immediately recognisable everywhere.Paolobon140 (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not Japanese, either, but my father loved and collected books of classical Japanese paintings. It's not at all true that there are universal, world-wide standards of beauty or appropriate artistic form, and your nationality isn't a bar to learning something about Japanese aesthetics, if you choose to do some study. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 19:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Japan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 06:25:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Musentempel, Markkleeberg
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 19:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2017 at 12:15:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pond Pískovna (in Czech Sandpit), former sandpit in Nature park V pískovně near of Dolní Počernice, Prague, Czech Republic]]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 19:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 20:38:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of the municipality of Adobes, province of Guadalajara, Castile-La Mancha, Spain.

 Support--Peulle (talk) 20:33, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 00:00:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • It's an aerial photograph of Bishan Bus Interchange as far as I can tell. I didn't take the image, I just think it is of excellent photographic merit. Educational value is totally irrelevant at FPC, but obviously it is an excellent example of aerial imagery and useful for the article on the interchange. -- Thennicke (talk) 00:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think educational value is totally irrelevant at FPC. Why do you think so? Also, do you think it would be OK to lengthen "int" to "bus interchange" in the file description? I didn't realize what word was meant by the abbreviation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Because that's what Wikipedia's FPC is for. Besides, every shot is educational in its own way. And it's not my image; if you want to nominate it for renaming that is your choice; I don't mind if you do. -- Thennicke (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. I'd like to pursue the tangent about whether educational value is irrelevant at Commons FPC. Many people have strongly asserted that it's important, but none of them has spoken up in this thread. Perhaps we should discuss this on the talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 10:16:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Comment By the way, I like your photo, and if you fix the dust spots in it, I think it would be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Spain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 08:10:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 05:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • @Karelj: Sorry, I can't accept the reason of your vote. It is not necessary to have any benefit for Wikipedia. Here is Wikimedia Commons, a media archive for everybody. And the benefit for Wikipedia is not part of the guidelines of a FPC. --XRay talk 05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Karelj: Please have a look to Commons:Project scope: It acts as a common repository for all Wikimedia projects, but the content can be used by anyone, anywhere, for any purpose. And please have a look to Commons:Image guidelines too. Please add a reason for your oppose. It would help me and other photographers to understand why this photograph isn't FP in your opinion. Thank you. --XRay talk 06:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @XRay: Sorry for using not correct reason for oppose. But my feeling about this image is still the same - such photo is not enouht quality for FP. Technically pefrect. But I do not understand the reason for this nominatiom. I know, that you have a lot of FP on Wiki (some of them are also problematic from my point of view), but why this one...?? Three tree trunks cutted in let say 1.5 m height and nothint else? Maybe there is some small beetle, which is centre of picture and I do not see it (my weak glasses???)... I am sorry, but for sure I have no strong estetic sense, or how to call it, and only things which I feel looking on picture are: Have I enough wood for heating in my weekend house for this winter? and Is my chainsaw well adjusted for next work? So - no wow at all. --Karelj (talk) 18:03, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 11:07:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceramic sculpture in the well house in Bad Kissingen
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2017 at 06:17:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Italy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 15:38:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The western facade of Schloss Falkenlust
  • Fair enough, Laitche. What I tried to do was to get a good shot of the little palace not too long before sunset (i.e. almost during golden hour). The problem with Falkenlust is that it's a) surrounded by trees and b) slightly facing NW, giving the sun a hard time beating the trees, even in fall. ;-) So I hoped (I believe successfully) to compromise: while avoiding harsh, boring midday light that would have fully illuminated the façade, I went there significantly later but still early enough to catch enough light to avert really dark shadows. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 16:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 10:19:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake Mantovo, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2017 at 19:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2017 at 03:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common House Geckos (Hemidactylus frenatus), mating
  • No, I don't agree with this. The standards of quality for a Quality Image in practice are not the same as they are for one of the most outstanding images on the site, which is what an FP is supposed to be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The image is not sharp enough and the resolution is too low. Besides, the crop could be better. But the topic is certainly interesting.--Ermell (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info Extremely rare close-up photo of a reptile penetration, so exceptional, quite impossible to obtain in normal conditions, especially when you know how wild these animals are, so educative picture, extremely explicit, quality okay (by night, with a natural light, through a window, of course not in the hand), and then, please explain how you would find better. -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Beyond the conditions for taking this photograph, circumstantial elements and the subjectivism expressed by the author. Unsharp and heavy color noise, exif image information is not present, low quality on image retouch on the subject animal border and the background, not show clearly that the animals are in the wild. --The Photographer 15:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No exif ? Old camera. Captivity ! Seriously ? - Basile Morin (talk) 15:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Basile Morin, please assume good faith and don't take the comments personally. Remember that when you post a photo candidature here you agree to accept criticism and respond politely. --The Photographer 15:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2017 at 23:03:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Animated gif of signal at railway crossing in evening shadows
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animated
  •  Info Compaired to many other gifs here, this is a rather timid and unassuming animation. It consists of only ten frames and can therefore be a bit bigger. The selective animation also reduces distortion of colors at smaller sizes. It's a way of showing how animation doesn't have to be very complex to add a nice element to a photo. The photo with dark foreground and bright background, is also "backwards" in reagards to how light is "supposed to be". That is done deliberately since it emphasizes the light signal in the building evening. (The posts and poles are just this tilted and wonky in reality.) -- cart-Talk 23:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- cart-Talk 23:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This is 1.7 MPx. Any reason for size ? --Mile (talk) 10:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC) p.S. I would do panorama here.[reply]
Talk about GIFs
  • Mile, it is an animated gif. Please see the info and discussion about such on this page/nom. For an animated gif, you get the right size of the file by multiplying the frame pixels with the number of frames used in the gif. This has ten frames so the actual size is 10 x 1.7 = 17 MPx so it's a rather large gif. Also, I respectfully disagree about the suggested crop, I like to include the whole structure of the crossing (you get a nice diagonal line following the tops of the poles and signs) and the sky adds a bit of drama to the scene. --cart-Talk 10:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • cart I did never get Foveon size calculations (cant see EXIF, you bought Sigma ?). Crop is up to taste. But couldnt say for size. That in bottom is more "vectorized" shot of few colors, here is rasterezied shot with much more colors and isnt like schablone of cogs. I dont know if you made it out of video format, but can be shot in normal .jpeg --Mile (talk) 11:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmmm, I can't understand why the EXIF didn't show up. It was first done in Lightroom then in Photoshop from three original jpegs (didn't you read the file's description?) The entire EXIF is the same as in this file which is one of the jpegs in the gif. Not sure how to add it to this file though, help would be appreciated. The size is at the very top of what normal software can handle for a gif. I made it as large as possible without my program telling me the file was too large to be shown on browsers. Color always gets distorted when you turn a normal photo into gif since that format contains less colors, it's the price you have to pay for using that format. I hope you can see the signal blinking? That is the whole idea behind why I chose this format. --cart-Talk 11:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can put EXIF manually as i did on this .gif. What software did you use, i made this on Adobe, no problems with file size. I see blinking. With pano shot you move more to 16:9 (movie format). --Mile (talk) 13:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! I'll take care of that later when I'm home. :) Your gif can be larger because it doesn't have as much information (mostly black) as this one has. I'll see if I can play around with this a bit too. --cart-Talk 14:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Ok, manual EXIF added and a new version with better sky reworked from the raw originals. I tried to press Photoshop to make a larger gif file but due to the amount of detail in the photos, it wasn't possible. I also fixed a cropped version from Mile's suggestion, but I will not offer it as an "Alt" since I find it boring and without charm. It just exists if someone wants to use it somewhere. --cart-Talk 18:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 18:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2017 at 17:31:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Meadow near the village of Manastir, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2017 at 07:53:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Main Building of Nankai University

* Oppose are you serious? Perspective correction? more nothing of interesting... --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2017 at 08:48:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tianjin Grand Theater Concert Hall
{@Ikan Kekek: My understanding from my own pictures in the PRC is that photos of copyrighted architecture of recent vintage are OK as long as the architect is attributed. Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. It's not clear that the architect is attributed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose Per the other opposers. PumpkinSky talk 23:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 22:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#China

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2017 at 04:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Larches in Seebachern, Albeck, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 17:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2017 at 17:49:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 19:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2017 at 16:48:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan, Italy


Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: with six opposes and no new supports in five days, this nomination has a snowball's chance in hell Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 08:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Daniel Case This would have been removed anyway because of the other end of the "5th day rule":
  • "8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5) 1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have no support (apart from the nominator)."

--cart-Talk 21:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: Yes, I figured that we were getting there; just didn't know how far along (and I probably wouldn't have even noticed this if I wasn't trying frantically to catch up after Thanksgiving week. Thanks!) Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 18:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]