Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2022 at 18:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2022 at 09:25:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common crab spider (Xysticus cristatus) female with prey Carniolan honey bee (Apis melifera carnica)
  • Yes, the Canon R6 has in-camera focus-bracketing. I use it with a monopod. There is some movement but from the spider and the wind, not to mention the photographer, so lots of attempts needed. I used to use the Helicon Tube, which was more clunky. I then select a set of images to stack in Helicon Focus 8. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Thomisidae (Crab Spiders)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2022 at 19:10:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Webb's First Deep Field
Hahahahahah!! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2022 at 06:03:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Campaign "Turn waste into art". Floor artwork with ceramic pots rescued from the bulky waste by the student environmental group of the Karlsruhe University of Education on May 28, 2022 on the Karlsruhe market square, Karlsruhe
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Ceramics

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2022 at 10:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for Victor Herbert's The Fortune Teller
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2022 at 19:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cimetière de St-Jean de l’Île-d’Orléans.jpg
I can't do that because there are other trees that disturb the scene --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per others. Shadow on the tree is also very dark and distracting. I think I see what you might have been seeing, but the camera just didn't capture it this time. You might have had a better chance with a stronger sky. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have raised the shadows --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Apart from the too dominating tree, the graves as such look washed-out with many blown bright areas (petals and leaves of flowers). Light seems too harsh for this scene; contrast of dark tree vs. bright graves might be controlled better by a careful development from the raw file. As it is, I do not see what’s so outstanding about it, sorry. Might be QI but nothing to feature. --Kreuzschnabel 12:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new development, I appreciate the feedback, thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
… and again the votings here refer to several different versions. This is most confusing. When reworking a nomination, please nominate the new one as an alternative to keep votings apart. Or either, if you don’t want to give it a different file name, withdraw your first nomination and place a fresh one. --Kreuzschnabel 19:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think it is necessary to upload another file despite being only a minor change over the same picture, I added comments about the changes. IMHO If someone wants to check the corrections is more easy to check the upload history --Wilfredor (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 20:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2022 at 15:45:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The sallow
  •  Comment Mine has much bigger reso and because of this more details with pleasing evening light and compo. Everything is different here. -- Ivar (talk) 05:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I agree with Charles in so far as I was astonished about the ‘strong oppose’ to his moth photo, too. Strong opposes should be reserved for rare cases; they tend to say more about the voter than about the photo – the last user which had a preference for ‘strong oppose’ was later uncovered as a fraudulent revenant ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2022 at 15:42:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

'The squatting man', artwork by Antony Gormley. Markerstrekdam, Lelystad, Netherlands
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2022 at 19:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Pez peine (Xyrichtys novacula), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-09, DD 33.jpg
  • Dull light in my view, like washed out. Concerning the focus, the depth of field is very shallow, and because the fish is leaving, it gives the feeling to have a blurry tail in front -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 20:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2022 at 07:38:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taijiang National Park
  •  Comment Basile has given an excellent description. But doesn’t this contrast make the photo even more important? Because it shows exactly what we, the great homo sapiens sapiens species, have made this earth: it is still wonderful from a distance, but damaged, destroyed, and full of litter everywhere when one takes a closer look. This becomes most obvious in a photo like this which looks like a dream from afar, but full of waste when looking closer. --Aristeas (talk)
  •  Comment I agree, but the concept of the landscape as an idealized picture of the countryside dates back to at least ancient Roman times, when people who moved to Rome or other cities and were too far from countryside to see it anymore liked to have pictures of it in their houses. So I think this is a reasonable philosophical disagreement about what a landscape should be. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 16:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2022 at 20:33:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view from the Knopfmacherfelsen in the Upper Danube Nature Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2022 at 12:52:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Familiar bluets (Enallagma civile) mating
  • No. I would've nominated that one. :P Though it would be better without that leaf, the contrast is strong enough and subject sharp enough that I think it's still worth a star, though. YMMV. — Rhododendrites talk18:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2022 at 17:16:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Three female marbled whites (Melanargia galathea)

 I withdraw my nomination I was not going to nominate until I saw comments at QI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing ghosting. Honestly, I think this nomination could have continued until the end and had a good chance to pass, but your decision to withdraw is respected. Added to my list to give this image another chance in FPC later. -- IamMM (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2022 at 20:56:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2022 at 09:52:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ganymede photographed by Juno in 2021, Projected from the perspective of '3.
JPEG Version

Ganymede photographed by Juno in 2021, Projected from the perspective of '3.

  • In addition, PNGs can also be used for archival versions of photos (because PNG uses a looseless compression), but for displaying them in Wikis, a JPEG version works better with most photos, because the JPEG file of a photo is (normally) smaller and the MediaWiki software renders a better preview of it. --Aristeas (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:49, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Natural satellites

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2022 at 06:14:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

RhB ABe 4/16 "Capricorn" EMU between Davos Wolfgang and Davos Laret, Switzerland
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2022 at 20:00:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slow Life in a Chinese teahouse
  • ✓ Done Many thanks for your notice, Ikan. I have eliminated some halos at the xy coordinates (700,1970). In addition, I removed some remaining color fringes as best I could. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ✓ Done Thanks for your notice, Ikan. Removed halos at the xy coordinates (2430,1950). Now it was clear to me which part you meant, I misunderstood you at first. But not bad, so I was able to fix several more flaws :) Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Many thanks for your interesting personal insights as well as the detailed and precise description with which you have aptly characterized the fascination for this great capture. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Traditions

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 01:45:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fountain of Trevi
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 07:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Fountains

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2022 at 08:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes) juvenile
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2022 at 07:32:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cuon alpinus with prey and a Varanus salvator
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2022 at 05:03:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower and buds of adenium obesum

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2022 at 09:51:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Australasian shoveler
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Spatula

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2022 at 04:15:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caesium Chloride under microscope
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks and Minerals
  •  Info created and uploaded by KarlGaff - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 04:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support It's really pretty, but how does a compound with only two elements produce so many colors? I guess these colors were shined through the film. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The colours arise because of the birefringence exhibited by the crystalline film. When a sample possessing birefringence in its crystalline structure is viewed in between two crossed-polarisers, you will see beautiful colours. The colours depend on several factors including the thickness at each point and the orientation of the crystal axis with respect to the optic axis of the microscope. When a wave plate is inserted in the optical path of the microscope, it introduces a phase shift in the light beams, ultimately producing colour. Different waveplate thicknesses can give different colour palettes. Colour is not artificially applied, it's derived by the physics and chemistry of the sample and setup. KarlGaff (talk) 10:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks and Minerals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2022 at 14:51:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ukranian Nobel Prize winning zoologist Élie Metchnikoff
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 23:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Killed in committee" / J.S. Pughe
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 15:46:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosa floribunda 'Fée des Neiges' in Jardin des 5 sens in Yvoire, Haute-Savoie, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2022 at 16:14:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pond in Kadriorg Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 05:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Estonia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2022 at 07:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Theresienstadt Concentration Camp Czech Jewish Holocaust Survivor Ela Stein-Weissberger
Alternative Version

 I withdraw my nomination I withdraw my nomination. I still would like to ask users who stated this was not impressive to them, what exactly makes a portrait of a woman impressive in their eyes. I see a lot of images on that gallery page of portaits of women that show a lot less character and personality then this shot. You do not have to tell your thoughts out publicly, but please ask yourself - what makes a portrait of a woman stand out to you? --Kritzolina (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I think this is a very good portrait, and it certainly touches me, but I think that everyone who had problems with the photo as an FP except for Daniel was concerned solely with technical issues. Had the photo been much more nearly devoid of noise, I think there's a good chance that it would have passed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    To me it just didn't make me want to know more about who she was ... Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I clearly read the concerns as purely about the technical shortcomings from your comment, Ikan, but not so sure about others. If all "not impressive" votes are meant like this, then I am happy. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not just technical shortcomings for me. A portrait should do justice to the sitter. This does not. The eyes, for instance. And I can tell you that my pictures of pretty birds and butterflies do much better at FP than drab ones. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be curious to find out more about how you're reacting to this portrait. What are you noticing about the eyes, and what strikes you as drab? Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Kritzolina, I am sorry that you have withdrawn your nomination. I had abstained from voting on this photo, but just for pure technical reasons. Apart from the technical quality I think this is a good portrait photograph of a very impressive personality. Please do not stop to nominate such and other photos here – we need some change from our usual subjects, and especially we need nominators who open our (masculine?) fixation on technical perfection, “wow” photos and flawless beauty. This photo has something which is missing from many of our featured female portraits: it shows character. --Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I would like to endorse Aristeas' comments here. The portrait image of this remarkable personality has expressiveness and character. I tried to do an even better denoising, but unfortunately the technical source quality is just not good enough. For this reason, I too have abstained from reviewing it. I look forward to your future contributions, by which you make an important support to diversity. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2022 at 08:00:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eruption of the Old Faithful Geyser in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA
  • ✓ Done Thank you for your suggestion. Noise reduction was already done in the sky, but I improved the noise reduction. Additionally I reduced the sharpness in the blue parts of the sky. --XRay 💬 08:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ✓ Done The noise reduction was already on a very high level. I have now tried a completely different approach (masking of the blue sky, noise reduction, blurring) with another tool. --XRay 💬 15:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Volcanism

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2022 at 07:58:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Five Sails at Canada Place in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2022 at 08:32:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Veles by Marek Hapon
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 17:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2022 at 21:54:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moray eels (Muraena augusti), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain
  • Thank you Charlesjsharp, I looked closer into it and applied similar changes (I found the denoising a tad to much, so not going that far) specially in terms of denoising and compensating the "critical areas" with some sharpening. I like indeed the result overall and I'm therefore happy that you uploaded that version. If somebody prefers your version, I would add it as an alternative to the original nom. Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alt

[edit]
Moray eels (Muraena augusti), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2022 at 00:10:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waste block turbine and generator in Iru Thermal Power Plant
Out of focus? Are you sure? Kruusamägi (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Estonia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2022 at 17:16:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise in Carpathian National Park
  •  Comment So maybe they can also be removed in post-processing. Vian, would you like to try? (Edit: Unfortunately, they haven't been on this site since 2020. Anyone want to try their hand at this?) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Right, it's fixable by careful softening and graining processes if the area is clear. In this case it is quite complex because the fine details of the branches with the snow would suffer. In my experience, a lot of masking work would have to be invested to protect those details from processing. But maybe another user has a more creative, faster solution. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I don't see a problem with the snow or branches, so though I don't know how to fix the problem, I would suggest selecting the sky and not touching the snow or the branches in the process. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:54, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2022 at 17:13:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church tower window of St. Jacobus in Hambach, Rhineland/Palatinate, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 07:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2022 at 18:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:53, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Saturniidae_(Saturniids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2022 at 16:29:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° panorama of the Estonian Mining Museum
@SHB2000: This is 360° panorama. Look this image in here. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh didn't realise that.  Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Estonia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2022 at 13:00:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South tower, Limburg Abbey, Bad Dürkheim, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2022 at 16:54:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Musée d'Orsay and Pont Royal, Paris 13 June 2021
This is a second version of the picture, with a perspective improvment (by Paris 16). The sky is more yellow in this second version than the first. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Au contraire! To my eyes, at least, it is now more green and seems oversaturated by comparison with the original, in which the colors look more natural. I'm going to have to oppose for now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2022 at 05:53:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White teatfish (Holothuria fuscogilva), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Phylum_:_Echinodermata

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2022 at 09:57:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The USS Missouri was one of the first U.S. Navy steam ships. It travelled across the ocean to Gibraltar... at which point an engineer accidentally broke a container of turpentine, it caught alight, and, well...
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1800-1850

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2022 at 15:26:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Papaveraceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2022 at 07:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fruit Bat Falls on Eliot Creek, Jardine River National Park, Queensland
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: insufficient quality --Kreuzschnabel 10:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2022 at 10:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

installation „Tusch“ by Nevin Aladağ
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Radomianin (talk) 20:58, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2022 at 08:46:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wild teasel after flowering, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2022 at 08:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Shamsa (literally, sun) traditionally opened imperial Mughal albums.
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in color

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2022 at 16:27:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marburg Castle
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2022 at 16:51:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Town hall of Thonon-les-Bains, Haute-Savoie, France
 Question "Not suitable"? What do you mean? Sounds like "should never have been nominated" to me, and I really cannot see that. It’s a good photograph at least, we’ve got poorer candidates running without remarks like this. --Kreuzschnabel 11:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2022 at 15:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Train at Ölme, Sweden
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2022 at 12:53:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hippopotamus in Saadani National Park in Tanzania
  •  Comment There is a tiny amount of green CAs at the top border, and an even smaller amount at the left and bottom borders of the hippopotamus’ body. Should I fix them? --Aristeas (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Even when I'm looking for the CAs, they are extremely narrow and hard to see. Fix them if you like, but I could understand why you might not want to devote time to that unless anyone says they'd change their vote on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support Support In (human) portrait photography, many people hold the view that an overexposed background is OK, and per Ikan I would tolerate it in this animal portrait, too. Sharpness is good. The CAs are extremely minor, and I can fix them if anybody wants. The right crop … is a bit odd, but it contributes to concentrate the photo on the head and facial expression of the hippo. And that is the main point of this photo: maybe this is a matter of taste, but I am really impressed by it, it’s just so very hippo. ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC) — Changed to support because minor issues have been fixed. --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 17:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit Uploaded an edit by Radomianin over the original that fixes the CA and exposure. Aristeas is very right about the crop, there is a place for a full body shot but a close up like this that shows the battle scars, the hairs and the overall might of the beast is what I like about it --Muhammad (talk) 07:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 15:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2022 at 21:15:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Three-quarter view of ornate Victorian house on a day with a lightly clouded blue sky and trees in full leaf
  •  Comment I'm feeling like not, because it bugs me that the foliage impinges on the building on both sides. But I see no reason to rain on your parade by opposing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I kind of like the way it frames the building. These later Victorian styles were meant to be less at odds with a surrounding pastoral landscape; this demonstrates that. I was careful when taking it to make sure the foliage wasn't blocking the building per se. Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 07:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 08:50:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Man with camel-drawn cart on a desert road near Bikaner, India
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 19:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2022 at 11:40:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Oppose crowded composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:11, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 15:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 11:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valère Castle in front of a cloudy Haut de Cry.
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 19:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Switzerland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 15:26:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower bud of a Dipsacus (teasel)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 19:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Dipsacaceae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 06:07:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 19:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Chamidae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2022 at 14:31:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 21:55:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sea star (Narcissia canariensis), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2022 at 21:26:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SJ Norge Di 4 with day train 481 between Finneidfjord and Mo i Rana, Norway.
  •  Comment I don't deny your right to oppose, but would you automatically oppose a photo for not being tack sharp because it was shot in fog? I just think it's logical to consider that a bit of softness can be reasonable in a snowstorm. It's not like this photo is an indistinguishable blur. But sure, everyone has their limit and variety makes the world go round. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:58, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 22:02:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum skylight
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Glass ceilings and skylights

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 05:36:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eiffel Tower

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 05:08:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Norris Porcelain Basin in Norris Geyser Basin in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2022 at 10:22:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Celestine
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2022 at 22:32:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kaohsiung Music Center
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Taiwan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2022 at 18:22:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brain coral (Platygyra daedalea), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2022 at 16:49:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Les Hauts Forts (2466 m) in commune of Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2022 at 22:27:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mir mine five years after flooding
  •  Question Dear SHB2000, I would like to understand this oppose better, especially because it is a strong one. Do you mean that every photo which contains the sun does hurt your eyes? Or do you refer to the lensflares below of the sun? --Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 05:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Livraria Lello

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 16:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Town Hall

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 04:52:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dunes of Reserva Biologica de Santa Isabel
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2022 at 23:55:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Adam and Daniel, thank you very much for your responses and insights! Very interesting. Well, human beings are complex and often have contradictory ideas and attitudes (mostly without realizing that they are contradictory), and so I should not be surprised that this applies also to Kipling. --Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 14:25:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chinese bamboo partridge (Bambusicola thoracicus), photographed in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. This bird is endemic to China, and introduced to Japan.
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 15:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Desayuno en el albergue de los brazos de morpheo
✓ Done Daniel Case I rollbacked any sharpening filter, please could you take another look?. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done -donald-, I lowered the HDR to give more light to the table, please, could you take another look?. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, the table top did not change in light, the window and curtain only. -- -donald- (talk) 11:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I artificially enlarge the image with Topaz Gigapixel but this created other problems like oversharpening commented by others. --Wilfredor (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, so thank you from removing the enlargement again. --Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was an experiment that went wrong, I always try to improve the photos but sometimes one ends up spoiling it. I consider myself more of a photographer than a photoshop editor, I like using stitched photos more than using the fake topaz Gigapixel trick but I wanted to try to see your comments and finally someone commented on what I more or less feared. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your answer. IMO use of Topaz Gigapixel to enlarge images should be highly discouraged on Commons, and certainly not accepted on FP. Yann (talk) 09:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yann I think that you are right, also Topaz Denoise or any Denoise tool because it's destructive. FPC should accept the noise like we accepted the film grain. --Wilfredor (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado meu caro. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 20:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Composition of the German Bundesrat. A versatile SVG, which is structured for easy updating with ever changing voting rights as well as seventeen languages. So, among the simple a clear diagram, please consider the practical aspects of maintenance of this chart with every state election in Germany.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
  •  Info created by Aeroid - uploaded by Aeroid - nominated by Aeroid -- Aeroid (talk) 20:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Aeroid (talk) 20:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Abstain As I do not know the FP protocol for graphics. Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 22:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question looks very nice at first sight, but gets really confusing once I try to wrap my head around it. What exactly does the area size encode? Is it really the number of seats per party? That doesn't seem to add up. For instance, afaict SPD in Saxony and Linke in Bremen each cannot have more than one seat (they are the weakest of three parties in their state and the states have only 4 and 3 grey rectangles aka seats respectively). So why is the area for SPD in Saxony larger than the area of Linke in Bremen? In other places, I can't even make out which area is larger: Grüne in Bremen or Linke in Berlin? Luckily this is based on an official figure so I don't feel bad about being blunt: Regular pie charts are already bad enough in that regard, but this is almost completely obscure to me. At the very least it needs a much better description. --El Grafo (talk) 08:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC) PS @Aeroid Let me know if I'm somehow missing the point here. Also be aware that it's entirely fine to make adjustments to both the file and the description during the nomination as long as you notify people here. [reply]
    • Turns out I indeed completely missed the point. Apparently, seats from one state are not divided between the parties in a coalition after all. The area representing a party within a state's slice of pie (or donut) is not equivalent to anything. It just depends on the number of seats available (angle) and number of parties in the coalition (number of subdivisions in a slice). This is just a ridiculously convoluted and unintuitive way of transmitting the same information as in File:Bundesrat Sitzverteilung.svg. A great example of design decisions getting in the way of delivering the message. Obviously not Aeroid's fault, who afaict did a great job with the manual SVG. Sorry, but I can only  Oppose this for being unclear and potentially even misleading. --El Grafo (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      It's not a standard election diagram. It illustrates a rather custom German constitutal body with its particular details of composition and voting procedures.
      But thanks for digging into it and trying to get your head around it. I also did the other diagram you mentioned, which I abandoned due to information of the actual current division of power was encoded on the physical seats. That didn't work on thumbs.
      Just to explain a little bit this choice here: a "slice" is a state, each state has defined number of seats by constitution. The seats are the outer circle grey boxes. This defines the "width" (angle) of the slice.
      A state is ruled by single parties (Saarland) or most commonly coalitions. There are typcially majority parties "leading" teh coalition and get their candidate elected to be the state's head of legislature (Ministerpresident). This majority party is one the outermost position in the slice, taking up most of the "area". the smallest coalition member is on the innermost postion of the slice. For me this is enough info and as much as you could encode. The election results leading to this coaltion are not really relevant after the coalition takes power and divides ministers among them as they decide. The seats here and voting procedure are by law bound together and a stae has to vote as one with all their seats. So I think it well represents this kind of political body. The offical charts on the Bundesrat.de website are very similar, so didn't really invent soemthing new.
      There is a second very similar diagram style the I maintain and can update within 2 minutes which is suitable for even smaller thumbnails.
      As mentioned really not much of an "design", I re-use color choices from the election diagrams on wikide and just put quite some work on easy translation and update capabilities of this.
      But thanks for your feedback, if more people don't get the content (which is complex, can't change german law), I'm happy to consider incorporating it in a further variant. Aeroid (talk) 16:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So I actually got it right the second time - yay! After some consideration, I think my main problem with understanding the chart was that it looks very much like a stacked bar chart of one thing (probably proportions of 100%) merged with a half doughnut chart of another thing. Figuring out what the doughnut part means was relatively easy. But figuring out that the stacked bar chart is not a bar chart at all took a while. I'm not saying that bar length should encode more information, but it could, and at first sight it looks like it does. That's what I meant with misleading above. There's of course nothing wrong with doing it like this (after all, it's pretty much identical the one on the Bundesrat website), and being useful at thumb size is a valid concern (at least for Wikipedia, not so much over here). This edit already helps a lot!
Contents aside, I'd like to say that this indeed a high-quality figure with good proportions, line weights, etc. (the only thing I would personally change is the yellow, as it's visually close to white and the circle in the legend next to FDP is barely visible on my (cheap but calibrated) screen). So if you're not succeeding here, that's not because you didn't do a good job (wow, triple negative ...). It's just that FP at Commons aims for media that has at least a bit of a wow-effect, and that's really difficult to achieve with any kind of diagram. --El Grafo (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the kind words. It was a shot in the dark. If I knew that a "Visual Wow-factor" was the prime hurdle to take, I wouldn't have tried it. Would be great if this could be clarified on the entry page. While there are of course great illustrations that could qualfiy, I would question the "visual" focus. Especially as we are nowadays facing lower entry barriers for "good looking content" (which is good), but need not to forget, that pure visuals are not the sole quality-criteria (not even to start any DALL-E discussion here). But I understand that the "maintainability" is probably hard to fit into the "FP protocol". Aeroid (talk) 11:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, the "wow" does not have to be visual at all. Can be "wow, this is educational", "wow, this is a rare sight" or basically anything else. Technically speaking, it's not even a rule, more of an observation of voting behavior: candidates that have a certain something about them that is somehow outstanding/special/impressive/better that "just good" tend to be the ones that are successful. But yeah, maybe we have reached a point where it has turned into an unwritten rule, that should be written down somewhere. El Grafo (talk) 12:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Very simple image. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your feedback, I take that as a compliment. I didn't see a need for any fancyness. I hope you have also considered the SVG code for easy updating and the 17 translations. Aeroid (talk) 20:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 20:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 09:21:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Dents de Morcles during sunset.
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 10:04:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hayedo abrazo León
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 20:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 13:21:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarlet Robin
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2022 at 15:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Édifice Price at night, Quebec city, Canada
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 04:33:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

I do have some concerns: Given that it being a promotional still from King Creole was apparently not yet figured out when this was nominated, how on earth was a check for non-renewal of copyright done? Did whoever did it checkthe magazine it was published in? That might be enough, but we don't say anywhere what was done, and that's rather important info for the license. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all the research, Adam! I closely compared these two – the one from the magazine (published in June 1958) and this one. From what I can tell, although they look almost exactly the same, there are subtle differences. (for example, Elvis' mouth is slightly more open in the magazine one) They were probably taken just a second apart, but I think that they are not 100% the same image. Should we delete this one until we find a different source? Lošmi (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Without some form of documentation, it may be best. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then. Thanks. Lošmi (talk) 05:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Unfortunately, it seems that the licensing is not clear enough. Lošmi (talk) 05:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2022 at 06:43:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Roc d'Enfer from Lac de Montriond in commune of Montriond, Haute-Savoie, France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2022 at 02:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Torre abandonada por inundación
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Poor quality, posterization, poor composition (bad crop), color distortion, and watermark. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 08:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eiffel Tower
  •  Comment My understanding is that the copyright claim is over the light shows (or if you prefer, special lighting), not the regular yellow light we see here, which couldn't possibly pass any threshold of originality. I believe the light show takes place later at night, not during blue hour. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 20:18:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

F-35 Heritage Flight Team performs in Bell Fort Worth Alliance AirShow
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 08:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 14:44:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fragaria vesca
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 08:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2022 at 05:32:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sailfin snapper (Symphorichthys spilurus), Wilhelma, Stuttgart
Only Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Lutjanidae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 05:13:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bank of Mirror Lake, Yosemite National Park, California, USA
  • Yes, it is. Additional there an additional noise reduction in the sky. May be this cause the (nearly not visible) transitions. (I can't see the transitions.) --XRay 💬 15:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 14:51:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ascaris under microscope
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Other lifeforms

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 09:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac des Plagnes in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 10:51:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of St. Peter's Church in Tartu
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 08:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cover of the pulp magazine Weird Tales (August 1926, vol. 8, no. 2) featuring The Woman of the Wood by A. Merritt.
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 14:54:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Antique hay rake
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2022 at 14:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Only Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2022 at 12:54:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old World swallowtails (Papilio machaon) "duelling" in Winterthur, Switzerland.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 04:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eiffel Tower
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 10:30:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower buds of an Agapanthus
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 08:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common lionfishes (Pterois miles), Red Sea, Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2022 at 18:15:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Violet sea urchin (Sphaerechinus granularis), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Echinoidea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 21:06:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Múlafossur
 Comment While we both agree that the top crop ist not ideal, I am confused about your description of the sky as "too dull". I find the cloudscape interesting and would love to see more of it, as mentioned. What would consider "not dull sky"? --Kritzolina (talk) 09:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have taken a look at two illustrated books about the Faroer. From the photos there I get the impression that this is a very “typical” Faroer weather and therefore (at least) appropriate for a Faroer FP ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 15:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I think the cloudscape is dull not interesting. It's a matter of taste which is often the case at FP. I usually prefer some blue sky. I am surprised that people are voting support yet acknowledging the weaknesses of this image. There is no reason to present an image that is so tightly cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The image wasn't taken with that crop on purpose. I couldn't go further back there to fit in more + my wife opposed me buying a full-frame camera, so I'm stuck in APS-C crop factor hell unfortunately :-) --HylgeriaK (talk) 14:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Faroe_Islands

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2022 at 00:12:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two females panthera onca at Estação Ecológica de Taiamã
  •  Comment And nothing happens … @Queucer: We want to help you; we would be happy to feature your photo once the processing of the raw image file has been improved. I am sure several of our experienced photographers will even do it for you if you give them the raw image file (i.e. the CRW or CR2 file in the case of your camera); for example, I offer you to try it, just contact me. Or ask e.g. Poco a poco who uses a similar camera and has much experience in optimizing high-ISO shots taken with a Canon 5DS(R). All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will order Charles Topaz Denoising AI SW and can give it a try, otherwise I'll use Adobe Lr/Ph, but sure, I will try to help here Poco a poco (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    at ISO 800 I don't think Topaz will even be necessary (to get my vote anyways). A proper "mask" setting shall greatly improve the sharpening output. Maybe combine that with some slight NR too. Of course, no one will say no if you have it and can make it even better... ;) - Benh (talk) 14:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
Did you see that noise? It's way above anything we've ever promoted. People here have done better in worse situations. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
People here do not live in a third-world country, where a camera is a luxury.
And photos are not only technical quality.
"People here have done better in worse situations."
Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
I am looking at all the jaguars that we have in FP, one is steady steel, and by your criteria would never pass.
Two are in bright sunlight. Made by a gringo, not a Brazilian, or other South American.
And the rest is in a zoo.
So "People here have done better in worse situations."
Probably from a boat, after sunset, in a rainforest (that you may not know, but is hell dark), a fight scene, with a 7 years old camera that cost today 21k BRL (the same price of high-end Canon R5 in the USA) one year salary of an engineer in the country. So who did better?
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 04:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
El Grafo I was not the one that started the dramatic theatre by a lack of knowledge.-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 11:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you were. You were writing in English, using a term that is often considered derogatory in that language. Maybe you did not know about that. That's OK. I gave you a way out of there. Could have just said "whoops, sorry, I didn't know, I didn't mean it that way". Calm down, go for a walk, and come back when you're done being angry. --El Grafo (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is the point here, I am not angry.
I am not the one saying "Pathetic. Sad. Insulting" or "And you need to study your geography and your photography", or "try to do so without an insult". -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 12:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You need to understand English usage before insulting non-Brazilians. If you really did not intend gringo to be derogatory, then a simple apology would have worked. And you need to study your geography and your photography. This photo was not taken anywhere near the Amazon rainforest or indeed any rainforest. You should not mislead FP voters. It is unlikely to be a 'fight scene'. The Reserve states that the jaguars are social and play-fighting is a social activity for all big cats. The Pantanal is not 'hell dark', although my 3 FPs of Jaguars were not taken in bright sunlight. You could have worked that out by looking at the ISO I used: 800/1600/3200 and the lack of any shadows. It seems that this image was taken either with flash or a bright light - neither are recommended for mammal photography. I agree El Grafo that I did over-react, apologies to everyone else. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I need to learn English, I need to be polite to a foreigner, and you don't need even to learn any other language. You can keep insulting me, but every time that you write you reinforce my point. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 11:27, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your point actually? "This image has to be featured despite its quality drawbacks because it's from Brazil"? You can't be serious with that. --2A02:908:1980:73E0:1AD3:F1E0:EC1C:698E 11:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Log on, and read again. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 11:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did, and still what I put in quotes above is the only substantial point I can draw from your contributions in this nomination. So please correct me if I'm wrong (try to do so without an insult). --2A02:908:1980:73E0:1AD3:F1E0:EC1C:698E 12:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"try to do so without an insult" I will refuse to answer, first log on, second, change your accusatory posture. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 12:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the problem with this particular image is that it looks much noisier than on would expect from a photo taken with this particular camera under these conditions (5DS @ ISO 800). I'd be willing to bet that this is largely due to processing. It's easy to accidentally emphasize noise when you're not careful with your sharpening, and the noise in this picture looks like exactly that has happened. There are no do-overs in an action shot like this, but there are do-overs in processing. Should be easy for @Queucer to go back to Photoshop and fix the problem. I'd support in a heartbeat. El Grafo (talk) 08:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The strong grainy effect is clearly sharpened noise without any doubt, so it happened in processing and should be fixable as long as the original file has not been deleted. I'd suggest to withdraw this nomination here and have the image reworked by the author. - Generally, it's pointless to argue about votings here. In nominating an FPC, you're asking for other's opinions on this particular image, and with their votes, you're getting opinions. You don't have to "fight for your nomination" here (and won't make them change their vote by that). --2A02:908:1980:73E0:237D:BFE0:1BCA:AED3 09:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am just exposing a general problem that having happening and have a great effect in "what is good". We have tons of European and North American photos, or made but those illustrating another country. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 11:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are not wrong about this in general, there certainly is a strong geographical/cultural/... bias here. But this is really not a great example to go on a rant and make this point. The problem here clearly lies in the post processing rather than quality of the camera or the financial situation of the photographer. The 5DS may be a couple of years old, but it is still an excellent piece of equipment. El Grafo (talk) 11:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have to disagree even on that :( 1,2, Canon 5DS and 5DSR are good in a controlled environment but look how noisy the images are, the first one the background was cleaned, but the subject not, the second the is in ISO 400, and in sunlight, the background is not clear.
Yes, the photographer chooses to not diminish the sharpness of the photo, and increase the dark areas without controlling the noise, and this is not a good camera for that.
But under these circumstances, for me, still acceptable, and more usable with greater sharpness and with some noise. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 12:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons does not care about other circumstances. If it's exceptionally good, then it's promoted, if it's not, then it doesn't. Period. SHB2000 (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice elitist speech. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 10:38, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They're right nevertheless. Images are judged here by their excellence only, regardless of where they come from or what equipment has been used to produce them, so there's no discrimination. And you've been said repeatedly now that the issue here comes from processing, not from the camera, so your "can't afford a better one" lamento is pointless, as nobody ever demanded that. --2A02:908:1980:73E0:1AD3:F1E0:EC1C:698E 11:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment To be honest, I don't understand this discussion at all, the noise level is high, it could have been reduced and the image would have been FP to me. Instead arguing about gringos, pictures taken by foreigners or locals and so on. Somebody here, Rodrigo.Argenton, hasn't got the point. We are here to select the best images and, if possible, improve them together. Assuming all comments are personal attacks (or attacks to your country or people) is just wrong and will not help you here or in future noms. Poco a poco (talk) 08:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"I don't understand this discussion at all"
I noticed. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 00:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2022 at 19:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mausoleum of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2022 at 22:30:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female dancer with banknotes in hair
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 07:25:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Carex flava
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Familia_:_Cyperaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 17:11:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Echinacea purpurea L. Moench, Bravado. Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 19:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 19:09:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac de Tavaneuse in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 19:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 07:38:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Train between Søsterbekk and Norddalen, Norway
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 10:22:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view from the Jenner in the Berchtesgaden Alps
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 18:50:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Speckled Sharpshooter (Paraulacizes irrorata)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 19:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 12:53:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • I think the sharpness is good, but I agree about shutter speed and aperture. When a bird suddenly appears, you don't always have time to get everything right. Charlesjsharp (talk)

` Support The dark halos on the wing feathers in the first image deserved a little more work but otherwise very good..--Ermell (talk) 21:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support Thank you for the answer! (I did hesitate for some days to vote on this set because that “fusion” of feathers looks so artificical to me, but I believe you that it is mostly just motion blur.) --Aristeas (talk) 07:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Pelecanus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 21:46:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Explosion of the United States Steam Frigate Missouri
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1800-1850

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2022 at 05:05:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Beacon northern Geestemole, built 1912-1914, Bremerhaven, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 21:35:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nut weevil (Curculio nucum) on a hazelnut
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Curculionidae_(Snout_Beetles)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2022 at 17:49:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Head on view of Poplar lappet moth (Gastropacha populifolia)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2022 at 10:55:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda
  •  Info Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain. The common cuttlefish is one of the largest and best-known cuttlefish species. They are a migratory species that spend the summer and spring inshore for spawning and then move to depths of 100 to 200m during autumn and winter. They only have a lifespan of 1–2 years and have many predators including sharks, dolphins, seals, fish, and cephalopods which includes other cuttlefish. During the day, most cuttlefish can be found buried below the substrate and fairly inactive. At night however, they are actively searching for prey and can ambush them from under the substrate. Cuttlefish are carnivorous and eat a variety of organisms including crustaceans (crabs and shrimp), small fish, molluscs (clams and snails), and sometimes other cuttlefish. Fun fact: one of the few marina fauna that you could stroke (like I did with this one). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 10:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment one note added. -- Ivar (talk) 11:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Poco a poco: I see better WB and less spots, but the transition lines are all still there, it's visible even at thumbnail. It's look like giant brush is used to partially blurry the background. Was it really necessary? -- Ivar (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ivar: Sorry, I give up, if that isn't what you asked for, then I'm lost. What kind of fix are you otherwise asking for. Can somebody else please give feedback to that "transition area" in the first version? --Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 18:06, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2022 at 13:41:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

VR-Yhtymä Oy Sr1 3015 crosses the drawbridge north of Kuopio (Finland) with a southbound lumber train
Yes, it's quite remarkable, I'd say. Should certainly be added to Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Finland too! --El Grafo (talk) 07:39, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, IP, while your comment is of course welcome, you'll need to log in & have an account with at least 10 days and 50 edits for your vote to be counted. --El Grafo (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC) [reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2022 at 12:18:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Estonia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2022 at 16:16:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: 1. Very bad file processing. 2. Weak composition: random people in the foreground. 3. Distortion correction is required. -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2022 at 14:10:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 16:20:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination. — Yerpo Eh? 06:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2022 at 15:22:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

3 Jaguars killing a Caiman in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, northern Pantanal, Brazil
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 19:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Phare des baleines in île de Ré
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2022 at 21:47:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Striated surgeonfish (Ctenochaetus striatus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt
  • Btw, let me talk about the image and its level of detail. It's the first underwater macro (100 mm) image I nominate for FP. For fishes at some distance the detail is crazy (look at those teeth!) but working with this lens is very challenging, at least to me. I need lots of shot to get one sharp. Poco a poco (talk) 08:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nunca he fotografiado bajo el agua pero se que es algo completamente diferente que en la superficie, especialmente por todo ese plancton flotando, lo rapido que se mueve un pez, etc --Wilfredor (talk) 23:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Acanthuridae_(Surgeonfish)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2022 at 22:05:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative (JPEG format)

[edit]

Highly porous hierarchical structure of a Coscinodiscus oculus-iridis (Ehrenberg) Ehrenberg 1840 diatom shell.

Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 11:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Others

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 20:41:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Luc-sur-Mer Jetty
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2022 at 19:31:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Actress Sharon Tate from the 1967 film Valley of the Dolls
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 17:13:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Lamiaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2022 at 17:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lower Geyser Basin in the Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United_States#Wyoming

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2022 at 07:25:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rowan berries (Sorbus aucuparia)
* The black background is just the night sky -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /----A.Savin 11:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2022 at 14:45:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monte de Santa Luzia sanctuary in Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo district, Portugal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2022 at 21:06:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Philipp Waller digging at the 2022 European Championships in Basketball in Munich
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2022 at 15:50:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tania Moreno Matveeva
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Other_team_sports

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2022 at 15:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Amphipoea oculea
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2022 at 16:51:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Battle of Terheide
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1600-1700

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2022 at 22:16:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2022 at 11:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hoher Göll in the Berchtesgaden Alps, seen from the west.
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2022 at 18:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oder River, Germany-Poland border
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 17:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pavillon Jacquet in Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2022 at 01:26:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

ruby-tailed wasps
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Chrysididae_(Cuckoo_Wasps)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2022 at 10:00:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Robert Gardos

 I withdraw my nomination I could not shoot at lower than 1/1000s and the hall was quite dark, so the ISO went up to 5000 and that produces a lot more noise than taking a picture at the same ISO at longer exposure times. It's envitable. --Granada (talk) 13:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Dear Granada, IMHO you are withdrawing your nominations too soon. We all know that sports photography often requires extreme ISO speeds, and a noisy out-of-focus background is … well, just an out-of-focus background and hence unimportant; it may be either smoothed or ignored. The facial expression and gesture of the guy is really great. Therefore – with all respect – Basile’s critique seems a bit harsh to me. I see only a single really difficult point in this photo, namely the sharpness/focus; but even this may be OK, given the resolution, and it would be interesting to discuss that here. Therefore I would like to encourage you not to withdraw your nominations so quickly :–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Dear Aristeas, this was done out of experience. Usually one negative vote from one of the established commoners leads to a refusal of the FPC. --Granada (talk) 08:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I understand this very well, and I am very sorry for this. From time to time people declare the fall of the Roman Empire just because we promote (in their opinion) too many “unworthy” FPs. I am much more concerned about this problem – that people do not nominate their photos at all because they expect unfair and impolite critiques (I know of several people who think so) and that people withdraw their nominations quickly because they have the impression that a single harsh critique can destroy all chances of a photo. I do not say that this is the case (naturally there will be different views on this), but just the fact that people have the impression that our discussions are so unfair is IMHO a very bad sign and should make us all think over our style of discussion. --Aristeas (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Reopened. Let's see what happens ... btw: I've tried Topaz Denoise on this, the face is in fact sharp, it's just noisy. Should I spend money to denoise the photo? --Granada (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The other image you withdrew actually had support votes and no oppose votes. I don't like it, but I didn't oppose it. I am often accused of being impolite. It is really hard to find a nice way to reject an image that falls short of what I consider FP. I haven't voted on this image, but I dislike the facial expression and I don't think the face is sharp enough. I don't like the over-exposed table nor the busy background, which is usually a problem for sports images. I don't take this sort of photo but I do look at many in my daily newspaper, so have some sort of benchmark. It takes a long time to write all this detail down. How do I make these detailed critiques polite? On a current FPC, for imstance, I wrote the wishy-washy "The flower petals from another flower on the left are a bit distracting and the bee's head is not so sharp". Some voters start their critique "sorry" which is crazy. Except for newbies' FPCs here, I think regulars can put up with fair and direct criticism. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:50, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support Robert Gardos’ facial expression and gesture are great; they make this photo much more interesting, funny, and even educative for me than 99% of the sports photos I see in the newspapers etc. The background is OK. As said above, I see only one problem, namely the sharpness/focus – I wish the face was completely sharp; but considering the resolution and that no artificical sharpening etc. was applied, it’s still OK for me. --Aristeas (talk) 07:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Looking again at this image, there's another problem in my subjective view: the white ball merges with the white text of the t-shirt, thus it's not very distinguishable -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support per Aristeas. Most of its problems are indeed almost unavoidable for indoor sports shots, and I think they were handled exceptionally well here. The shirt interfering with the ball is a bit unfortunate, though.--El Grafo (talk) 09:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Very interesting scene and the facial expression represents the reaction times we table tennis players seem to have. Nevertheless there are a lot of flaws in the picture (as already mentioned).--Alexander-93 (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose A great expression on his face, yes, but you have to look too closely at the image than I think you should for an FP in order to understand why, that that little round white object is not something on his jersey but the ball. Props for the effort but this wasn't that shot. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Yes, it is a funny and interesting shot, but the face is way too soft for me. The whole image looks a bit overexposed – colours a bit washed-out and then saturated in processing. That might only be me. Took me some while as well to spot the ball as what it is instead of part of the jersey decoration. While this image is certainly, as I said, funny and interesting, I don’t think it’s one of our very very best ones in every respect. --Kreuzschnabel 17:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Nothing was done to the colours in post and Lightroom does not show any overexposure. --Granada (talk) 20:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Nice facial expression, but the bottom is disturbing. -- Pofka (talk) 08:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2022 at 20:10:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

De RESNOVA in Woerden
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2022 at 13:53:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 36 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2022 at 22:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto, painting by Caravaggio
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 06:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2022 at 14:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Green bee-eater (Merops orientalis ceylonicus) with bee, Bundala National Park, Sri Lanka