User talk:Spongie555

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Spongie555!

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, Royalty of Bhutan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Samurai with sword.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Samurai with sword.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good -- George Chernilevsky 10:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

English wiki

[edit]

Thank you very much, both for the nominations and for the information. Wolf (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a problem, really. I've got other pictures that might get promoted some day. Wolf (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the nomination. I'm really happy you liked this picture. Feel free to nominate more Wolf (talk) 21:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kingdavidkalakaua dust.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kingdavidkalakaua dust.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama 360 Red Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, valuable.--MrPanyGoff 19:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obama Portrait 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A very good photograph. --MichaelBueker 08:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dinkfuneral3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--Ankara 13:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henri of Luxembourg (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good; useful. --Jonathunder 04:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20070616 Chris Young visits Wrigley (4)-edit3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good, and very funny too, because useful to make a set with this one ? sorry, a little nervous breakdown...--Jebulon 23:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:The Qianlong Emperor in Ceremonial Armour on Horseback.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Qianlong Emperor in Ceremonial Armour on Horseback.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brandenburg Gate Quadriga at Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 10:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Women in tribal village, Umaria district, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Already an FP here on Commons. Yes, it can be a QI too. --Avenue 11:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Edwards Pittsburgh 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 00:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Robert Kennedy CORE rally speech2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Robert Kennedy CORE rally speech2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Laser Towards Milky Ways Centre.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laser Towards Milky Ways Centre.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mission Santa Clara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments obvious --Carschten 13:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mission Santa Clara.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mission Santa Clara.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galerie Lafayette Haussmann Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steampunk-falksen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The crop at the bottom is a bit unfortunate, but otherwise very good. --Cayambe 20:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Steampunk-falksen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steampunk-falksen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License

[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading File:Cardinal Bourne World War I troop review.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the file correctly? If you are not able to do this, the file will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the Help desk. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 03:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About the closeup of the coat on the throne of Don Rifan

[edit]

I've done a closeup of the coat on the throne of Don Rifan, taking a small part of the throne as well, you can see the picture and if I do want a closeup lowest unfortunately a resolution better than this is not possible. The image is here. Kaiser Guilherme II (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cassock request

[edit]

Sorry for the late reply, I've been quite busy with exams and looked over your comment. I assume it is a variant of File:Cassock (Anglican Bishop).svg]. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite possible too, the colours might vary a bit in the photograph. I'll see if I can find out more about it. If he's allowed to wear the cassock of a bishop, it might also be so that he was wearing a choir dress, and removed his rochet and mozetta. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, a quick Google search gave some results. While it is not sourced, a comment on this blog says: The Ordinary is entitled to wear the purple cassock on account of his juridiction. He is now entitled to wear it because of his rank, also. The Prelates of Honour may also make use of the purple cassock as choir dress alone, on certain occasions. Other comments seem to agree with this. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 09:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Requests

[edit]

Hola Spongie555

Con mucho gusto haré los escudos que usted solicita, pero necesito imágenes con mejor calidad. Varios detalles me llaman la atención en el escudo de Baraga, por ejemplo la cinta y el lema están arriba y no abajo como es lo usual, el escudo esta dividido en tres secciones todos de color verde, demás todos los elementos internos son son blancos, aunque es heráldico, se ve muy monótono que todas las divisiones sean verdes y que todos sus elementos sean blancos. (Online translation: Hello Spongie555. I will gladly make the shields that you request, but I need better quality images. Various details catch my attention on the coat of Baraga, such as ribbon and the slogan are up and not down as usual, the shield is divided into three sections all green, all internal elements are are white, although it is heraldic, looks very monotonous that all divisions are green and all its elements are white.) --SajoR (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Este es el primer escudo realizado, dígame que tal le parece, que detalles deben ser mejorados. (Online translation: This is the first made shield, tell me that it seems you, that details must be improved.)

Hola Spongie555

Tengo casi terminado el escudo de Baraga, solo falta determinar los colores. Para salir de dudas busqué nuevas imágenes del escudo y encontré estas: [1], [2], [3], [4].

Para la representación monocromática de los escudos (grabados, escultura, etcétera) los colores son representados por rayados convencionales. (For the monochromatic representation of the shields (prints, sculpture, etc.) the colors are represented by conventional scratched.)

Creo que el escudo realmente no es verde, ademas, según las nuevas imágenes, el escudo tiene una franja purpura que divide el escudo. Para salir de dudas, sugiero que por favor se comunique con la Diócesis de Marquette, y solicite una imagen a color o la descripción oficial del escudo. Encontre dos libros sobre el obispo Baraga, posiblemente digan algo sobre el escudo, pero están en esloveno [5], [6], [7]. .

(Online translation: I have almost finished the coat of Baraga, just need to determine the colors. To find out for sure looked new images of the shield and found these: [8], [9], [10], [11].

I think the shield is not really green, in addition, according to new images, the shield has a purple stripe that divides the shield. To find out for sure, I suggest that you please contact the Diocese of Marquette, and request a color image or the official description of the shield. I found two books on the Bishop Baraga, possibly say something about the shield, but are in Slovenian [12], [13], [14]. ) --SajoR (talk) 02:59, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mira, así esta quedando el escudo de Baraga [15]. Lo único seguro es que el escudo esta dividido por una franja purpura y creo que todo el escudo es blanco, Solo falta definir el color de las piezas internas, los corazones posiblemente sean rojos. La Diócesis de Marquette ha contestado?. (Online translation: Look, so this being the shield of Baraga [16]. The only thing sure is that the shield is divided by a fringe purple and I think that the coat of arms is white, just need to define the color of the internal parts, hearts are possibly red. The Diocese of Marquette answered?.) --SajoR (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Que bien que enviaron una imagen del escudo, curioso lo del galero, se que antes de 1902 la heráldica eclesiástica era un poco desordenada, fue el papa Pío X que en ese año la reguló definitivamente. Por favor sube la imagen y envíame la dirección, estaré pendiente. (Online translation: Glad you sent an image of the shield, curious what the galero, is that before 1902 the ecclesiastical heraldry was a little messy, it was Pope Pius X who in that year definitely regulated. Please upload the image and send me your address, I'll be pending.). --SajoR (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escriva relic chicago.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escriva relic chicago.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Those are recent paintings in Chicago of Josemaria Escrivá de Balaguer, who died in 1975. Too recent to be published without the painter's explicit permission. Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 12:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]