User talk:GanjuPatel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GanjuPatel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Muhammad Al-Tijani.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Muhammad Al-Tijani.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, GanjuPatel (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hi GanjuPatel, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:GanjuPatel/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 51 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 10:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]


Hi GanjuPatel, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:GanjuPatel/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 15 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 14 character 1: document.write can be a form of eval. - Evidence: document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="'
  2. ISSUE: line 31 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Out of scope}}',
  3. ISSUE: line 37 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Watermark}}',
  4. ISSUE: line 42 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{duplicate|1=%PARAMETER%}}',
  5. ISSUE: line 48 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{rename|%PARAMETER%|Current name is non-descriptive; new name will have to be relinked on projects.}}',
  6. ISSUE: line 54 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Logo}}',
  7. ISSUE: line 59 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Personality rights}}',
  8. ISSUE: line 63 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Flickrreview}}',
  9. ISSUE: line 67 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Picasareview}}',
  10. ISSUE: line 72 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Cc-by-3.0-FilmiTadka}}',
  11. ISSUE: line 77 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}}',
  12. ISSUE: line 82 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{NROER}}',
  13. ISSUE: line 87 character 58: This character may get silently deleted by one or more browsers. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Cc-zero-TamilVirtualAcademy‎}}',
  14. ISSUE: line 87 character 31: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: 'tag': '{\{Cc-zero-TamilVirtualAcademy‎}}',
  15. ISSUE: line 88 character 90: This character may get silently deleted by one or more browsers. - Evidence: 'img_summary': 'Change or add License to {{Cc-zero-TamilVirtualAcademy‎}}, needing review',

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 12:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]