Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 30 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Gf_dürerstr_5_18060.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hamburg-Groß Flottbek, residential building Dürerstraße 5 --Dirtsc 15:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Clone accident at the cars number plate.--Ermell 16:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's not an accident, it's intentionally done. I try to make all licence plates unreadable, because they are possible personal information about the owner. Greetings --Dirtsc 06:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with you in terms of the readability but the solution is not very elegant--Ermell 07:13, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Until now I only found this way to make licence plates unreadable. Maybe that changes, if I'm able to use Photoshop or something like this in the far future. --Dirtsc 06:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, like this it's ruined; we could help out, but we'd need the original version.--Peulle 08:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment No problem and the easiest way if you leave the plate as it originally is.--Ermell 09:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Ermell 22:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm sorry, but if you decline it, because I choosed a "not very elegant" way to make the licence plates unreadable, I'll have some more opinions about that. Greetings --Dirtsc 06:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Sorry, but I agree with the objections. There has to be a better way to get rid of the letters and numbers on the license plate than by making the car look damaged. Why don't you just keep the basic color and shape of the license plate and clone out the letters and numbers? -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment The recommended way, according to previous discussions, is to keep the color and font of the licence plate but provide it with a new fake number like "ABCDEF", "1234567" or "QWERTY". One user used a version of his user name but that met with some opposition. cart-Talk 09:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I personally don't care if you clone out the number plate or not, but if you do, a better job than this is needed. That car's rear looks completely mangled.--Peulle 12:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As for Peulle. Faking letters and numbers is much work, simple blurring or posterizing should do. --Smial 13:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
    • @Smial and Peulle: I tried a more "defensive" way of changing the license plate. Could that be OK? Greetings --Dirtsc 16:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Well it's certainly better; what do we think, guys? In case you're wondering what they mean by making the plate unreadable, have a look at this image.--Peulle 19:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
  • I think the technique used at the link is better than the new version of this picture, which now looks like the license plate was damaged, but I am willing to accept this technique as adequate.  Support now. Ikan Kekek 06:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Yeah, I'll go along with that too. Hopefully, Dirtsc can fix these things even better in the future. :)--Peulle 10:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'll try to improve that in future images. Thanks for review to everyone! --Dirtsc 13:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Spider 9216.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cheiracanthium, Eutichuridae --Vengolis 01:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Too glary. -- Ikan Kekek 09:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Vengolis, I'm looking at this photo again. It's pretty good. If you could tone down the glare a little without damaging the resolution of the spider, I'd be happy to support. --

Ikan Kekek 13:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Flash did it. --PetarM 08:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 09:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)