Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 29 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:View_of_Girona_(1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View of Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Technically, I have nothing to complain about in this image, but in the composition with the large crane in the middle. This is not the responsibility of the photographer. But it also doesn't really belong to the cityscape and is disturbing in this dominance. Please discuss. --Milseburg 09:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I have no problem with the crane's inclusion. Not only was it there, but I think it works as part of the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The crane is disturbing to some extent, but in all other aspects the image is very good. --LexKurochkin 09:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan --Sandro Halank 15:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Sieben_prismatische_Farben_002_2021_02_27.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Distribution box with empty conduits in rainbow colours for fibre optic cables
    --F. Riedelio 07:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. -- 02:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Bad crop. The point of view doesn't work for me. --Sebring12Hrs 06:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I find the crop acceptable. -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support crop is ok --Sandro Halank 15:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

File:2023-06-07_Event,_Konferenz,_re-publica_1DX_5913_by_Stepro.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination re:publica: Esther Sedlaczek, Sportschau presenter. By --Stepro 19:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp --Uoaei1 04:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Uoaei1. -- Ikan Kekek 17:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 11:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough sharpness --Tagooty 01:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Uoaei1 --Jakubhal 07:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Uoaei1 --MB-one 10:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Uoaei1 --LexKurochkin 16:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good portrait in a live situation and by far sharp enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 11:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Mike Peel 22:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)