Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2012/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
   
File:Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 02.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Boseritwik (talk) on 2012-06-18 09:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Aishwarya Rai

Scores:

1. Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 03.jpg: +0
2. Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 02.jpg: +0 
3. AishwaryaRai.jpg: +0 
4. Aishwarya rai Milan .jpg: +0 
5. Aishwarya rai 1(cropped).jpg: +1
=>
File:Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 03.jpg: Declined.
File:Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 02.jpg: Declined.
File:AishwaryaRai.jpg: Declined.
File:Aishwarya rai Milan .jpg: Declined.
File:Aishwarya rai 1(cropped).jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 06:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2012-06-18 17:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Aishwarya Rai
Scores: 
1. Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 03.jpg: +0
2. Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 02.jpg: +0 
3. AishwaryaRai.jpg: +0 
4. Aishwarya rai Milan .jpg: +0 
5. Aishwarya rai 1(cropped).jpg: +1
=>
File:Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 03.jpg: Declined.
File:Aishwarya invited at the opening of Bvlgari Hotel in London 02.jpg: Declined.
File:AishwaryaRai.jpg: Declined.
File:Aishwarya rai Milan .jpg: Declined.
File:Aishwarya rai 1(cropped).jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 06:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   
[[File:|160px]]
View
Nominated by:
Yjenith (talk) on 2012-03-11 23:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Amy Jackson
  • She is essentially a beauty pageant titleholder and not an actress at all. Since 2010 she just has tried to launch an actress career. There are thousands of girls like her. It seems that we have to place all of them in one group together with Sophia Loren, Gérard Philipe, Michel Piccoli, Jeremy Irons, Robert De Niro, Charles Chaplin, Claude Monet... Shame on all of us... We do nothing here. Alas, we have no choice since we work under the dictate of the crowd. Unfortunately, from a long time many articles in wikipedia cannot be used for reference at all. These articles can be marked for deletion.--MrPanyGoff 09:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

 Comment Because of the two VI in this scope I open this MVR. This photo here is the initial VI.--MrPanyGoff 08:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support OK, this one is better. Yann (talk) 09:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment but you can't even see her face properly cause she is not looking at the camera, the crop is unfortunate cause the top of her head is missing,the blur is excessive with parts of her hair and right shoulder being blured. Just wanna know why you think this is better so atleast I can be clear about the criteria for a picture being VI.Boseritwik (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I still support this one as best in scope and meeting all criteria. Certainly the edges of her hair and right shoulder are blurred, but her face is in focus at a high resolution. Also important to the present comparison, in the other image her forehead, chin, and cheeks are washed out by the flash/glare. cmadler (talk) 13:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Amy jackson.jpg: +2 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 04.jpg: +0 (second VI within same scope) <--
=>
: Promoted.
File:Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 04.jpg: Declined.
--MrPanyGoff 05:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Amy Jackson headshot.jpg: +1
2. Amy jackson.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Amy Jackson headshot.jpg: Undecided.
: Undecided so remains current VI within same scope. <--
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
File:Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 04.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Boseritwik (talk) on 2012-06-18 09:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Amy Jackson
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

 Comment Because of the two VI in this scope I open this MVR. This photo here has just been promoted VI.--MrPanyGoff 08:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Amy jackson.jpg: +2 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 04.jpg: +0 (second VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Amy jackson.jpg: Promoted.
[[:]]: Declined.
--MrPanyGoff 05:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2012-06-29 20:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Tim Daly

Scores:

1. Tim Daly Shankbone 2009 Tribeca.jpg: +0
2. Tim Daly at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Tim Daly Shankbone 2009 Tribeca.jpg: Undecided.
File:Tim Daly at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg: Undecided.
--MrPanyGoff 21:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2012-06-29 20:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Tim Daly

Scores:

1. Tim Daly Shankbone 2009 Tribeca.jpg: +0
2. Tim Daly at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Tim Daly Shankbone 2009 Tribeca.jpg: Undecided.
File:Tim Daly at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg: Undecided.
--MrPanyGoff 21:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2012-06-30 18:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Rupert Murdoch

Scores:

1. Rupert Murdoch - WEF Davos 2007.jpg: +0
2. Murdoch at World Economic Forum 2009.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Rupert Murdoch - WEF Davos 2007.jpg: Declined.
File:Murdoch at World Economic Forum 2009.jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 09:20, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2017-02-17 19:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Rupert Murdoch

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Rupert Murdoch - WEF Davos 2007.jpg: +0
2. Murdoch at World Economic Forum 2009.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Rupert Murdoch - WEF Davos 2007.jpg: Declined.
File:Murdoch at World Economic Forum 2009.jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 09:20, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Murdoch at World Economic Forum 2009.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Rupert Murdoch - Flickr - Eva Rinaldi Celebrity and Live Music Photographer.jpg: -1 
=>
File:Murdoch at World Economic Forum 2009.jpg: Promoted and so continues as current VI. <--
File:Rupert Murdoch - Flickr - Eva Rinaldi Celebrity and Live Music Photographer.jpg: Declined.
--DeFacto (talk). 18:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View
Nominated by:
Paris 16 (talk) on 2012-07-04 04:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Bedroom in Arles by van Gogh (Musée d'Orsay)
Reason:
Without frame -- Paris 16 (talk)

 Comment I suggest a scope: Bedroom in Arles by van Gogh (Musée d'Orsay) --MrPanyGoff 06:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF frame cropped.jpg: +0
2. La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF.jpg: +0 
=>
File:La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF frame cropped.jpg: Undecided.
File:La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF.jpg: Undecided.
--MrPanyGoff 21:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Paris 16 (talk) on 2012-07-04 03:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Bedroom in Arles by van Gogh (Musée d'Orsay)
Reason:
Featured picture -- Paris 16 (talk)

Scores:

1. La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF frame cropped.jpg: +0
2. La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF.jpg: +0 
=>
File:La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF frame cropped.jpg: Undecided.
File:La Chambre à Arles, by Vincent van Gogh, from C2RMF.jpg: Undecided.
--MrPanyGoff 21:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Bat's Head, Dorset

[edit]
   

View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff on 2012-07-06 07:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Bat's Head, Dorset
Can be closed as declined

View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff on 2012-07-06 07:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Bat's Head, Dorset
Can be closed as declined

View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff on 2012-07-06 07:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Bat's Head, Dorset
Can be closed as declined

View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff on 2012-07-06 07:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Bat's Head, Dorset
Can be closed as declined
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Wolf im Wald on 2012-07-11 18:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Brandenburg Gate at night
Used in:
de:Brandenburger Tor
Reason:
best quality in scope. -- Wolf im Wald

Previous reviews

Scores: 
1. Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 20:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Wolf im Wald (de) on 2012-07-11 18:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Brandenburg Gate at night
  •  Support For me, the bright streetlights on either side detract somewhat from this view of the gate, and while the lights at the right could be easily cropped, removing the lights at left would necessitate also cropping part of the guardhouse. Despite this shortcoming, however, I think this image is best because the lighting on the gate (and especially on the quadriga) is more muted, resulting in less of a washed-out look. cmadler (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Paris 16 (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Times are changing... See that 2009 discussion where a nominated image for the scope "Brandenburg Gate at night" had been declined because of the scope, deemed too narrow at that time: Commons:Valued image candidates/Brandenburger Tor abends.jpg. --Myrabella (talk) 08:21, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Better exposure control than in the alternative. Marginal value difference. Concerning the scope I am OK with the night scope as the Brandenburger Tor is very notable and has a special night appearance. That would probably also have been my opinion in 2009, if I had voted. But nevertheless interesting observation by Myrabella. --Slaunger (talk) 06:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 20:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Théâtre Graslin, Nantes (exterior)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff (talk) on 2012-07-10 06:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Théâtre Graslin, Nantes (exterior)

Previous reviews

Scores: 
1. Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 16:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff on 2012-07-10 06:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Théâtre Graslin, Nantes (exterior)

Previous reviews

I think that the nominator should not vote for his nomination.--MrPanyGoff 20:26, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am only former nominator.--Paris 16 (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't decide which one is better. Finally, I suppose we should demote the new candidate as not being nominated in accordance with the rules, meaning via MVR.--MrPanyGoff 20:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 16:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)