Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Mostar Old Town Panorama 2007.jpg

File:Mostar Old Town Panorama 2007.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2010 at 08:03:37

•  Info The image has a fake sky, see File:Mostar Old Town Panorama.jpg. (Original nomination)
•  Delist Cordless Larry (talk) 08:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Question I don't understand: Isn't it allowed for FPs to have fake skies?? Else I think it's not a bad picture and would be careful with delisting it.--McIntosh Natura (talk) 00:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
  • The guidelines state:
    • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable provide it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
      • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and colour/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable.

Cordless Larry (talk) 22:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Keep nice and interesting picture Cathy Richards (talk) 13:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
• {{Delist}} Us Cordless Larry--Miguel Bugallo 20:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep I find it silly to delist a picture because of a fake sky. As Cordless Larry said, "Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable provide it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive." This is not meant to deceive. It is meant to fix a blown-out sky. Maybe this should be written in the description, but I don't see how either the educational or photographic value is destroyed by a fake sky. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep Useful image. Technically well done. The sky is not the subject. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep Nice image, no reason for delisting. --Karelj (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep how does this deceive me? Don't they have skies above Mostar? Multichill (talk) 13:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I just have to say, I love multichill's comment :) Thomas888b (talk) 18:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep I didn't notice the sky was a fake one...--Jebulon (talk) 23:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep So what if the sky is fake? the majority agree that it doen't matter, and has ony been done to correct a flaw.Thomas888b (talk) 18:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Fake sky, ok, but it was only revealed last week ([1]) and the reflections in the water don't match the sky. Lycaon (talk) 19:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment It is necessary to know certainly that the sky is incorrect?--Miguel Bugallo 02:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

By your words (especialy Licaon), I think that it's necessary, and I don't vote--Miguel Bugallo 02:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

I was sure that the sky was falsified--Miguel Bugallo 02:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 delist, 7 keep, 1 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)