Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg

File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2013 at 01:02:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg

•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support great! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 02:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Again it's obvious from the colors that it's one of Frank's works. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support !!! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support one of the best I've seen in the last time. Tomer T (talk) 04:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful setting and colors. But the presence of the big rock in the foreground mars the composition, IMHO. If bridge is the main subject, more importance should have been given to it. Right now the foreground rock/hill occupies a significant portion of the frame and is kind of distracting to me when I try to look whats happening behind it -- Dey.sandip (talk) 05:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment imo the hill is necessary to provide depth and proportion to the motif. Luckily there's also a guy standing on the top of the hill, serving as scale and thus hinting at the sheer monumentality of the scene. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Fbnpch (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose: beautiful scenery, but I totally agree with Dey.sandip. — TintoMeches, 07:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment For me it's inverse, the idea and the composition are very good, but with this centring I want to see more of the hills and also more at right, this is why I don't support but anyway a good shot! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Dey.sandip. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support per Tomer T. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Like you said about my picture of "the Grand Prismatic Spring", I have seen a lot of pictures of the Golden Gate bridge better than this one and I consider that this is not a criterion.. but anyway I like the composition . --Clément Bardot (talk) 20:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I agree about the rock, but nonetheless it's a magical scenery for me, clearly enough for FP --A.Savin 21:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support This is such a lovely shot, Frank. I've tried to get similar shots from nearby, but nothing this spectacular. As for the hill in the foreground, this is the only option from this vantage point, outside of a big earthquake dramatically changing the landscape ;) Almonroth (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- composition and lighting are fantastic Ian Furst (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 12:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena