Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Cemetery Douaumont.jpg

File:National Cemetery Douaumont.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2019 at 21:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:National Cemetery Douaumont.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Cemetery Douaumont.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#France
•  Info Uploaded by B2Belgium - the rest by me -- Benh (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Another oldie. Will get back at recent stuffs later (if still here by then!). I don't think we have that many pictures of this kind, do we? -- Benh (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

• There's this and this. --Cart (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

• More close to the first. The crosses are only incidental on the second. And I didn't say we don't have any ;) (please don't dig to get the pics to prove me wrong!) - Benh (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

• Don't take it the wrong way, You did ask. ;) People like to be able to compare with existing FPs, and in this case it actually shows the uniqueness of your nom. --Cart (talk) 22:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

• usually one asks this kind of question in the hope none actually takes the time to check ;) - Benh (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Weak support A tad low on sharpness but the pattern is really striking. --Cart (talk) 22:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

• Yup :( so so lens (10-22 on my 7D) - Benh (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support I wish it was sharper but the compo is quite striking. Nice light too. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I love the composition, but I'm not at all sure the sharpness is sufficient for an FP in 2019. So I'm not sure I'll vote, but if I do, it might be to oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support In spite of sharpness and the tight top crop Poco² 08:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support Strong wow factor, but, per above, not great sharpness considering the relatively low resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per Poco --Llez (talk) 14:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
• I'll try to tweak the sharpening this week-end. Thanks for the inputs. - Benh (talk) 16:58, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 05:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Is the WB a bit yellowish? --Basotxerri (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
• Fixed I tweaked the WB, and I tried changing the sharpening. I don't think the sharpness was improved. - Benh (talk) 10:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

• Yeah, like you said, still not really sharp. The composition is probably among the best on Commons, but the sharpness isn't. The result is a lack of support from me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral Too tight crop at the top in my view. It looks shrunk. I wonder what is this thin line, darker at the end, and aesthetically would like to see more of this background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support I prefer not so tight crop from above. --Moahim (talk) 07:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart. --Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#France