Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 1.jpg

File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2014 at 22:25:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 1.jpg

•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality and nice view --The Photographer (talk) 23:16, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
• Strong  Support Really good i don't like normally the pictures of skyscraper but this is relly spectacular --LivioAndronico talk 10:17, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment good and nice however problems in the sky (see notes) -- ChristianFerrer 12:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

  Christian Ferrer, PetarM: Fixed. You gotta love sensor auto-cleaning; as soon I turned my camera off and back on after taking these four shots the dust was gone. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

   Support -- ChristianFerrer 18:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:08, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per User:Christian Ferrer, there are 2 pretty big smudge tracks. Better now. --Mile (talk) 16:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not wow for me, classical photo -- Jiel (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

  That's what I thought at first, that this skyline would have lots of photos available on Commons, but I was surprised to find that there really aren't that many decent pics of this particular view. Also, the WTC has only been completed recently. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 06:30, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Because I will support a set.--Claus (talk) 13:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

  I was under the impression that set nominations were still banned? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

  @King of Hearts: I prefer a set like this. ArionEstar (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

  Claus: I have nominated a set below. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support but I prefer the blue hour one. --Kadellar (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

  Kadellar: I was planning on nominating it later. But that might not be necessary; see below. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Nice picture capturing what the Lower Manhattan skyline is now (This was purely accidental, I'm sure, but I like that little plane in the far background at right ... a subtle acknowledgement of how it got that way. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 20:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

  Halavar: Since you added your vote under the three images but before I made it officially a set, could you please clarify your intentions? Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done I would like to vote here, for a single image. --Halavar (talk) 09:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support--Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 11:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Paris 16 (talk) 15:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Set

• 
• 
• 

•  Info OK, so it looks as if the ban on sets has been de facto lifted per the recent FPC mentioned by ArionEstar. And I feel like three photos taken from the same angle on the same day at different hours ought to qualify under any sensible definition of "set." So I'm officially adding a set nomination here as an "alt." (Though it's not really an alt; if both happen to pass, then it would make sense to promote the set rather than the single image regardless of the relative levels of support, no?) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support for all the three "single" photos, but I'm missing a night shoot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Claus (talk) 06:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Each of these is just nice, but as a set, they show something more. Yann (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 13:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 19:23, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per King --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support and 8... ArionEstar (talk) 16:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support great works--ArildV (talk) 22:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Paris 16 (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agree with Yann's assessment. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 15:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:29, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 22:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas