Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Great Sphinx of Tanis, Paris.jpg

File:Great Sphinx of Tanis, Paris.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2024 at 23:39:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Great Sphinx of Tanis, Paris.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Great Sphinx of Tanis, Paris.jpg

2047

34

4627

4524

8256

5504

possible crop?

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors
•  Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Appropriately monumental style of photography, and it's probably smart to limit the depth of field so that the copyrighted information plate is sufficiently blurred. My only question is whether there is purple and green CA in many places including the near left corner or whether those discolorations were really there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

  I cant see it, please, could you add notes?. I have corrected it by developing the photo again, I couldn't reproduce the error but I suspect that it was due to Photoshop's automatic white balance correction, contrast or some problem with the RGB profile that I had that I changed it to sRGB. Wilfredor (talk) 11:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Question Had you considered a much tighter crop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

  Yes, but I dont know where cut, you could add a note to see the possible cut? Wilfredor (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

  Done... Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support This looks better to me. As I said before, I like a monumental treatment of this statue, and it's this version that suggests a cavernous space, not the close crop, so this is the version I support, though the other one is also of FP quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

  I'm a little undecided now, I think this really shows the cave, I'll let you decide. Wilfredor (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Wow. Honestly I prefer the original version. --Aristeas (talk) 10:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support either Cmao20 (talk) 11:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support prefer this version. BigDom (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Alternative version proposed by Charles

•  Info Thanks Charles for your proposition cut, I think I prefer this to avoid the prominent block of marble under the structure that takes away from the main subject's weight. Wilfredor (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive statue, well photographed; the cropping is a benefit for the composition. I took the liberty of formatting Alternative Version as a subheading, for better section editing.-- Radomianin (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks for format it Wilfredor (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 22:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support either Cmao20 (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Thi (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC))

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors

The chosen alternative is: File:Great Sphinx of Tanis, Paris alt.jpg