Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flèche en feu - Spire on Fire.jpeg

File:Flèche en feu - Spire on Fire.jpeg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2019 at 12:32:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Flèche en feu - Spire on Fire.jpeg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flèche en feu - Spire on Fire.jpeg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
•  Info created by LEVRIER Guillaume - uploaded by LEVRIER Guillaume - nominated by Habitator terrae -- Habitator terrae 🌍 12:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support A perspective correction could be wrong here... Habitator terrae 🌍 12:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Info See also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flèche en feu - Spire on Fire.png, problems solved. Habitator terrae 🌍 12:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Strong support Wow! A well-detailed image of a tragic fire. Basically this one would have my vote as Picture of the Year (Obs.: category changed to Historical, seems to be more coherent). 😄 ArionEstar 😜 12:45, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great shot from great distance. The subject matter is very much of the moment, unlike more general shots of the cathedral.--Peulle (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:30, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Not exactly perfect technical quality, but still an outstanding shot. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 14:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support What it lacks in technical quality, it makes up for in drama and historic significance. --Cart (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing view, very striking. A bit of noise but high resolution and quite sharp considering the distance. The arrow could be more vertical (and maybe the tilt corrected), but this is less architecture than reporter photography, and we know that this arrow was leaning at this stage to collapse soon. I think this work is almost professional level (see at 6 Mpx), since it's rare to be so close of such a big fire (and as the author says on twitter a few minutes later the police asked the people to keep outside the security perimeter). Shot at the right time, when the flames are huge and the smoke intense. Great archive -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Unique I assume. Charles (talk) 16:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 16:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support We are fortunate to get this quality of free photo of such an event. -- Colin (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support An horrific sight. I thought we might see this one again once authorship concerns were resolved. Cmao20 (talk) 19:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support —Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --BoothSift 21:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 04:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support the history speaks for itself, amazing capture --E.3 (Talk). 07:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 11:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical