Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potter working, Bangalore India.jpg

File:Potter working, Bangalore India.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 01:46:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Potter working, Bangalore India.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potter working, Bangalore India.jpg

•  Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Muhammad (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Strong Support This is very good. -- Ram-Man 04:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
• still  Neutral Excellent shot and composition, I just dislike the harsh lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 05:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 08:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Smial (talk) 11:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support very nice! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --· Favalli ⟡ 01:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support (Day and month missing at the description) --XRay ^talk 06:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry to spoil the party but I really think the harsh flashlight and the cast shadows caused by it don’t do a favour to the subject. It’s certainly an illustrative and good shot but not outstanding IMHO due to lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 11:21, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • No flash used --Muhammad (talk) 12:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry for suggesting then :-) still the lighting is not really nice, looking like flashlight. --Kreuzschnabel 13:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • To make it clear what I mean, please have a look at File:GR-naxos-damalas-toepfer-2.jpg – not featurable of course, but though flashlight has been used there obviously, it still shows a better light balance IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 16:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is good practice to ask instead of criticizing directly, it is best to assume expertise, hoping to demonstrate the contrary. It is the spirit of good faith and assertiveness. This comment is not for you, it's for everyone including me. --The Photographer (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment As for me, I should be very happy without reading, after some support votes, the first opposer beginning his explanation with :"Sorry to spoil the party"...as a mantra. Thank you !--Jebulon (talk) 21:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Done. I just feel some urge to apologize, being the only one to have a different opinion of an obviously otherwise highly appreciated nomination. --Kreuzschnabel 05:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel, too much contrast. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 16:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 18:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People