Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metropolitan opera 1937.jpg

File:Metropolitan opera 1937.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2012 at 10:32:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Metropolitan opera 1937.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metropolitan opera 1937.jpg

2558

6

315

426

2879

1750

Scratch (?)

41

123

280

385

2879

1750

Some spots here

1067

187

181

117

2879

1750

Scratch

938

257

186

111

2879

1750

Scratch

•  Info created by U.S. Information Agency - uploaded by Darwinek and AndreasPraefcke - nominated by Fanoftheworld -- Fanoftheworld (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Fanoftheworld (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- I like it, brilliant composition, good quality for a B/W image. TrebleSeven (talk) 10:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Needs more/better restoration, see image notes, just marked some of them. also image has artifacts, unlike the original TIFF, it is grainy,.  ■ MMXX  ^talk 01:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Katarighe (Talk) 20:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per MMXX --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per MMXX. But will be happy to change my vote to support if corrections are made, this is a beautiful, impressive and valuable image. It just needs a little boost to be a FP. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Metropolitan Opera House, a concert by pianist Josef Hofmann - NARA 541890 - Edit.jpg, Alt version

•  Neutral Here is a new version, adjusted the brightness/contrast locally and globally, also removed most of the spots and scratches.  ■ MMXX  ^talk 00:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's much better. Tomer T (talk) 10:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps renominating it would be better, so that it gets a chance. This one's voting period is reduced at this point. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --PierreSelim (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)