Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Looking east from Mt Jerusalem - Walls of Jerusalem.jpg

File:Looking east from Mt Jerusalem - Walls of Jerusalem.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2023 at 10:35:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Looking east from Mt Jerusalem - Walls of Jerusalem.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Looking east from Mt Jerusalem - Walls of Jerusalem.jpg

7682

458

505

755

11466

2196

Just for the record: A little bit blurred

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
•  Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support. One of the reasons for this nomination is because of its immaculate educational detail. It's also in a location that is fairly difficult to access (part of a 43-kilometre (27 mi) walk), and I'm surprised at the level of effort that JJ Harrison has put in to take this shot. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Five stars! --Terragio67 (talk) 09:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support An impressive landscape. Technically not perfect — the light is quite harsh and therefore the colours look somewhat faded at the left, at least one area is blurred/out of focus (see image note), bright areas like the rocks at bottom left are a little bit overexposed –, but still decent. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment At first glance I was captivated by the softness of the image, especially in the background. Reading Aristeas' comment I have to admit that the lower left part, seen closely, could conflict with the above, or even disturb. I don't change my opinion, the photo was successful anyway, perhaps the author could find a way to mitigate this drawback... --Terragio67 (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Maybe JJ Harrison may want to comment? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Rosalina 🍵 472338 14:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is a stitching issue as per annotation, and the landscape is not that wow to compensate this. --A.Savin 14:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment It's an interesting landscape, but this issue should probably be fixed for FP. This seems like a worthy VI, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Weak support per Aristeas. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Pleasantly instructive. That's an outstanding point here. --Milseburg (talk) 07:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania