Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg

File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2010 at 17:43:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg

855

792

888

1410

4678

3253

Cologne cathedral

32

1757

769

564

4678

3253

Museum Ludwig

1527

11

3140

2819

4678

3253

Hohenzollernbrücke

11

2461

4656

781

4678

3253

Rhine

•  Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Der Wolf (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Hohenzollernbrücke in Cologne, Germany
•  Support -- Der Wolf (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --High Contrast (talk) 20:06, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Is this a stitched image? camera exif is missing.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  22:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it's a stitching. -- Der Wolf (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Nice colours and composition --Korall (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support -- Thanks. But there is an existing featured picture... Takabeg (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, of course --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 11:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Sharpness and contrast are astonishing, composition is also working. On the other hand the highlights are plain yellow, which is very salient given their size. Nikopol (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX  ^talk  23:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Patriot8790 (talk) 19:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very good sharpness/DOF/light/colors. There are a few minor blown areas, but I can accept that. It is a pity that there is no EXIF information regarding camera settings. I was curious to see which settings were used to capture this one. --Slaunger (talk) 19:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I added the EXIF information manually in the description;) -- Der Wolf (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /99of9 (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places